Modeling of transcription mechanisms in mammals from kinetic measurements in single cells

Benjamin Zoller
EPFL, 2014
EPFL thesis

Abstract

In mammals, transcription was observed to occur predominantly in bursts, resulting from short and intense periods of gene transcription interspersed by longer silent periods. In order to elucidate the causes and the consequences of discontinuous transcription in mammals, we further extended a probabilistic and computational framework to model single-cell time-lapse recording of luminescent reporter based on stochastic gene expression models that describe the basic processes of gene activation, transcription, translation, and degradation of mRNA and proteins. Motivated by the recent finding of a refractory period in gene reactivation, we performed inference in promoter cycle models, where the gene activity is modeled by one active state and multiple sequential inactive states describing the promoter progression toward activation, and we characterized the rate limiting processes causing the refractory period. Our analysis demonstrated that the kinetic structure of the cycle is gene-specific. Several rate limiting steps (5 on average) are required to model the silent period of endogenous promoters while minimal synthetic promoters overall exhibit a simplified promoter cycle structure characterized by a reduced number of steps (3 on average) and longer silent period. Nevertheless, the promoter architecture might not solely be responsible for such an observed difference, as the synthetic promoters were all sharing similar chromatin context (same insertion locus). Based on the inferred kinetics, we investigate the implications on the transcriptional noise. It followed from the inferred bursting kinetics, that intrinsic noise is dominated by the fluctuations in the cycle, and globally maintained over the wide range of expression covered by the clones (100-fold). With minor modifications of the developed probabilistic framework, we investigated how the bursting kinetics of a mammalian gene (Ctgf) are modulated in response to two different induction pathways. Both stimuli resulted in a fast and acute increase in burst sizes. Whereas TGF-b1 induced a sustained increase of transcription rate and prolonged transcriptional activation, serum stimulation led to a large and temporally tight first transcriptional burst, followed by a refractory period in the range of hours. Those observations illustrated how different stimuli can result in kinetically distinct transcriptional responses of the same gene.

Official source

https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/203610?ln=en

About this result

This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.

Related concepts

Related publications

Benjamin Zoller
EPFL, 2014
EPFL thesis

Abstract

Official source

https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/203610?ln=en

About this result

Related concepts (21)

Related concepts

Related publications (109)

Related publications

Studies on KRAB/KAP1-Mediated Transcriptional Repression

Anna Claire Groner

The sequencing of the human genome revealed that the C2H2-zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) are the largest family of human transcription factors. Around 300 members of this family contain, in addition to their zinc finger motifs, a KRAB domain that has been implicated in transcriptional repression. It is thought that KRAB-ZFPs mediate this effect through the recruitment of the corepressor KAP1, which induces facultative heterochromatin through the activity of several associated chromatin-modifying factors. Our studies focused on the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of transcriptional repression induced by KRAB-ZFPs and KAP1. For this, we made use of the conditional binding activity of the KRAB-containing repressor tTRKRAB. This ectopic protein serves as a paradigm for endogenous KRAB-ZFP functions, as it depends on cellular KAP1 for transcriptional repression. tTRKRAB only binds to heterologous TetO sites in the absence of doxycycline, thus making repressor activity drug-regulated. When we targeted the repressor to euchromatic sites modified with TetO, we found that it induced increased levels of H3K9me3 and HP1β at the genes it bound to. We also monitored the effect of repressor binding on transcription by assessing the activity of TetO-containing reporter genes that were driven by endogenous promoters and that were initially used to create euchromatic tTRKRAB binding sites. This analysis revealed that KRAB/KAP1 mediated long-range heterochromatin spreading, which only resulted in transcriptional repression if repressive marks reached the promoter and impaired transcriptional initiation. The efficiency of this process was highest in an environment of very strong gene activity, as indicated by the levels of active histone modifications. We found that KRAB-ZFP genes themselves are probably targets of KRAB/KAP1-mediated repression and elucidated their transcriptional regulation and chromatin structure. KAP1 was localized to the promoter and to the 3' end of KRAB-ZFP genes, suggesting self-regulatory loops. However, only KAP1 localized to the 3' end of KRAB-ZFP genes mediated increased levels of H3K9me3 and HP1β along the gene body, without affecting the promoter. Therefore, KAP1 is involved in controlling the spread of heterochromatin at these endogenous sites, largely without regulating transcription. The function of this heterochromatic chromatin landscape may lie in the protection from chromosomal rearrangements between highly homologous KRAB-ZFP genes. Despite this repressive structure, KRAB-ZFP genes are still expressed, as high levels of transcription-associated H3K36me3 accompany H3K9me3 throughout the gene bodies. Other projects described in this thesis include the elucidation of the role of KAP1 in behavior and the assessment of KRAB/KAP1-mediated repression in the context of episomal structures. Both of these areas are of scientific and biomedical interest and address basic principles of the molecular mechanisms of KRAB/KAP1-mediated transcriptional repression.

