Super-fine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) for efficient removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent

In an effort to mitigate the discharge of micropollutants to surface waters, adsorption of micropollutants onto powdered activated carbon (PAC) after conventional wastewater treatment has been identified as a promising technology for enhanced removal of pharmaceuticals and pesticides from wastewater. We investigated the effectiveness of super-fine powdered activated carbon, SPAC, (ca. 1 µm mean particle diameter) in comparison to regular-sized PAC (17-37 µm mean diameter) for the optimization of micropollutant removal from wastewater. Adsorption isotherms and batch kinetic experiments were performed for 10 representative micropollutants (bezafibrate, benzotriazole, carbamazepine, diclofenac, gabapentin mecoprop, metoprolol, ofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim) onto three commercial PACs and their super-fine variants in carbonate buffer and in wastewater effluent. SPAC showed substantially faster adsorption kinetics of all micropollutants than conventional PAC, regardless of the micropollutant adsorption affinity and the solution matrix. The total adsorptive capacities of SPAC were similar to those of PAC for two of the three tested carbon materials, in all tested waters. However, in effluent wastewater, the presence of effluent organic matter adversely affected micropollutant removal, resulting in lower removal efficiencies especially for micropollutants with low affinity for adsorbent particles in comparison to pure water. In comparison to PAC, SPAC application resulted in up to two-fold enhanced dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal from effluent wastewater. The more efficient adsorption process using SPAC translates into a reduction of contact time and contact tank size as well as reduced carbon dosing for a targeted micropollutant removal. In the tested effluent wastewater (5 mg/L DOC), the necessary dose to achieve 80% average removal of indicator micropollutants (benzotriazole, diclofenac, carbamazepine, mecoprop and sulfamethoxazole) ranged between 13-15 mg/L. These promising results warrant pilot-scale tests using super-fine PAC as an alternative to PAC for more efficient micropollutant removal.

Elimination of micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants : Ozonation or activated carbon? Conclusions of a one-year pilot project

David Andrew Barry, Luiz Felippe De Alencastro, Anoys Magnet, Jonas Margot, Luca Rossi

Many organic micropollutants present in wastewater, such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides, are poorly removed in conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). To reduce the release of these substances into the aquatic environment, advanced treatments are necessary and may be soon mandatory in Switzerland. Two advanced treatments were tested in pilot systems over more than one year at the municipal WWTP of Lausanne, Switzerland. The first pilot involves the ozonation of the effluent to oxidize organic substances. It is followed by a sand filtration (SF) to remove the readily biodegradable reaction products. The second pilot consists of a powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition into the effluent to sorb micropollutants. It is followed either by a membrane filtration (ultrafiltration) or a sand filtration to separate the PAC from the treated water. A selection of 58 potentially problematic substances (pharmaceuticals, pesticides, endocrine disruptors) were regularly measured at different stages of treatment by ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled to a tandem mass spectrometer, and a large battery of ecotoxicological tests (16 in vitro and 9 in vivo assays with different organisms) were performed to evaluate the toxicity of the effluents. The results showed that most compounds were removed over 80% with an average ozone dose of about 5.5 mgO3/l or a PAC dose between 10 and 20 mg/l. Only some single compounds, such as X-ray contrast media, were only partially eliminated in both cases. A clear reduction in toxicity was also observed after the two treatments in most of the cases. These two processes (ozonation and PAC addition) are therefore effective to reduce the release of micropollutants into surface waters. Ozonation-SF and PAC-SF proved to be feasible in terms of implementation and operation at large-scale in WWTP, for relatively similar investment and operation costs (about 0.1 to 0.15 € per m3 treated based on local costs). Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore the method selection should be made case by case for each WWTP depending on the local constraints (e.g. space, security, energy costs, existing treatment processes, sludge disposal process, need for disinfection, etc.), the quality and the quantity of incoming water and the desired output water quality.

2011

Elimination of micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants: Ozonation or activated carbon? Conclusions of a one-year pilot project

David Andrew Barry, Nathalie Chèvre Rossi, Luiz Felippe De Alencastro, Anoys Magnet, Jonas Margot, Luca Rossi

