Barnette's conjecture

Barnette's conjecture is an unsolved problem in graph theory, a branch of mathematics, concerning Hamiltonian cycles in graphs. It is named after David W. Barnette, a professor emeritus at the University of California, Davis; it states that every bipartite polyhedral graph with three edges per vertex has a Hamiltonian cycle. A planar graph is an undirected graph that can be embedded into the Euclidean plane without any crossings. A planar graph is called polyhedral if and only if it is 3-vertex-connected, that is, if there do not exist two vertices the removal of which would disconnect the rest of the graph. A graph is bipartite if its vertices can be colored with two different colors such that each edge has one endpoint of each color. A graph is cubic (or 3-regular) if each vertex is the endpoint of exactly three edges. Finally, a graph is Hamiltonian if there exists a cycle that passes through each of its vertices exactly once. Barnette's conjecture states that every cubic bipartite polyhedral graph is Hamiltonian. By Steinitz's theorem, a planar graph represents the edges and vertices of a convex polyhedron if and only if it is polyhedral. A three-dimensional polyhedron has a cubic graph if and only if it is a simple polyhedron. And, a planar graph is bipartite if and only if, in a planar embedding of the graph, all face cycles have even length. Therefore, Barnette's conjecture may be stated in an equivalent form: suppose that a three-dimensional simple convex polyhedron has an even number of edges on each of its faces. Then, according to the conjecture, the graph of the polyhedron has a Hamiltonian cycle. conjectured that every cubic polyhedral graph is Hamiltonian; this came to be known as Tait's conjecture. It was disproven by , who constructed a counterexample with 46 vertices; other researchers later found even smaller counterexamples. However, none of these known counterexamples is bipartite. Tutte himself conjectured that every cubic 3-connected bipartite graph is Hamiltonian, but this was shown to be false by the discovery of a counterexample, the Horton graph.