DNA damage (naturally occurring)

DNA damage is an alteration in the chemical structure of DNA, such as a break in a strand of DNA, a nucleobase missing from the backbone of DNA, or a chemically changed base such as 8-OHdG. DNA damage can occur naturally or via environmental factors, but is distinctly different from mutation, although both are types of error in DNA. DNA damage is an abnormal chemical structure in DNA, while a mutation is a change in the sequence of base pairs. DNA damages cause changes in the structure of the genetic material and prevents the replication mechanism from functioning and performing properly. The DNA damage response (DDR) is a complex signal transduction pathway which recognizes when DNA is damaged and initiates the cellular response to the damage. DNA damage and mutation have different biological consequences. While most DNA damages can undergo DNA repair, such repair is not 100% efficient. Un-repaired DNA damages accumulate in non-replicating cells, such as cells in the brains or musc

Chk1 instability is coupled to mitotic cell death of p53-deficient cells in response to virus-induced DNA damage signaling

Peter Martin Beard, Michail Fragkos

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) DNA, by mimicking a stalled replication fork, provokes a DNA damage response that can arrest cells in the G2/M phase of the cell-cycle. This response depends strictly on DNA damage signaling kinases ATR and Chk1. Here, we used AAV to study long-term effects of DNA damage signaling in cells with altered p53 status. In HCT116 cells, in response to damage signaling, p53 represses transcription of the genes encoding mitotic regulators Cdc25C, cyclin B1, and Plk1 to establish a firm G2 arrest. Isogenic cells lacking p53 maintain these three proteins at constant levels yet can still arrest initially in G2 because Chk1 signaling inhibits their enzymatic activities. Unexpectedly, the levels of Chk1 fall abruptly in a proteasome-dependent manner after two days of arrest in G2. In p53-deficient cells, this Chk1 instability is coupled to recovery of the phosphatase activity of Cdc25C and in the kinase activities of Plk1 and Cdk1/cyclin B1. Consequently, the p53-deficient cells enter lethal mitosis. Thus, the Chk1-mediated arrest is transient: it initially causes cells to accumulate in G2 until p53-dependent transcriptional repression of mitotic proteins takes over. p53-deficient cells cannot maintain the DNA damage signaling-induced G2 arrest after Chk1 has disappeared, and continue into catastrophic mitosis. Restoring Chk1 prevents the cells from entering such mitosis. These results reveal a mechanism based on Chk1 stability that regulates mitotic entry after DNA damage and elucidate the controversial phenomenon of p53-promoted cell survival in the face of damage signaling.

2007

Recombinant Adeno-Associated viral vectors are deficient in provoking a DNA damage response

Peter Martin Beard, Michail Fragkos

Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2) provokes a DNA damage response that mimics a stalled replication fork. We have previously shown that this response is dependent on ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3- related kinase and involves recruitment of DNA repair proteins into foci associated with AAV2 DNA. Here, we investigated whether recombinant AAV2 (rAAV2) vectors are able to produce a similar response. Surprisingly, the results show that both single-stranded and double-stranded green fluorescent protein-expressing rAAV2 vectors are defective in producing such a response. We show that the DNA damage signaling initiated by AAV2 was not due to the virus-encoded Rep or viral capsid proteins. UV-inactivated AAV2 induced a response similar to that of untreated AAV2. This type of DNA damage response was not provoked by other DNA molecules, such as single-stranded bacteriophage M13 or plasmid DNAs. Rather, the results indicate that the ability of AAV2 to produce a DNA damage response can be attributed to the presence of cis-acting AAV2 DNA sequences, which are absent in rAAV2 vectors and could function as origins of replication creating stalled replication complexes. This hypothesis was tested by using a single-stranded rAAV2 vector containing the p5 AAV2 sequence that has previously been shown to enhance AAV2 replication. This vector was indeed able to trigger DNA damage signaling. These findings support the conclusion that efficient formation of AAV2 replication complexes is required for this AAV2-induced DNA damage response and provide an explanation for the poor response in rAAV2-infected cells.

2008

On the replication of adeno-associated virus in the presence or absence of viral helper functions

Anika Ekrut

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a small non-enveloped virus and as a member of the parvovirus family, it contains a single stranded DNA genome. AAV's life cycle in vitro is strongly dependent not only on cellular factors but also on helper functions provided by other viruses, for example adenovirus, herpes virus and, to a certain extent, papillomavirus (HPV). Although AAVs are wide spread throughout the human population, no disease is yet associated with them. Accordingly, AAV became attractive as a vector for gene therapy studies, but even though the virus is well studied in vitro and now used in clinical trials as a vector, not much is known about AAV infection in vivo. AAV was initially isolated from humans together with its helper adenovirus. However, adenovirus-independent replication of AAV has been reported for a number of cellular situations, including differentiating keratinocytes with or without the presence of HPV, and in cells with an activated DNA damage response due to genotoxic agents. In the work reported here we have undertaken a systematic study of these alternative helper activities with a view to evaluating their contribution to natural infections by AAV. We used three different systems of cultured keratinocytes and showed that in each case in vitro differentiation was achieved. In two of these, the cells were from HPV-induced lesions. We found that AAV replicates efficiently in differentiating monolayer foreskin keratinocytes in the presence but not in the absence of adenovirus. Likewise naturally HPV-infected cervical keratinocytes only support the full life cycle of AAV if adenovirus is present. Even though HPV can provide certain helper functions, it is less efficient as a helper than adenovirus. We also exploited osteosarcoma cells, which are particularly well infected by AAV. Our results indicate that U2OS osteosarcoma cells are semi-permissive for AAV growth. Induction of a DNA damage response in these cells, or in HPV-containing keratinocytes, stimulates AAV genome amplification. Although AAV replication in the absence of helper virus can readily be demonstrated, this is either at a relatively low level or limited to part of the AAV growth cycle. We conclude that although these alternative helper systems can contribute to the natural history of AAV, the presence of an efficient helper virus seems likely to be needed for AAV to persist in the human population.

EPFL2009

On the replication of adeno-associated virus in the presence or absence of viral helper functions

Anika Ekrut

EPFL2009