Many organic micropollutants present in wastewater, such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides, are poorly removed in conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). To reduce the release of these substances into the aquatic environment, advanced treatments are necessary. Two advanced treatments were tested in pilot systems over more than one year at the municipal WWTP of Lausanne, Switzerland. The first pilot involves the ozonation of the effluent to oxidize organic substances. It is followed by sand filtration (SF) to remove the readily biodegradable reaction products. The second pilot consists of a powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition into the effluent to sorb micropollutants. It is followed either by a membrane filtration (ultrafiltration) or a sand filtration to separate the PAC from the treated water. A selection of 58 potentially problematic substances (pharmaceuticals, pesticides, endocrine disruptors) were regularly measured at different stages of treatment by ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled to a tandem mass spectrometer, and a large battery of ecotoxicological tests (16 in vitro and 9 in vivo assays with different organisms) were performed to evaluate the toxicity of the effluents. The results showed that most compounds were removed over 80% with an average ozone dose of about 5.5 mgO3/l or a PAC dose between 10 and 20 mg/l. Only some single compounds, such as X-ray contrast media, were only partially eliminated in both cases. A clear reduction in toxicity was also observed after the two treatments in most of the cases. These two processes (ozonation and PAC addition) are therefore effective to reduce the release of micropollutants into surface waters. Ozonation-SF and PAC-SF proved to be feasible in terms of implementation and operation at large-scale in WWTP, for relatively similar investment and operation costs (about 0.1 to 0.15 € per m3 treated based on local costs). Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore the method selection should be made case by case for each WWTP depending on the local constraints (e.g. space, security, energy costs, existing treatment processes, sludge disposal process, need for disinfection, etc.), the quality and the quantity of incoming water and the desired output water quality

2011

Conception of a biological activated carbon filter for micropollutants removal in wastewater

Solène Gomez

The presence of micro pollutants in water is an important emerging problem because of their negative impacts on health and environment. The Swiss Federal Office of the Environment is planning to impose new regulations to reduce the load of micro pollutants in waste water. This paper assesses the use of biological activated carbon (BAC) to treat micro pollutants from small waste water treatment plant (WWTP). In a first part, articles were consulted to evaluate the state of the art of BAC filters: their properties, efficiencies, costs as well as the impact of parameters such as the empty bed contact time (EBCT), aeration and backwashing. In a second part, two BAC filters were designed for implementation in WWTP (Vidy, Lausanne, Switzerland) and laboratory. The dimensioned BAC filter for the WWTP has an EBCT of 90 min and treats 1.7 L day-1. The proposed carbon is the ‘DCL-G’ carbon type. Feed water is pumped from the aeration tank of the Vidy WWTP and rejected before the existing granular activated carbon filter. Backwashing consists in stirring the top layer of carbon bed weekly and no aeration is needed for the proposed implementation. Dissolved organic carbon and micro pollutants monitoring is planned. The BAC filters are expected to remove 90% of micro pollutants treated below a concentration of 10 ng L-1.

2013

Elimination of micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants : Ozonation or activated carbon? Conclusions of a one-year pilot project

David Andrew Barry, Luiz Felippe De Alencastro, Anoys Magnet, Jonas Margot, Luca Rossi

2011

Elimination of micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants: Ozonation or activated carbon? Conclusions of a one-year pilot project

David Andrew Barry, Nathalie Chèvre Rossi, Luiz Felippe De Alencastro, Anoys Magnet, Jonas Margot, Luca Rossi

Many organic micropollutants present in wastewater, such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides, are poorly removed in conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). To reduce the release of these substances into the aquatic environment, advanced treatments are necessary. Two advanced treatments were tested in pilot systems over more than one year at the municipal WWTP of Lausanne, Switzerland. The first pilot involves the ozonation of the effluent to oxidize organic substances. It is followed by sand filtration (SF) to remove the readily biodegradable reaction products. The second pilot consists of a powdered activated carbon (PAC) addition into the effluent to sorb micropollutants. It is followed either by a membrane filtration (ultrafiltration) or a sand filtration to separate the PAC from the treated water. A selection of 58 potentially problematic substances (pharmaceuticals, pesticides, endocrine disruptors) were regularly measured at different stages of treatment by ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled to a tandem mass spectrometer, and a large battery of ecotoxicological tests (16 in vitro and 9 in vivo assays with different organisms) were performed to evaluate the toxicity of the effluents. The results showed that most compounds were removed over 80% with an average ozone dose of about 5.5 mgO3/l or a PAC dose between 10 and 20 mg/l. Only some single compounds, such as X-ray contrast media, were only partially eliminated in both cases. A clear reduction in toxicity was also observed after the two treatments in most of the cases. These two processes (ozonation and PAC addition) are therefore effective to reduce the release of micropollutants into surface waters. Ozonation-SF and PAC-SF proved to be feasible in terms of implementation and operation at large-scale in WWTP, for relatively similar investment and operation costs (about 0.1 to 0.15 € per m3 treated based on local costs). Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore the method selection should be made case by case for each WWTP depending on the local constraints (e.g. space, security, energy costs, existing treatment processes, sludge disposal process, need for disinfection, etc.), the quality and the quantity of incoming water and the desired output water quality

2011