EPFL2011

Every morning the sun rises, flooding the earth with its light and heat and every night it disappears leaving the Earth in the darkness of the night. Organisms living on this planet have adapted to this solar rhythm and have spread their activities throughout the day. Early in the development of life, an internal molecular clock appeared in primitive organisms and the evolutionary advantage of being able to anticipate, rather than simply passively face, environmental changes led virtually all organisms to have an internal timing system called "circadian clock." In most species, this clock is constituted of a genetic network ticking in every cell of the body. This genetic network organized in interlocked feedback loops generates oscillations with a 24-hour period. A variable number of proteins and RNAs is thus accumulating in a rhythmic fashion. For example, in mouse liver, which was the main biological model I used during my thesis, it is estimated that thousands of genes are expressed periodically. The molecular processes leading to rhythmic gene expression and protein accumulation are highly regulated. Dynamical control is needed to sustain the oscillations and to maintain their timing. During my PhD, I was particularly interested in the regulation of rhythmic gene activation via transcription factor binding in their promoter region. I also focused on gene transcription itself and its dynamics as well as on transcription associated changes in epigenetic marks. Another interest was given to the regulation of transcripts (messenger RNA) after transcription, especially to understand whether their degradation in the cytoplasm was regulated rhythmically. Finally, I contributed to a project aiming at the detection of transcripts whose translation into protein was specifically regulated in a circadian manner. The four projects on which I worked were done in collaborations with experimental biology labs. Our partners performed the experiments and provided the biological material while I was in charge of the data processing and their statistical analysis. For some projects, I also developed different mathematical models for a more accurate and complete understanding of the phenomena studied and to take into account the inherent variability of biological data. Notably in the project on the post-transcriptional regulation of transcripts, the model-based approach we developed allowed estimating the role of this regulation in a way that is less prone to arbitrary choice of criteria or thresholds compared to previous studies addressing this question. To summarize, the results I obtained show that, in human cell lines, the major transcription factor of the clock (the heterodimer CLOCK/BMAL1) binds to DNA at specific binding sites and their number is comparable to the number of binding sites observed in the mouse liver. However the fraction of rhythmic transcript among the genes with CLOCK/BMAL1 binding sites is about 10 times lower than the corresponding fraction observed in mouse liver. The results of the second project showed that, in mouse liver, rhythmic transcription is followed by dynamical changes in epigenetic marks with delays specific to the marks (tri-methylation of lysines 4 and 36 of histone 3 of nucleosomes) and we highlighted the role of post-transcriptional regulation for the rhythmic expression of a subset of mRNAs. In the third project, we further investigated the regulation at the post-transcriptional level and combining measurements of pre-mRNA and mRNA with a mathematical model, we showed that the post-transcriptional regulation plays a limited role in the rhythmic accumulation of transcripts and is involved in the regulation of only 20 % of rhythmic transcripts. Laboratories of Michael Brunner (University of Heidelberg, Germany), Frederic Gachon, Nouria Hernandez (University of Lausanne, Switzerland) and Ueli Schibler (University of Geneva, Switzerland) 3 Finally, helped by the analysis I performed on micro array data from an experiment aiming at comparing the fraction of translated mRNA to the total accumulation of these mRNAs, the team of Frederic Gachon showed that several transcripts implied in the composition of ribosomes are translated specifically during the night, when rodents are active. All of these results and their links with other published studies on circadian rhythms, show that biological tissues have largely incorporated the clock for the regulation of many other functional pathways in order to optimally synchronize their physiological actions with environmental changes due to the alternation of days and nights. In mouse liver, links with the metabolism are particularly strong and disruptions of the clock induce phenotypes reflecting a disturbed metabolism.

EPFL2013

Rhythmic and clock-dependent chromatin loops regulate circadian gene expression

Jérôme Mermet

In mammals the circadian clock drives daily behavioural and physiological changes that resonate with environmental cues, which can be observed, for example, in the intricate timing of rest during the night and activity during the day in humans. The circadian clock consists of a network of hierarchical clocks in which the central pacemaker is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, which is sensitive to external light and propagates time to the peripheral organ-based clocks. Within organs, clocks tick in each individual cell and are molecularly encoded in the genome as a network of dynamic feedback loops. By mediating the expression of the appropriate gene products at the correct moment of the day, the molecular clocks op-timize physiological functions of virtually every cell in our body, allowing us to synchronize with daily fluc-tuations in the environment. In mammalian cells the chromatin organization in the nucleus consists of a topological network, in which chromatin interactions between distal regulatory elements such as enhancers and target genes are essen-tial to regulate gene expression. Important questions remain: is the complex chromatin folding dynamic and if so on which genomic and temporal scales? In fact, dynamic rearrangements of the chromatin have been reported on multiple genomic and time scales, from the entire genome to enhancer-promoter con-tacts, across developmental transitions, cellular differentiation, and transcription cycles. With this per-spective in mind, the circadian oscillator provides a unique model to study the dynamics of genomic inter-actions in the context of fluctuating transcription. Here, we explored chromatin contacts of core-clock and clock-controlled gene promoters in the mouse. We aimed at evaluating the putative dynamics of chromatin contacts, at estimating their conservation across tissues, and at exploring the contribution of the circadian clock to this interaction network. To achieve this goal, we performed 4C-sequencing assays at two circadian time points in the liver and kidney of WT and clock-deficient animals. Overall, we observe that chromatin contacts are largely conserved across circadian time points and genetic backgrounds, and are tissue-specific. Our experiments reveal that the promoters of core-clock and clock-controlled genes contact distal genomic regions containing en-hancer chromatin signatures, suggesting a functional role of these distal sites in target gene regulation. Our data also suggest a clock-driven module of rhythmic genes that are colocalized in the nucleus. However, we also observe dynamic contacts between oscillating gene promoter and enhancer-like ge-nomic regions. In this thesis, we discuss in detail two examples of dynamic chromatin looping that are ob-served at the Cry1 and Gys2 loci. Our data reveal not only a dynamic coupling between the chromatin loop and the transcriptional state but also that the dynamic of chromatin looping depends on a functional clock. Furthermore, genome editing experiments using CRISPR-Cas9 tools reveal that the Cry1 distal site is essential for the transcriptional regulation of Cry1 and contributes to the circadian clock robustness both in-vivo and in cultured cells. These results demonstrate how local chromatin rearrangements take place in a 24-hour time-scale and set chromatin looping between gene promoters and distal regions as a new reg-ulatory layer for circadian gene expression.

EPFL2017