Online Broadcasting with Network Coding

Christina Fragouli, Lorenzo Keller
2008
Conference paper

Consider a source broadcasting M packets to N receivers over independent erasure channels, where perfect feedback is available from the receivers to the source, and the source is allowed to use coding. We investigate offline and online algorithms that optimize delay, both through theoretical analysis as well as simulation results.

About this result

This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.

Related concepts

Related publications

Christina Fragouli, Lorenzo Keller
2008
Conference paper

Abstract

Official source

https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/142420?ln=en

About this result

Related concepts (7)

Related concepts

Related publications (4)

Related publications

Linear network coding

In computer networking, linear network coding is a program in which intermediate nodes transmit data from source nodes to sink nodes by means of linear combinations. Linear network coding may be use

Online algorithm

In computer science, an online algorithm is one that can process its input piece-by-piece in a serial fashion, i.e., in the order that the input is fed to the algorithm, without

Broadcasting

Broadcasting is the distribution of audio or video content to a dispersed audience via any electronic mass communications medium, but typically one using the electromagnetic spectrum (radio waves), i

Real-time Delay with Network Coding and Feedback

Christina Fragouli, Lorenzo Keller

We consider the problem of minimizing delay when broadcasting over erasure channels with feedback. A sender wishes to communicate the same set of m messages to several receivers. The sender can broadcast a single message or a combination (encoding) of messages to all receivers at each timestep, through separate erasure channels. Receivers provide feedback as to whether the transmission was received. If, at some time step, a receiver cannot identify a new message, delay is incurred. Our notion of delay is motivated by real-time applications that request progressively refined input, such as the refinements or different parts of an image. Our setup is novel because it combines coding techniques with feedback information to the end of minimizing delay. Uncoded scheduling or use of multiple description (MDS) codes has been well-studied in the literature. We show that our setup allows O( m ) benefits as compared to both previous approaches for offline algorithms, while feedback allows online algorithms to achieve smaller delay compared to online algorithms without feedback. Our main complexity results are that the offline minimization problem is NP-hard when the sender only schedules single messages and that the general problem remains NP-hard even when coding is allowed. However we show that coding does offer complexity gains by exhibiting specific classes of erasure instances that become trivial under coding schemes. We also discuss online heuristics and evaluate their performance through simulations.

2008

Delay with network coding and feedback

Christina Fragouli, Lorenzo Keller

We consider the problem of minimizing delay when broadcasting over erasure channels with feedback. A sender wishes to communicate the same set of mu messages to several receivers over separate erasure channels. The sender can broadcast a single message or a combination (encoding) of messages at each timestep. Receivers provide feedback as to whether the transmission was received. If at some time step a receiver cannot identify a new message, delay is incurred. Our notion of delay is motivated by real-time applications that request progressively refined input, such as the successive refinement of an image encoded using multiple description coding. Our setup is novel because it combines coding techniques with feedback information to the end of minimizing delay. It allows Theta(mu) benefits as compared to previous approaches for offline algorithms, while feedback allows online algorithms to achieve smaller delay than online algorithms without feedback. Our main complexity results are that the offline minimization problem is NP-hard when the sender only schedules single messages and that the general problem remains NP-hard even when coding is allowed. However we show that coding does offer delay and complexity gains over scheduling. We also discuss online heuristics and evaluate their performance through simulations.

Ieee Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Po Box 1331, Piscataway, Nj 08855-1331 Usa2009

Delay with network coding and feedback

Christina Fragouli, Lorenzo Keller

We consider the problem of minimizing delay when broadcasting over erasure channels with feedback. A sender wishes to communicate the same set of μ messages to several receivers over separate erasure channels. The sender can broad- cast a single message or a combination (encoding) of messages at each timestep. Receivers provide feedback as to whether the transmission was received. If at some time step a receiver cannot identify a new message, delay is incurred. Our notion of delay is motivated by real-time applications that request progressively refined input, such as the successive refinement of an image encoded using multiple description coding. Our setup is novel because it combines coding techniques with feedback information to the end of minimizing delay. It allows Θ(μ) benefits as compared to previous approaches for offline algorithms, while feedback allows online algorithms to achieve smaller delay than online algorithms without feedback. Our main complexity results are that the offline minimization problem is NP-hard when the sender only schedules single messages and that the general problem remains N P -hard even when coding is allowed. However we show that coding does offer delay and complexity gains over scheduling. We also discuss online heuristics and evaluate their performance through simulations.

2009