A precedence graph, also named conflict graph and serializability graph, is used in the context of concurrency control in databases.
The precedence graph for a schedule S contains:
A node for each committed transaction in S
An arc from Ti to Tj if an action of Ti precedes and conflicts with one of Tj's actions. That is the actions belong to different transactions, at least one of the actions is a write operation, and the actions access the same object (read or write).
A precedence graph of the schedule D, with 3 transactions. As there is a cycle (of length 2; with two edges) through the committed transactions T1 and T2, this schedule (history) is not Conflict serializable.
Notice, that the commit of Transaction 2 does not have any meaning regarding the creation of a precedence graph.
Algorithm to test Conflict Serializability of a Schedule S along with an example schedule.
or
For each transaction Tx participating in schedule S, create a node labeled Ti in the precedence graph. Thus the precedence graph contains T1, T2, T3.
For each case in S where Tj executes a read_item(X) after Ti executes a write_item(X), create an edge (Ti → Tj) in the precedence graph. This occurs nowhere in the above example, as there is no read after write.
For each case in S where Tj executes a write_item(X) after Ti executes a read_item(X), create an edge (Ti → Tj) in the precedence graph. This results in a directed edge from T1 to T2 (as T1 has R(A) before T2 having W(A)).
For each case in S where Tj executes a write_item(X) after Ti executes a write_item(X), create an edge (Ti → Tj) in the precedence graph. This results in directed edges from T2 to T1, T2 to T3 and T1 to T3.
The schedule S is serializable if and only if the precedence graph has no cycles. As T1 and T2 constitute a cycle, the above example is not (conflict) serializable.
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.
In concurrency control of databases, transaction processing (transaction management), and other transactional distributed applications, global serializability (or modular serializability) is a property of a global schedule of transactions. A global schedule is the unified schedule of all the individual database (and other transactional object) schedules in a multidatabase environment (e.g., federated database).
In information technology and computer science, especially in the fields of computer programming, operating systems, multiprocessors, and databases, concurrency control ensures that correct results for concurrent operations are generated, while getting those results as quickly as possible. Computer systems, both software and hardware, consist of modules, or components. Each component is designed to operate correctly, i.e., to obey or to meet certain consistency rules.
This course provides a deep understanding of the concepts behind data management systems. It covers fundamental data management topics such as system architecture, data models, query processing and op
This course is intended for students who want to understand modern large-scale data analysis systems and database systems. It covers a wide range of topics and technologies, and will prepare students
The popular isolation level multiversion Read Committed (RC) exchanges some of the strong guarantees of serializability for increased transaction throughput. Nevertheless, transaction workloads can sometimes be executed under RC while still guaranteeing se ...
ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY2023
, ,
Transactions can simplify distributed applications by hiding data distribution, concurrency, and failures from the application developer. Ideally the developer would see the abstraction of a single large machine that runs transactions sequentially and neve ...
We establish a theorem called the PCL theorem, which states that it is impossible to design a transactional memory algorithm that ensures (1) parallelism, i.e., transactions do not need to synchronize unless they access the same application objects, (2) ve ...