EEG Correlates of Relative Motion Encoding

A large portion of the visual cortex is organized retinotopically, but perception is usually non-retinotopic. For example, a reflector on the spoke of a bicycle wheel appears to move on a circular or prolate cycloidal orbit as the bicycle moves forward, while in fact it traces out a curtate cycloidal trajectory. The moving bicycle serves as a non-retinotopic reference system to which the motion of the reflector is anchored. To study the neural correlates of non-retinotopic motion processing, we used the Ternus-Pikler display, where retinotopic processing in a stationary reference system is contrasted against non-retinotopic processing in a moving one. Using high-density EEG, we found similar brain responses for both retinotopic and non-retinotopic rotational apparent motion from the earliest evoked peak (around 120 ms) and throughout the rest of the visual processing, but only minor correlates of the motion of the reference system itself (mainly around 100-120 ms). We suggest that the visual system efficiently discounts the motion of the reference system from early on, allowing a largely reference system independent encoding of the motion of object parts.

Neural correlates of non-retinotopic visual processing and light adaptation

Yvonne Evelina Thunell

In the main part of this thesis, I investigate the neural correlates of nonretinotopic processing. We might intuitively think of the visual representation of the world as retinotopic, as is the case for the organization of most visual brain areas, but in fact our perception is usually not retinotopic. Consider for example a bicycle passing by with a reflector on one of its wheels. The reflector appears to move in a circular or prolate cycloidal orbit. It’s true motion trajectory, however, is a curtate cycloid. It seems that we perceive the reflector motion relative to the bicycle. The bicycle thus serves as a moving reference system for computing the motion of its constituent parts. Only little is known about the neural correlates of this type of non-retinotopic processing. Here, using EEG, I investigate the temporal dynamics of the encoding of non-retinotopic motion relative to a moving reference system. The results indicate that the motion of the reference system is discounted from the motion of the part already from 120 ms after stimulus onset and that the non-retinotopic representation dominates throughout the rest of the visual processing. Further, I use fMRI to show that the earliest area in the visual hierarchy holding non-retinotopic representations is the human motion processing complex (hMT+). In the second part of the thesis, the EEG correlates of light adaptation are investigated. Light adaptation is crucial for coping with the large range of ambient luminance values in our environment. We first confirm the known adaptation effect; the overall response to light flashes decreases substantially after adaption to bright light as compared to dim light. Furthermore, this adaptation effect depends on the wavelength of the light, being most pronounced for red light as compared to white, green and blue light. In addition, at short latencies (less than 100 ms) responses to light flashes are stronger after bright than after dim light adaptation for all colors except red. Our results show that even very short-latency EEG responses are differentially affected by different wavelengths of light.

EPFL2014

A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing

Marco Boi, Michael Herzog, Thomas Otto

In human vision, the optics of the eye map neighboring points of the environment onto neighboring photoreceptors in the retina. This retinotopic encoding principle is preserved in the early visual areas. Under normal viewing conditions, due to the motion of objects and to eye movements, the retinotopic representation of the environment undergoes fast and drastic shifts. Yet, perceptually our environment appears stable suggesting the existence of non-retinotopic representations in addition to the well-known retinotopic ones. Here, we present a simple psychophysical test to determine whether a given visual process is accomplished in retino- or non-retinotopic coordinates. As examples, we show that visual search and motion perception can occur within a non-retinotopic frame of reference. These findings suggest that more mechanisms than previously thought operate non-retinotopically. Whether this is true for a given visual process can easily be found out with our "litmus test."

Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology2009

Functional specialization and dynamic resource allocation in visual cortex

Gijs Plomp

We studied the spatiotemporal characteristics of cortical activity in early visual areas and the fusiform gyri (FG) by means of magnetoencephalography (MEG). Subjects performed a visual classification task, in which letters and visually similar pseudoletters were presented in different surrounds and under different task demands. The stimuli appeared in a cued half of the visual field (VF). We observed prestimulus effects on amplitudes in V1 and Cuneus relating to VF and task demands, suggesting a combination of active anticipation and specialized routing of activity in visual processing. Amplitudes in the right FG between 150 and 350 ms after stimulus onset reflected task demands, while those in the left FG between 300 and 400 ms showed selectivity for graphemes. The contrasting stimulus-evoked effects in the right and left FG show that the former area is sensitive to task demands irrespective of stimulus content, whereas the left FG is sensitive to stimulus content irrespectively of task demand.

Wiley-Blackwell2010

Neural correlates of non-retinotopic visual processing and light adaptation

Yvonne Evelina Thunell

EPFL2014