In vivo neurochemistry of the ventral striatum and social competition in Homo sapiens

Ventral striatal function and trait anxiety have been shown to influence reward-seeking behaviour and social competition in humans. Moreover, social status perceptions have been shown to modulate ventral striatal function. The neurochemical underpinnings of these associations have not been investigated in humans so far. Studies in rodents have previously shown that ventral striatal neurochemistry is associated with these concepts. In humans, objective and perceived social hierarchy position show some links to physical and mental health. Trait anxiety is understood as a predisposing factor underlying neuropsychiatric disorders and is associated with social anxiety. Fear and avoidance of social interactions, both inherent to environmental contexts of direct social competition, are hallmarks of social anxiety. Lost economic productivity due to anxiety and social status associated decrements in physical and mental health renders this scientific topic of high relevance to public health policies. Moving towards a deeper understanding of these associations might constitute an important part in ensuring public health. We combine proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy with personality profiling and an incentivised handgrip motivation task in a socially competitive context to investigate the neurochemical underpinnings of these associations in young adult men. We chose the occipital lobe as a control region. In addition, we have measured the salivary biomarkers cortisol, testosterone and alpha-amylase. We found that trait anxiety is negatively linked to taurine and positively to the excitation-inhibition balance. State anxiety was positively linked to lactate. The salivary biomarker alpha-amylase was found to be associated with both state anxiety and lactate. Social anxiety was positively linked to the excitation-inhibition balance. We also show links between reward-seeking task performance and ventral striatal glutamine, phosphorylethanolamine, GABA, choline, glutathione, myo-inositol, the excitation-inhibition balance and the ratio of glutamine to glutamate. These associations were observed in the ventral striatum but not the occipital lobe. Our methodological approach allowed us to gain a deeper understanding of the neuroscience underlying the links between ventral striatal function, anxiety and motivated behaviour. Thereby, we have extended the literature on the links between personality traits, social status and motivated behaviour in socially competitive contexts and the underlying neurobiology. These new findings pave the way for future experimental investigations to further elucidate the links between neurochemistry, mental health and socially competitive behaviour. A deep understanding of the neuroscience underlying personality traits and performance allow for effective interventions with the goal to ensure public health.

Learning, Stress and the Role of Personality Profiles in Rats

Basira Salehi, Maria del Carmen Sandi Perez

Stress has been shown to modulate many aspects of physiology and behavior. In particular, substantial work has confirmed that stress is a strong modulator of learning and memory processes. It is more than a century that Yerkes and Dodson have shown that relationship between stress intensity and memory function follows an inverted-U-shaped curve; memory increases with stress to an optimal point, above or below which memory decreases. Despite the great popularity of the Yerkes-Dodson law, the validity of the law has been criticized due to significant methodological problems in the study performed by Yerkes and Dodson (1908) and their data being judged insufficient to substantiate conclusions, among other reasons. Moreover the existing evidence has not yet illustrated this phenomenon under the same experimental conditions for relational learning tasks. On the other hand, stress is not the only factor that modulates cognitive abilities. Different types of learning and memory might be affected by other factors such as individual differences in personality. While the relationship between personality and learning has been studied in human, animal studies addressed to understanding the relationship between personality and learning have been rare. In addition, exposure to stress during pregnancy can have deleterious emotional effects on women. However, the mechanisms underlying these emotional effects are not well understood, and the development of suitable animal models for stress-induced depression in females still remains scarce. The goal of this Thesis was to investigate how stress affects cognitive and emotional processes in different animal models, and to explore the importance of individual differences in the mediation of stress effects. On a first study, we investigated the relationship between stress intensity and memory function. For this purpose cognitive abilities of rats to learn a radial arm water maze were assessed under different stress intensities, using behavioural and endocrine approaches. Our results confirm, for the first time, the existence of an inverted-U-shape memory function according to stressor intensity during the early learning and memory phases in a hippocampus-dependent task. Furthermore, we present evidence that these stress effects are not shown uniformly by all individuals; rather, performance at either the high or the low stress intensities is differentially affected in individuals with different personality-like profiles. In a second study, we investigated whether different personality traits in the Wistar outbred strain of rats were associated with performance in specific types of learning and memory tasks that have been reported to depend on specific brain areas, such as the amygdala, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (PFC). Using a wide variety of behavioral tests, we identified three personality factors: anxiety, exploration and locomotion. According to our results, the locomotion trait displayed no correlation with learning and memory. However curiosity trait predicted extinction of fear memories and spatial reversal learning, and the anxiety traits was related to extinction of fear. These results suggest that behavioral traits, anxiety and curiosity, might be linked to the functioning of specific brain areas (i.e. amygdala and PFC). Our findings are consistent with recent human studies showing that certain personality traits can predict academic achievement and point out the importance of constructing learning environments that could optimize individual strengths. In a third study, we used a model of stress during pregnancy in an attempt to mirror more closely than other experimental approaches based mainly on movement restraint procedures the human condition where stress is often persistently imposed by a male aggressive partner. For that purpose we used aggressive male rats that cohabitated with (and therefore can be considered a stressor) female rats during their pregnancy and, then, characterized the behaviour of these females after weaning. Similar to effects reported in humans, mother rats displayed anxiety-like and depressive-like behaviours, with the females presenting a high anxiety trait being the more vulnerable to the deleterious effects resulting from exposure to the aggressive male. These results propose an interesting animal model to study the effect of stress during pregnancy. Taken together, our results reinforce the view that stress has a strong impact on cognitive function and emotion. They also stress the importance of taking into account individual differences to characterize individuals with different vulnerability to be affected in both cognitive and emotional domain by exposure to stress. Our approach is novel and original in that it takes into account several behavioural (personality-like) traits simultaneously and shows the importance of different traits for different aspects of the relationship between stress, emotion and cognition. The approaches and findings provide valuable models to address the neurobiological mechanisms underlying stress effects on behavior.

