**Are you an EPFL student looking for a semester project?**

Work with us on data science and visualisation projects, and deploy your project as an app on top of GraphSearch.

Person# Mikko Tapani Korhonen

This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.

Related units

Loading

Courses taught by this person

Loading

Related research domains

Loading

Related publications

Loading

People doing similar research

Loading

Courses taught by this person

No results

Related research domains (3)

Linear algebraic group

In mathematics, a linear algebraic group is a subgroup of the group of invertible n\times n matrices (under matrix multiplication) that is defined by polynomial equations. An example i

Irreducible polynomial

In mathematics, an irreducible polynomial is, roughly speaking, a polynomial that cannot be factored into the product of two non-constant polynomials. The property of irreducibility depends on the n

Algebraic group

In mathematics, an algebraic group is an algebraic variety endowed with a group structure that is compatible with its structure as an algebraic variety. Thus the study of algebraic groups belongs bot

Related publications (4)

Loading

Loading

Loading

People doing similar research (6)

Related units (3)

Let $G$ be a classical group with natural module $V$ over an algebraically closed field of good characteristic. For every unipotent element $u$ of $G$, we describe the Jordan block sizes of $u$ on the irreducible $G$-modules which occur as composition factors of $V \otimes V^*$, $\wedge ^2(V)$, and $S^2(V)$. Our description is given in terms of the Jordan block sizes of the tensor square, exterior square, and the symmetric square of $u$, for which recursive formulae are known.

2019Let $G$ be a simple linear algebraic group over an algebraically closed field $K$ of characteristic $p \geq 0$. In this thesis, we investigate closed connected reductive subgroups $X < G$ that contain a given distinguished unipotent element $u$ of $G$. Our main result is the classification of all such $X$ that are maximal among the closed connected subgroups of $G$.
When $G$ is simple of exceptional type, the result is easily read from the tables computed by Lawther (J. Algebra, 2009). Our focus is then on the case where $G$ is simple of classical type, say $G = \operatorname{SL}(V)$, $G = \operatorname{Sp}(V)$, or $G = \operatorname{SO}(V)$. We begin by considering the maximal closed connected subgroups $X$ of $G$ which belong to one of the families of the so-called \emph{geometric subgroups}. Here the only difficult case is the one where $X$ is the stabilizer of a tensor decomposition of $V$. For $p = 2$ and $X = \operatorname{Sp}(V_1) \otimes \operatorname{Sp}(V_2)$, we solve the problem with explicit calculations; for the other tensor product subgroups we apply a result of Barry (Comm. Algebra, 2015).
After the geometric subgroups, the maximal closed connected subgroups that remain are the $X < G$ such that $X$ is simple and $V$ is an irreducible and tensor indecomposable $X$-module. The bulk of this thesis is concerned with this case. We determine all triples $(X, u, \varphi)$ where $X$ is a simple algebraic group, $u \in X$ is a unipotent element, and $\varphi: X \rightarrow G$ is a rational irreducible representation such that $\varphi(u)$ is a distinguished unipotent element of $G$. When $p = 0$, this was done in previous work by Liebeck, Seitz and Testerman (Pac. J. Math, 2015).
In the final chapter of the thesis, we consider the more general problem of finding all connected reductive subgroups $X$ of $G$ that contain a distinguished unipotent element $u$ of $G$. This leads us to consider connected reductive overgroups $X$ of $u$ which are contained in some proper parabolic subgroup of $G$. Testerman and Zalesski (Proc. Am. Math. Soc, 2013) have shown that when $u$ is a regular unipotent element of $G$, no such $X$ exists. We give several examples which show that their result does not generalize to distinguished unipotent elements. As an extension of the Testerman-Zalesski result, we show that except for two known examples which occur in the case where $(G, p) = (C_2, 2)$, a connected reductive overgroup of a distinguished unipotent element of order $p$ cannot be contained in a proper parabolic subgroup of $G$.