Distributive justice

Distributive justice concerns the socially just allocation of resources, goods, opportunity in a society. It is concerned with how to allocate resources fairly among members of a society, taking into account factors such as wealth, income, and social status. Often contrasted with just process, which is concerned with the administration of law, distributive justice concentrates on outcomes. This subject has been given considerable attention in philosophy and the social sciences. Theorists have developed widely different conceptions of distributive justice. These have contributed to debates around the arrangement of social, political and economic institutions to promote the just distribution of benefits and burdens within a society. Most contemporary theories of distributive justice rest on the precondition of material scarcity. From that precondition arises the need for principles to resolve competing interest and claims concerning a just or at least morally preferable distribution of scarce resources. In social psychology, distributive justice is defined as perceived fairness of how rewards and costs are shared by (distributed across) group members. For example, when some workers work more hours but receive the same pay, group members may feel that distributive justice has not occurred. To determine whether distributive justice has taken place, individuals often turn to the behavioral expectations of their group. If rewards and costs are allocated according to the designated distributive norms of the group, distributive justice has occurred. Five types of distributive norm are defined by Donelson R. Forsyth: Equality: Regardless of their inputs, all group members should be given an equal share of the rewards/costs. Equality supports that someone who contributes 20% of the group's resources should receive as much as someone who contributes 60%. Equity: Members' outcomes should be based upon their inputs. Therefore, an individual who has invested a large amount of input (e.g.

Discussion of three definitions of spatial justice in the writing of Jacques Lévy

Ana Moura Bastos de Fernandes Póvoas

This text address the challenge of answering to two inseparable question: What is a just territory ? and What can we do to approach more just territories? The first section of this text explores three approaches of spatial justice as deployed by Jacques Lé ...

2013

Distributional justice, effectiveness, and costs of current and alternative solar PV incentive schemes in Switzerland

Discussion of three definitions of spatial justice in the writing of Jacques Lévy

Challenges in Algorithmic Mechanism Design

Challenges in Algorithmic Mechanism Design

Discussion of three definitions of spatial justice in the writing of Jacques Lévy

Distributional justice, effectiveness, and costs of current and alternative solar PV incentive schemes in Switzerland