Are you an EPFL student looking for a semester project?
Work with us on data science and visualisation projects, and deploy your project as an app on top of Graph Search.
Concept
Holstein–Primakoff transformation
Summary
In quantum mechanics, the Holstein–Primakoff transformation is a mapping between to the spin operators from boson creation and annihilation operators, effectively truncating their infinite-dimensional Fock space to finite-dimensional subspaces.
One important aspect of quantum mechanics is the occurrence of—in general—non-commuting operators which represent observables, quantities that can be measured.
A standard example of a set of such operators are the three components of the angular momentum operators, which are crucial in many quantum systems.
These operators are complicated, and one would like to find a simpler representation, which can be used to generate approximate calculational schemes.
The transformation was developed in 1940 by Theodore Holstein, a graduate student at the time, and Henry Primakoff. This method has found widespread applicability and has been extended in many different directions.
There is a close link to other methods of boson mapping of operator algebras: in particular, the (non-Hermitian) Dyson–Maleev technique, and to a lesser extent the Jordan–Schwinger map. There is, furthermore, a close link to the theory of (generalized) coherent states in Lie algebras.
The basic idea can be illustrated for the basic example of spin operators of quantum mechanics.
For any set of right-handed orthogonal axes, define the components of this vector operator as , and , which are mutually noncommuting, i.e., and its cyclic permutations.
In order to uniquely specify the states of a spin, one may diagonalise any set of commuting operators. Normally one uses the SU(2) Casimir operators and , which leads to
states with the quantum numbers ,
The projection quantum number takes on all the values .
Consider a single particle of spin s (i.e., look at a single irreducible representation of SU(2)). Now take the state with maximal projection , the extremal weight state as a vacuum for a set of boson operators, and each subsequent state with lower projection quantum number as a boson excitation of the previous one,
Each additional boson then corresponds to a decrease of ħ in the spin projection.
About this result
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.