Are you an EPFL student looking for a semester project?
Work with us on data science and visualisation projects, and deploy your project as an app on top of Graph Search.
Concept
Universal set
Summary
In set theory, a universal set is a set which contains all objects, including itself. In set theory as usually formulated, it can be proven in multiple ways that a universal set does not exist. However, some non-standard variants of set theory include a universal set.
Many set theories do not allow for the existence of a universal set. There are several different arguments for its non-existence, based on different choices of axioms for set theory.
In Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory, the axiom of regularity and axiom of pairing prevent any set from containing itself. For any set , the set (constructed using pairing) necessarily contains an element disjoint from , by regularity. Because its only element is , it must be the case that is disjoint from , and therefore that does not contain itself. Because a universal set would necessarily contain itself, it cannot exist under these axioms.
Russell's paradox
Russell's paradox prevents the existence of a universal set in set theories that include Zermelo's axiom of comprehension.
This axiom states that, for any formula and any set , there exists a set
that contains exactly those elements of that satisfy .
As a consequence of this axiom, to every set there corresponds another set consisting of the elements of that do not contain themselves. cannot contain itself, because it consists only of sets that do not contain themselves. It cannot be a member of , because if it were it would be included as a member of itself, by its definition, contradicting the fact that it cannot contain itself. Therefore, every set is non-universal: there exists a set that it does not contain. This indeed holds even with predicative comprehension and over intuitionistic logic.
Cantor's theorem
Another difficulty with the idea of a universal set concerns the power set of the set of all sets. Because this power set is a set of sets, it would necessarily be a subset of the set of all sets, provided that both exist. However, this conflicts with Cantor's theorem that the power set of any set (whether infinite or not) always has strictly higher cardinality than the set itself.
Official source
About this result
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.
Ontological neighbourhood
Related courses (39)
MATH-436: Homotopical algebra
This course will provide an introduction to model category theory, which is an abstract framework for generalizing homotopy theory beyond topological spaces and continuous maps. We will study numerous
MATH-410: Riemann surfaces
This course is an introduction to the theory of Riemann surfaces. Riemann surfaces naturally appear is mathematics in many different ways: as a result of analytic continuation, as quotients of complex
COM-406: Foundations of Data Science
We discuss a set of topics that are important for the understanding of modern data science but that are typically not taught in an introductory ML course. In particular we discuss fundamental ideas an
Related publications (380)
Related people (37)
Related concepts (16)
New Foundations
In mathematical logic, New Foundations (NF) is an axiomatic set theory, conceived by Willard Van Orman Quine as a simplification of the theory of types of Principia Mathematica. Quine first proposed NF in a 1937 article titled "New Foundations for Mathematical Logic"; hence the name. Much of this entry discusses NF with urelements (NFU), an important variant of NF due to Jensen and clarified by Holmes. In 1940 and in a revision in 1951, Quine introduced an extension of NF sometimes called "Mathematical Logic" or "ML", that included proper classes as well as sets.
Axiom schema of specification
In many popular versions of axiomatic set theory, the axiom schema of specification, also known as the axiom schema of separation, subset axiom scheme or axiom schema of restricted comprehension is an axiom schema. Essentially, it says that any definable subclass of a set is a set. Some mathematicians call it the axiom schema of comprehension, although others use that term for unrestricted comprehension, discussed below.
Axiom of regularity
In mathematics, the axiom of regularity (also known as the axiom of foundation) is an axiom of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory that states that every non-empty set A contains an element that is disjoint from A. In first-order logic, the axiom reads: The axiom of regularity together with the axiom of pairing implies that no set is an element of itself, and that there is no infinite sequence (an) such that ai+1 is an element of ai for all i.
Related MOOCs (26)
Introduction to optimization on smooth manifolds: first order methods
Learn to optimize on smooth, nonlinear spaces: Join us to build your foundations (starting at "what is a manifold?") and confidently implement your first algorithm (Riemannian gradient descent).
Information, Calcul, Communication: Introduction à la pensée informatique
Dans une première partie, nous étudierons d’abord comment résoudre de manière très concrète un problème au moyen d’un algorithme, ce qui nous amènera dans un second temps à une des grandes questions d
Information, Calcul, Communication: Introduction à la pensée informatique
Dans une première partie, nous étudierons d’abord comment résoudre de manière très concrète un problème au moyen d’un algorithme, ce qui nous amènera dans un second temps à une des grandes questions d