Hyperparameter (machine learning)

Summary

In machine learning, a hyperparameter is a parameter whose value is used to control the learning process. By contrast, the values of other parameters (typically node weights) are derived via training. Hyperparameters can be classified as model hyperparameters, that cannot be inferred while fitting the machine to the training set because they refer to the model selection task, or algorithm hyperparameters, that in principle have no influence on the performance of the model but affect the speed and quality of the learning process. An example of a model hyperparameter is the topology and size of a neural network. Examples of algorithm hyperparameters are learning rate and batch size as well as mini-batch size. Batch size can refer to the full data sample where mini-batch size would be a smaller sample set. Different model training algorithms require different hyperparameters, some simple algorithms (such as ordinary least squares regression) require none. Given these hyperparameters, the training algorithm learns the parameters from the data. For instance, LASSO is an algorithm that adds a regularization hyperparameter to ordinary least squares regression, which has to be set before estimating the parameters through the training algorithm. The time required to train and test a model can depend upon the choice of its hyperparameters. A hyperparameter is usually of continuous or integer type, leading to mixed-type optimization problems. The existence of some hyperparameters is conditional upon the value of others, e.g. the size of each hidden layer in a neural network can be conditional upon the number of layers. Usually, but not always, hyperparameters cannot be learned using well known gradient based methods (such as gradient descent, LBFGS) - which are commonly employed to learn parameters. These hyperparameters are those parameters describing a model representation that cannot be learned by common optimization methods but nonetheless affect the loss function. An example would be the tolerance hyperparameter for errors in support vector machines.

Official source

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperparameter_(machine_learning)

About this result

This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.

Related publications (5)

Related units (1)

Related concepts (3)

Related courses (17)

Related lectures (115)

Lifelong Machine Learning with Data Efficiency and Knowledge Retention

Fei Mi

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have become de facto tools in many real-life applications to offer a wide range of benefits for individuals and our society. A classic ML model is typically trained with a large-scale static dataset in an offline manner. Therefore, it can not quickly capture new knowledge in non-stationary environments, and it is difficult to maintain long-term memory for knowledge learned earlier. In practice, many ML systems often need to learn new knowledge (e.g., domains, tasks, distributions, etc.) as more data and experiences are collected, which is referred to as a lifelong ML paradigm in this thesis. We focus on two fundamental challenges to achieve lifelong learning. The first challenge is to quickly learn new knowledge with a small number of observations, and we refer to it as data efficiency. The second challenge is to prevent an ML system from forgetting the old knowledge it has previously learned, and we refer to this challenge as knowledge retention. These two capabilities are crucial for applying ML to most practical applications. In this thesis, we study three important applications with these two challenges, including recommendation systems, task-oriented dialog systems, and the image classification task. First, we propose two approaches to improve data efficiency for task-oriented dialog systems. The first proposed approach is based on Meta-learning, aiming to learn a better model parameter initialization from training data. It can quickly reach a good parameter region of new domains or tasks with a small number of labeled data. The second proposal takes a semi-supervised self-training approach to iteratively train a better model using sufficient unlabeled data when only a limited number of labeled data are available. We empirically demonstrate that both approaches effectively improve data efficiency to learn new knowledge. The second self-training method even consistently improves state-of-the-art large-scale pre-trained models. Second, we tackle the knowledge retention challenge to mitigate the detrimental catastrophic forgetting issue when neural networks learn new knowledge sequentially. We formulate and investigate the ``continual learning'' setting for task-oriented dialog systems and recommendation systems. Through extensive empirical evaluation and analysis, we demonstrate the importance of (1) exemplar replay: storing representative historical data and replaying them to the model while learning new knowledge; (2) dynamic regularization: applying a dynamic regularization term to put flexible constraints on not forgetting previously learned knowledge in each model update cycle. Lastly, we conduct several initial attempts to achieve both data efficiency and knowledge retention in a unified framework. In the recommendation scenario, we propose two approaches using different non-parametric memory modules to retain long-term knowledge. More importantly, the two proposed non-parametric predictions computed on top of them help learn and memorize new knowledge in a data-efficient manner. Apart from the recommendation scenario, we propose a probabilistic evaluation protocol in the widely studied image classification domain. It is general and versatile to simulate a wide range of realistic lifelong learning scenarios that require both knowledge retention and data efficiency for studying different techniques. Through experiments, we also demonstrate the benefit

EPFL2021

The way our brain learns to disentangle complex signals into unambiguous concepts is fascinating but remains largely unknown. There is evidence, however, that hierarchical neural representations play a key role in the cortex. This thesis investigates biologically plausible models of unsupervised learning of hierarchical representations as found in the brain and modern computer vision models. We use computational modeling to address three main questions at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and computational neuroscience.The first question is: What are useful neural representations and when are deep hierarchical representations needed? We approach this point with a systematic study of biologically plausible unsupervised feature learning in a shallow 2-layer networks on digit (MNIST) and object (CIFAR10) classification. Surprisingly, random features support high performance, especially for large hidden layers. When combined with localized receptive fields, random feature networks approach the performance of supervised backpropagation on MNIST, but not on CIFAR10. We suggest that future models of biologically plausible learning should outperform such random feature benchmarks on MNIST, or that such models should be evaluated in different ways.The second question is: How can hierarchical representations be learned with mechanisms supported by neuroscientific evidence? We cover this question by proposing a unifying Hebbian model, inspired by common models of V1 simple and complex cells based on unsupervised sparse coding and temporal invariance learning. In shallow 2-layer networks, our model reproduces learning of simple and complex cell receptive fields, as found in V1. In deeper networks, we stack multiple layers of Hebbian learning but find that it does not yield hierarchical representations of increasing usefulness. From this, we hypothesise that standard Hebbian rules are too constrained to build increasingly useful representations, as observed in higher areas of the visual cortex or deep artificial neural networks.The third question is: Can AI inspire learning models that build deep representations and are still biologically plausible? We address this question by proposing a learning rule that takes inspiration from neuroscience and recent advances in self-supervised deep learning. The proposed rule is Hebbian, i.e. only depends on pre- and post-synaptic neuronal activity, but includes additional local factors, namely predictive dendritic input and widely broadcasted modulation factors. Algorithmically, this rule applies self-supervised contrastive predictive learning to a causal, biological setting using saccades. We find that networks trained with this generalised Hebbian rule build deep hierarchical representations of images, speech and video.We see our modeling as a potential starting point for both, new hypotheses, that can be tested experimentally, and novel AI models that could benefit from added biological realism.

EPFL2021

Predicting Vessel Fuel Consumption using Machine Learning

Younes Bensaid

2020