Influence of Rotational Nucleosome Positioning on Transcription Start Site Selection in Animal Promoters

The recruitment of RNA-Pol-II to the transcription start site (TSS) is an important step in gene regulation in all organisms. Core promoter elements (CPE) are conserved sequence motifs that guide Pol-II to the TSS by interacting with specific transcription factors (TFs). However, only a minority of animal promoters contains CPEs. It is still unknown how Pol-II selects the TSS in their absence. Here we present a comparative analysis of promoters’ sequence composition and chromatin architecture in five eukaryotic model organisms, which shows the presence of common and unique DNA-encoded features used to organize chromatin. Analysis of Pol-II initiation patterns uncovers that, in the absence of certain CPEs, there is a strong correlation between the spread of initiation and the intensity of the 10 bp periodic signal in the nearest downstream nucleosome. Moreover, promoters’ primary and secondary initiation sites show a characteristic 10 bp periodicity in the absence of CPEs. We also show that DNA natural variants in the region immediately downstream the TSS are able to affect both the nucleosome-DNA affinity and Pol-II initiation pattern. These findings support the notion that, in addition to CPEs mediated selection, sequence–induced nucleosome positioning could be a common and conserved mechanism of TSS selection in animals

Phase specific transcriptional regulation of circadian clock and metabolism in mouse liver

Jonathan Aryeh Sobel

The molecular clock has been conserved from cyanobacteria to mammals and is believed to align behavioral and biochemical processes with the diurnal cycle. This cellular mechanism has been an advantage to increase the fitness of organisms through the ability to anticipate food availability or predator presence. Accumulating evidence has revealed that the circadian clock is intimately interconnected with the metabolic cycle. But, the nature of these interconnections is yet not clear at the transcriptional level, and the contribution of cis-regulatory modules has not been elucidated. Accessible chromatin regions of the genome are implicated in diverse processes, such as gene regulation through enhancers and promoters, insulation of genomic domains or alternative splicing. They allow cell-type specific programs that are controlled by tissue-specific transcription factors and chromatin modifiers, although tissue-specific regulation of the circadian clock remains unclear. Therefore, we compared genome-wide BMAL1 binding and chromatin accessibility in the liver and in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Moreover, for the first time, our study explores the dynamics of accessible regions, histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac) and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) every 4 hours over one day in mouse liver. In this study, we show that a substantial fraction of these accessible sites are oscillating during a diurnal cycle with a circadian period. We observed that these accessible regions are enriched in the proximity of actively transcribed genes, and that they are dynamically affected by the binding of transcription factors such as BMAL1. We investigated wild-type (WT) and Bmal1-/- genotypes, in night restricted feeding regimen and in Light-Dark (LD) cycle, to study the circadian clock regulatory network underlying diurnal transcription. Therefore, we applied a penalized generalized linear model to infer the activity of transcription factor binding motifs in oscillating accessible sites using Pol II loadings at the transcription start sites of nearby genes. We were able to recapitulate the known regulatory elements of the circadian clock, notably E-box, D-Box, and ROR-responsive elements (RRE) in the WT genotype. On the other hand, we found that Forkhead box (FOX), glucocorticoids responsive elements (GRE), and C-AMP Response Element (CRE) were the main contributors of the regulation of oscillating genes in Bmal1-/-. Finally, using a mixture model to detect footprints with a base pair resolution, we studied the dynamics of the accessibility overlapping E-box. Our last analysis suggested that BMAL1/CLOCK is binding on double E-boxes with a spacer of 6 or 7 bp in a hetero-tetramer configuration. A 3D structure model further supported this binding mode. In Summary, we used DNase I-seq and ChIP-seq of Pol II and H3K27ac to study the circadian chromatin landscape in a 4h time-resolved experimental design. We uncovered the underlying circadian transcriptional regulatory network and, we dissected the chromatin accessibility around BMAL1 binding sites at a base pair resolution, which led to an unappreciated mode of binding of BMAL1/CLOCK in a hetero-tetramer conformation on double E-boxes. Lastly, we found tissue-specific factors that might contribute to tissue-specific binding of BMAL1/CLOCK.

