Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain functional networks through neurofeedback

Recent fMRI studies demonstrated that functional connectivity is altered following cognitive tasks (e.g., learning) or due to various neurological disorders. We tested whether real-time fMRI-based neurofeedback can be a tool to voluntarily reconfigure brain network interactions. To disentangle learning-related from regulation-related effects, we first trained participants to voluntarily regulate activity in the auditory cortex (training phase) and subsequently asked participants to exert learned voluntary self-regulation in the-absence of feedback (transfer phase without learning). Using independent component analysis (ICA), we found network reconfigurations (increases in functional network connectivity) during the neurofeedback training phase between the auditory target region and (I) the auditory pathway; (2) visual regions related to visual feedback processing; (3) insula related to introspection and self-regulation and (4) working memory and high-level visual attention areas related to cognitive effort. Interestingly, the auditory target region was identified as the hub of the reconfigured functional networks without a-priori assumptions. During the transfer phase, we again found specific functional connectivity reconfiguration between auditory and attention network confirming the specific effect of self-regulation on functional connectivity. Functional connectivity to working memory related networks was no longer altered consistent with the absent demand on working memory. We demonstrate that neurofeedback learning is mediated by widespread changes in functional connectivity. In contrast, applying learned self-regulation involves more limited and specific network changes in an auditory setup intended as a model for tinnitus. Hence, neurofeedback training might be used to promote recovery from neurological disorders that are linked to abnormal patterns of brain connectivity. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Recovery of the default mode network after demanding neurofeedback training occurs in spatio-temporally segregated subnetworks

Sven Haller, Rotem Roza Kopel, Dimitri Nestor Alice Van De Ville

The default mode (DM) network is a major large-scale cerebral network that can be identified with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during resting state. Most studies consider functional connectivity networks as stationary phenomena. Consequently, the transient behavior of the DM network and its subnetworks is still largely unexplored. Most functional connectivity fMRI studies assess the steady state of resting without any task. To specifically investigate the recovery of the DM network during the transition from activation to rest, we implemented a cognitively demanding real-time fMRI neurofeedback task that targeted down-regulation of the primary auditory cortex. Each of twelve healthy subjects performed 16 block-design fMRI runs (4 runs per day repeated on 4 days) resulting 192 runs in total. The analysis included data-driven independent component analysis (ICA) and high-resolution latency estimation between the four components that corresponded to subnetworks of the DM network. These different subnetworks reemerged after regulation with an average time lag or 3.3 s and a time lag of 4.4 s between the first and fourth components; i.e., the DM recovery first shifts from anterior to posterior, and then gradually focuses on the ventral part of the posterior cingulate cortex, which is known to be implicated in internally directed cognition. In addition, we found less reactivation in the early anterior subnetwork as regulation strength increased, but more reactivation with larger regulation for the late subnetwork that encompassed the ventral PCC. This finding confirms that the level of task engagement influences inversely the subsequent recovery of regions related to attention compared to those related to internally directed cognition. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Elsevier2012

Distributed Patterns of Brain Activity Underlying Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Kirsten Emmert, Sven Haller, Rotem Roza Kopel, Frank Scharnowski, Dimitri Nestor Alice Van De Ville

Neurofeedback (NF) based on real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rt-fMRI) is an exciting neuroimaging application. In most rt-fMRI NF studies, the activity level of a single region of interest (ROI) is provided as a feedback signal and the participants are trained to up or down regulate the feedback signal. NF training effects are typically analyzed using a confirmatory univariate approach, i.e., changes in the target ROI are explained by a univariate linear modulation. However, learning to self-regulate the ROI activity through NF is mediated by distributed changes across the brain. Here, we deploy a multivariate decoding model for assessing NF training effects across the whole brain. Specifically, we first explain the NF training effect by a posthoc multivariate model that leads to a pattern of coactivation based on 90 functional atlas regions. We then use cross validation to reveal the set of brain regions with the best fit. This novel approach was applied to the data from a rt-fMRI NF study where the participants learned to down regulate the auditory cortex. We found that the optimal model consisted of 16 brain regions whose coactivation patterns best described the training effect over the NF training days. Cross validation of the multivariate model showed that it generalized across the participants. Interestingly, the participants could be clustered into two groups with distinct patterns of coactivation, potentially reflecting different NF learning strategies. Overall, our findings revealed that multiple brain regions are involved in learning to regulate an activity in a single ROI, and thus leading to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying NF training.

Ieee-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc2017

Data-driven tensor independent component analysis for model-based connectivity neurofeedback

Yury Koush, Nemanja Masala, Frank Scharnowski, Dimitri Nestor Alice Van De Ville

Neurofeedback based on real-time functional MRI is an emerging technique to train voluntary control over brain activity in healthy and disease states. Recent developments even allow for training of brain networks using connectivity feedback based on dynamic causal modeling (DCM). DCM is an influential hypothesis-driven approach that requires prior knowledge about the target brain network dynamics and the modulatory influences. Data-driven approaches, such as tensor independent component analysis (ICA), can reveal spatiotemporal patterns of brain activity without prior assumptions. Tensor ICA allows flexible data decomposition and extraction of components consisting of spatial maps, time-series, and session/subject-specific weights, which can be used to characterize individual neurofeedback regulation per regulation trial, run, or session. In this study, we aimed to better understand the spatiotemporal brain patterns involved and affected by model-based feedback regulation using data-driven tensor ICA. We found that task-specific spatiotemporal brain patterns obtained using tensor ICA were highly consistent with model-based feedback estimates. However, we found that the DCM approach captured specific network interdependencies that went beyond what could be detected with either general linear model (GLM) or ICA approaches. We also found that neurofeedback-guided regulation resulted in activity changes that were characteristic of the mental strategies used to control the feedback signal, and that these activity changes were not limited to periods of active self-regulation, but were also evident in distinct gradual recovery processes during subsequent rest periods. Complementary data-driven and model-based approaches could aid in interpretation of the neurofeedback data when applied post-hoc, and in the definition of the target brain area/pattern/network/model prior to the neurofeedback training study when applied to the pilot data. Systematically investigating the triad of mental effort, spatiotemporal brain network changes, and activity and recovery processes might lead to a better understanding of how learning with neurofeedback is accomplished, and how such learning can cause plastic brain changes along with specific behavioral effects.