History of natural language processing

Summary

The history of natural language processing describes the advances of natural language processing (Outline of natural language processing). There is some overlap with the history of machine translation, the history of speech recognition, and the history of artificial intelligence. Research and development The history of machine translation dates back to the seventeenth century, when philosophers such as Leibniz and Descartes put forward proposals for codes which would relate words between languages. All of these proposals remained theoretical, and none resulted in the development of an actual machine. The first patents for "translating machines" were applied for in the mid-1930s. One proposal, by Georges Artsrouni was simply an automatic bilingual dictionary using paper tape. The other proposal, by Peter Troyanskii, a Russian, was more detailed. It included both the bilingual dictionary, and a method for dealing with grammatical roles between languages, based on Esperanto

Official source

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_natural_language_processing

About this result

This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.

Related publications (2)

Related publications

Related people

Related units

Related concepts (3)

Related concepts

Related courses (3)

Related courses

Related lectures (7)

Related lectures

This work deals with models used, or usable in the domain of Automatic Natural Language Processing, when one seeks a syntactic interpretation of a statement. This interpretation can be used as additional information for subsequent treatments, that can aim for instance at producing a semantic representation of the statement. It can also be used as a filter to select utterances belonging to a specific language, among several hypotheses, as done in Automatic Speech Recognition. As the syntactic interpretation of a statement is generally ambiguous with natural languages, the probabilisation of the space of syntactic trees can help in the analysis task : when several analyses are competing, one can then extract the most probable interpretation, or classify interpretations according to their probabilities. We are interested here in the probabilistic versions of Context-Free Grammars (PCFGs) and Substitution Tree Grammar (PTSGs). Syntactic treebanks, which as much as possible account for the language we wish to model, serve as the basis for defining the probabilistic parameters of such grammars. First, we exhibit in this thesis some drawbacks of the usual learning paradigms, due to the use of arbitrary heuristics (STSG DOP model), or to the use of learning criteria that consider these grammars as generative ones (creation of sentences from the grammar) rather than dedicated to analysis (creation of analyses from the sentence). In a second time, we propose new methods for training grammars, based on the traditional Maximum Entropy and Maximum Likelihood criteria. These criteria are instanciated so that they correspond to a syntactic analysis task rather than a language generation task. Specific training algorithms are necessary for their implementation, but traditional algorithms can cope with those models for the task of syntactic analysis. Lastly, we invest the problem of time complexity of syntactic analysis, which is a real issue for the effective use of PTSGs. We describe classes of PTSGs that allow the analysis of a sentence in polynomial complexity. We finally describe a method that enable the extraction of such a PTSG from the set of subtrees of a treebank. The PTSG produced by this method allows us to test our non-generative learning criterium on "realistic" data, and to give a statistical comparison between this criterium and the usual heuristic criterium in term of analysis performance.

EPFL2003

Semantic Vector Machines

Vincent Etter

We first present our work in machine translation, during which we used aligned sentences to train a neural network to embed n-grams of different languages into an d-dimensional space, such that n-grams that are the translation of each other are close with respect to some metric. Good n-grams to n-grams translation results were achieved, but full sentences translation is still problematic. We realized that learning semantics of sentences and documents was the key for solving a lot of natural language processing problems, and thus moved to the second part of our work: sentence compression. We introduce a flexible neural network architecture for learning embeddings of words and sentences that extract their semantics, propose an efficient implementation in the Torch framework and present embedding results comparable to the ones obtained with classical neural language models, while being more powerful.

2009

EPFL2003