EPFL2016

Genomic targets and molecular partners of the chromatin regulator KAP1

Annamaria Kauzlaric

KAP1 is an enigmatic regulatory protein, first described some twenty years ago, shown to be involved in multiple and diverse cellular functions. Specifically, it mediates tasks critical to cell growth and differentiation, pluripotency, apoptosis, gene silencing, DNA repair and genomic integrity maintenance. In line with these findings, Kap1 deletion results in embryonic lethality, and its conditional ablation impairs crucial processes such as erythropoiesis, hepatic metabolism homeostasis and stress response. Initially named also TIF1ðœ, transcriptional intermediary factor 1ðœ, KAP1 was thought to mediate mostly chromatin-related functions. Accordingly, global maps of genomic recruitment of KAP1, generated with the advent of high-throughput technologies, display binding of this protein to thousands of loci in a multiplicity of cell types. Coupling such maps with data of transcriptional perturbations detected upon Kap1 depletion, and with the protein complexes associated with KAP1, proved to be a highly efficient approach to elucidate the molecular functions of KAP1. In particular, such studies unveiled the mechanisms of KAP1-mediated repression of different classes of transposable elements (TEs), and led to important evolutionary considerations on the strategies evolved by higher organisms to restrict the activity of these entities. Through its multiple functional domains, KAP1 interacts with a broad range of proteins, and our first goal was to establish the complete set of such potential cofactors. We found marked enrichment of KAP1 in the chromatin fraction of the nucleus, and accordingly, among its associated proteins, a strong preponderance of nucleic-acid contacting proteins. We revealed that KAP1 is part of a variety of relatively low molecular weight complexes, co-existing at comparable abundances. Study of the molecular functions of the hits suggested that KAP1 could partake in processes thus far unexplored in this context, such as DNA replication and active transcription. We then pursued with the thorough characterization of genome-wide KAP1 binding sites, and found significant fractions of RNA polymerase II (PolII)-dependent promoters and RNA polymerase III (PolIII)-transcribed elements, for the majority enriched with euchromatic marks, to be targeted by KAP1. Using high-throughput techniques, we uncovered that KAP1 variably affected the PolII pausing index of defined sets of genes, and downregulated transcription of tRNA genes. Our analyses of KAP1 genomic recruitments further led us to the discovery of novel genetic entities in the mouse genome, highly related to KRAB zinc finger protein (KZFP) genes. We described possible mechanisms underlying the evolution and amplification of these sequences and more broadly of the KZFP genes family. Furthermore, our data supported the existence of a KAP1-dependent regulatory circuit taming TE-contained enhancers located in the vicinity of these genetic units, thereby regulating their expression. We explored the proposed models of KAP1 functions in euchromatic regions of the genome, and with our results we provided the most complete analysis of the interactome of KAP1 thus far reported. Moreover, we annotated new potentially protein-coding transcripts belonging to the biggest single family of transcription factors encoded in the murine and human genomes. In sum, this work brings novel pieces of information that complement the current knowledge in the field, opening the way to further molecular studies clarifying the physiological roles of KAP1 in higher vertebrates.

EPFL2017

Computational study of transcription factor binding sites

Romain Fernand Pietro Groux

Any living organism contains a whole set of instructions encoded as genes on the DNA. This set of instructions contains all the necessary information that the organism will ever need, from its development to a mature individual to environment specific responses. Since all these instructions are not needed at the same time, the gene expression needs to be regulated. Eukaryotic genomes are stored inside nuclei as chromatin. The chromatin is the association of DNA with dedicated storage proteins - the histones - and the necessary machinery to regulate and express genes (RNA polymerases or RNAPs). In the nuclei, histones are assembled into octamers around which are wrapped ~148bp of DNA. This structure is known as the nucleosome. The repetition of nucleosomes along the genome allows to drastically compact the genome, eventually allowing to fit it inside the nucleus. However, this comes at the cost of rendering the DNA sequence inaccessible to DNA readers, such as the RNAPs and transcription factors (TFs). TFs are a class of proteins that have the remarkable property of recognizing and binding specific DNA sequences. More striking, each TF can recognize a multitude of different - but similar - DNA sequences providing TFs with a wide sequence specificity range. Eventually, this allows the cell to recruit TFs at dedicated locations in the genome called regulatory elements (REs). The action of TFs at REs is crucial to gene expression. Indeed, TFs are involved in many processes such as the opening of the chromatin structure or the recruitment of RNAPs. However if TFs can influence the chromatin structure, the opposite is also true as histones impede TF binding on DNA. Thus the regulation of genes relies on a subtle and complex crosstalk between the chromatin and TFs. To better understand how TFs and chromatin interact together to regulate gene expression, I lead several projects prospecting TF binding specificity and the chromatin structure at REs in human. First, I used ENCODE next generation sequencing (NGS) data to explore how TF binding influences the nearby nucleosome organization and the propensity of some TFs to bind together. The results suggest that regular nucleosome arrays are found near all TFs. They also point out two special cases. When CTCF binds with the cohesin complex, it seems to drive the nucleosome organization, which is a unique feature among all TFs investigated. Additionally I present evidence supporting that EBF1 is a pioneer factor - a special class of TFs able to bind nucleosome. Secondly, I developed several clustering algorithms and software to partition genomic regions according to NGS data and/or on their DNA sequences. These methods allow to discover important trends, for instance different nucleosome architectures . I illustrated the usefulness of these methods for the study of chromatin accessibility data and the identification of REs. Thirdly, I participated to the assessment of SMiLE-seq, a new microfluidic device that generates TF specificity data. The creation of TF specificity models and their comparison with other publicly available models demonstrated the value of SMiLE-seq to study TF specificity. Finally, I participated in the development of a software that predicts TF binding sites. A careful benchmarking suggested that this software is - at the time of writing - the best available software in terms of speed while showing other performances similar to its competitors.

EPFL2020