This is a list of rules of inference, logical laws that relate to mathematical formulae.
Rules of inference are syntactical transform rules which one can use to infer a conclusion from a premise to create an argument. A set of rules can be used to infer any valid conclusion if it is complete, while never inferring an invalid conclusion, if it is sound. A sound and complete set of rules need not include every rule in the following list, as many of the rules are redundant, and can be proven with the other rules.
Discharge rules permit inference from a subderivation based on a temporary assumption. Below, the notation
indicates such a subderivation from the temporary assumption to .
Reductio ad absurdum (or Negation Introduction)
Reductio ad absurdum (related to the law of excluded middle)
Ex contradictione quodlibet
Deduction theorem (or Conditional Introduction)
Modus ponens (or Conditional Elimination)
Modus tollens
Adjunction (or Conjunction Introduction)
Simplification (or Conjunction Elimination)
Addition (or Disjunction Introduction)
Case analysis (or Proof by Cases or Argument by Cases or Disjunction elimination)
Disjunctive syllogism
Constructive dilemma
Biconditional introduction
Biconditional elimination
In the following rules, is exactly like except for having the term wherever has the free variable .
Universal Generalization (or Universal Introduction)
Restriction 1: is a variable which does not occur in .
Restriction 2: is not mentioned in any hypothesis or undischarged assumptions.
Universal Instantiation (or Universal Elimination)
Restriction: No free occurrence of in falls within the scope of a quantifier quantifying a variable occurring in .
Existential Generalization (or Existential Introduction)
Restriction: No free occurrence of in falls within the scope of a quantifier quantifying a variable occurring in .
Existential Instantiation (or Existential Elimination)
Restriction 1: is a variable which does not occur in .
Restriction 2: There is no occurrence, free or bound, of in .
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.
In predicate logic, universal instantiation (UI; also called universal specification or universal elimination, and sometimes confused with dictum de omni) is a valid rule of inference from a truth about each member of a class of individuals to the truth about a particular individual of that class. It is generally given as a quantification rule for the universal quantifier but it can also be encoded in an axiom schema. It is one of the basic principles used in quantification theory. Example: "All dogs are mammals.
We introduce the first program synthesis engine implemented inside an SMT solver. We present an approach that extracts solution functions from unsatisfiability proofs of the negated form of synthesis conjectures. We also discuss novel counterexample-guided ...
SPRINGER2019
,
Universal inference enables the construction of confidence intervals and tests without regularity conditions by splitting the data into two parts and appealing to Markov's inequality. Previous investigations have shown that the cost of this generality is a ...
WILEY2022
,
We introduce the first program synthesis engine implemented inside an SMT solver. We present an approach that extracts solution functions from unsatisfiability proofs of the negated form of synthesis conjectures. We also discuss novel counterexample-guided ...