Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.
DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.
Consider a network with an arbitrary topology and arbitrary communication delays, in which congestion control is based on additive--increase and multiplicative--decrease. We show that the source rates tend to be distributed in order to maximize an objectiv ...
We study the fairness of TCP Vegas. The latter is an alternative to the commonly used TCP Reno, and uses measures of the round trip time as feedback on congestion. We consider two cases that depend on the value of the two parameters α and β co ...
We study the fairness of TCP Vegas. The latter is an alternative to the commonly used TCP Reno, and uses measures of the round trip time as feedback on congestion. We consider two cases that depend on the value of the two parameters alpha and beta controll ...
Forward Error Correction copes with packet losses, but at the expense of an increase of the end-to-end delay. By failing to take this into account, existing error control schemes for audio often lead to end-to-end delays larger than 150 ms, which has an im ...
Consider a network with an arbitrary topology and arbitrary communication delays, in which congestion control is based on additive-increase and multiplicative-decrease. We show that the source rates tend to be distributed in order to maximize an objective ...