Bruno Emanuel Ferreira De Sousa Correia

Throughout my PhD and postdoctoral studies I was trained in world-renowned laboratories and institutions in the United States of America (University of Washington and The Scripps Research Institute). Very early in my scientific career I found out my fascination about protein structure and function. My PhD studies evolved in the direction of immunogen design and vaccine engineering which sparked my interest in the many needs and opportunities in vaccinology and translational research. My efforts resulted in an enlightening piece of work where for the first time, computationally designed immunogens elicited potent neutralizing antibodies. During my postdoctoral studies I joined a chemical biology laboratory at the Scripps Research Institute. In this stage I developed novel chemoproteomics methods for the identification of protein-small molecule interaction sites in complex proteomes. In March 2015, I joined the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) – Switzerland as a tenure track assistant professor. The focus of my research group is to develop computational tools for protein design with particular emphasis in applying these strategies to immunoengineering (e.g. vaccine and cancer immunotherapy). The activities in my laboratory focus on computational design methods development and experimental characterization of the designed proteins. Our laboratory has been awarded with 2 prestigious research grants from the European Research Council. Lastly, I have been awarded the prize for best teacher of Life sciences in 2019.

De novo design of protein interactions with learned surface fingerprints

Michael Bronstein, Stephen M Buckley, Bruno Emanuel Ferreira De Sousa Correia, Beat Fierz, Pablo Gainza Cirauqui, Sandrine Madeleine Suzanne Georgeon, Casper Alexander Goverde, Zander Harteveld, Anthony Marchand, Jane Marsden, Dongchun Ni, Elisa Oricchio, Aaron Simone Petruzzella, Charlène Mireille Raymonde Raclot, Stéphane Rosset, Andreas Scheck, Henning Paul-Julius Stahlberg, Freyr Sverrisson, Alexandra Teslenko, Didier Trono, Priscilla Turelli, Alexandra Krina Van Hall-Beauvais, Sarah Wehrle

Physical interactions between proteins are essential for most biological processes governing life. However, the molecular determinants of such interactions have been challenging to understand, even as genomic, proteomic and structural data increase. This knowledge gap has been a major obstacle for the comprehensive understanding of cellular protein–protein interaction networks and for the de novo design of protein binders that are crucial for synthetic biology and translational applications. Here we use a geometric deep-learning framework operating on protein surfaces that generates fingerprints to describe geometric and chemical features that are critical to drive protein–protein interactions10. We hypothesized that these fingerprints capture the key aspects of molecular recognition that represent a new paradigm in the computational design of novel protein interactions. As a proof of principle, we computationally designed several de novo protein binders to engage four protein targets: SARS-CoV-2 spike, PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4. Several designs were experimentally optimized, whereas others were generated purely in silico, reaching nanomolar affinity with structural and mutational characterization showing highly accurate predictions. Overall, our surface-centric approach captures the physical and chemical determinants of molecular recognition, enabling an approach for the de novo design of protein interactions and, more broadly, of artificial proteins with function.

2023

De novo protein design by inversion of the AlphaFold structure prediction network

Bruno Emanuel Ferreira De Sousa Correia, Casper Alexander Goverde, Stéphane Rosset

De novo protein design enhances our understanding of the principles that govern protein folding and interactions, and has the potential to revolutionize biotechnology through the engineering of novel protein functionalities. Despite recent progress in computational design strategies, de novo design of protein structures remains challenging, given the vast size of the sequence-structure space. AlphaFold2 (AF2), a state-of-the-art neural network architecture, achieved remarkable accuracy in predicting protein structures from amino acid sequences. This raises the question whether AF2 has learned the principles of protein folding sufficiently for de novo design. Here, we sought to answer this question by inverting the AF2 network, using the prediction weight set and a loss function to bias the generated sequences to adopt a target fold. Initial design trials resulted in de novo designs with an overrepresentation of hydrophobic residues on the protein surface compared to their natural protein family, requiring additional surface optimization. In silico validation of the designs showed protein structures with the correct fold, a hydrophilic surface and a densely packed hydrophobic core. In vitro validation showed that seven out of 39 designs were folded and stable in solution with high melting temperatures. In summary, our design workflow solely based on AF2 does not seem to fully capture basic principles of de novo protein design, as observed in the protein surface's hydrophobic vs. hydrophilic patterning. However, with minimal post-design intervention, these pipelines generated viable sequences as assessed experimental characterization. Thus such pipelines show the potential to contribute to solving outstanding challenges in de novo protein design.

2023

Discriminating physiological from non‐physiological interfaces in structures of protein complexes: A community‐wide study

Bruno Emanuel Ferreira De Sousa Correia, Anthony Marchand, Xiao Wang

Reliably scoring and ranking candidate models of protein complexes and assigning their oligomeric state from the structure of the crystal lattice represent outstanding challenges. A community-wide effort was launched to tackle these challenges. The latest resources on protein complexes and interfaces were exploited to derive a benchmark dataset consisting of 1677 homodimer protein crystal structures, including a balanced mix of physiological and non-physiological complexes. The non-physiological complexes in the benchmark were selected to bury a similar or larger interface area than their physiological counterparts, making it more difficult for scoring functions to differentiate between them. Next, 252 functions for scoring protein-protein interfaces previously developed by 13 groups were collected and evaluated for their ability to discriminate between physiological and non-physiological complexes. A simple consensus score generated using the best performing score of each of the 13 groups, and a cross-validated Random Forest (RF) classifier were created. Both approaches showed excellent performance, with an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.93 and 0.94, respectively, outperforming individual scores developed by different groups. Additionally, AlphaFold2 engines recalled the physiological dimers with significantly higher accuracy than the non-physiological set, lending support to the reliability of our benchmark dataset annotations. Optimizing the combined power of interface scoring functions and evaluating it on challenging benchmark datasets appears to be a promising strategy.

2023