EPFL2010

Psychobiological Vulnerability to Stress

Jorge Eduardo Castro Cifuentes, Maria del Carmen Sandi Perez

Several psychobiological factors are associated with vulnerability/resilience to stress-induced depression. Emerging evidence indicates behavioral traits, such as anxiety, can be related to depression-like symptoms after exposure to chronic stress. However, single traits cannot explain the variability observed in individual's vulnerability to stress, highlighting that a combination of behavioral traits might provide a better characterization of the individual's vulnerability to development of depression following prolonged stress. Hippocampal neurogenesis has been highlighted as a cellular mechanism involved in the reduction on hippocampal volume under conditions of stress and depression, suggesting that a lack of new cells and connections may underlie the cognitive and emotional symptoms of mood disorders, and modulating neurogenesis is regarded as a target/mechanism for antidepressants actions. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is expressed and potentially involved in cellular proliferation in the central nervous system. MIF was shown to induce cell cycle progression via activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) cascade. Stress has been shown to alter the degree of activation of the multifunctional ERK 1/2 -as indicated by its phosphorylation (p) pERK1/2- and pharmacological manipulations of the ERK pathway affected anxiety and coping behavior. Nonetheless, other mediating mechanisms are involved in the course of both depression and antidepressant actions. Even though the amygdala has been related to the etiology and recovery of depression through imaging studies showing correlations between these mood conditions and amygdala's volume and functional activation, the number of studies devoted to this brain area is still scarce. We hypothesize here an essential role of the amygdala on depression and antidepressant actions based on the implication of the basolateral complex (BLA) in emotional arousal and stress-induced modulation of cognitive processes, and on recent data showing activation of corticotropin releasing factor receptors (CRFR1) as a substrate for stress-induced alterations. Interestingly, alterations in the functional connectivity between the amygdala, the hippocampus and frontal areas have been identified in individuals with genetic vulnerability to depression. Looking for such psychobiological interactions is particularly important today because of increasingly incidence of depression and stress related disorders'. Identifying and understanding psychobiological vulnerability to stress is crucial for best oriented and more effective prevention and intervention strategies. Therefore, the aim of this thesis was: i) to identify in rats behavioral traits capable of predicting differences in vulnerability/resilience to the behavioral, endocrine, neurogenic and brain activity effects of stress, ii) to explore the role of the amygdala and personality traits in the antidepressants' effects on depression-like behavior and hippocampal neurogenesis, and iii) to study the role of MIF expression in hippocampal neurogenesis and anxiety- and depression- like behaviors. Our first study indicates that both the direction and intensity of the impact of stress on behavior corresponds to different patterns of neurogenesis impairment and brain activity; moreover, these effects are dependent on the interaction between personality traits and the length of stress exposure. Chronic stress induced progressively depressive-like symptoms associated with an increase in cell proliferation and a decrease of cell survival in the hippocampus and with a decrease in ERK1/2 activity in the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus and a U-shape effect in the amygdala. Personality-like profiles of high exploration seem to play a resilient role for the development of stress-induced depressive-like symptoms and the combination of high anxiety and low exploration seems to lead to higher vulnerability to develop depression-like behaviors. Whereas sub chronic stress increased cell proliferation in the combined profile of high anxiety and low exploration, profiles of low exploration showed a decrease in cell survival after exposure to chronic stress. Interestingly, ERK1/2 activity was decreased in control animals of the personality profile high anxiety and low exploration and subsequently increased after sub-chronic and chronic stress in the paraventricular nucleus, the amygdala and the hippocampus but not in the orbitofrontal cortex. The second study provides evidence for an important role for the amygdala on fluoxetine-stimulated cell proliferation and survival, as well as on the establishment of a link between cell proliferation and depression-like behavior. We also show an important role for anxiety in mediating the effects of basolateral amygdala and antidepressant activity on cell proliferation and survival. Chronic fluoxetine treatment had a positive effect on hippocampal cell survival only when the BLA was lesioned. Anxiety was related to hippocampal cell survival in opposite ways in sham- and BLA-lesioned animals (i.e., negatively in sham- and positively in BLA-lesioned animals). Both BLA lesions and low anxiety were critical factors to enable a negative relationship between cell proliferation and depression-like behavior. Therefore, our study highlights a role for the amygdala on fluoxetine-stimulated cell survival and on the establishment of a link between cell proliferation and depression-like behavior. It also reveals an important modulatory role for anxiety on cell proliferation involving both BLA-dependent and -independent mechanisms. The third study demonstrates the relevance of MIF expression for adult hippocampal neurogenesis. We identify MIF expression in neurogenic cells (in stem cells, cells undergoing proliferation and in newly proliferated cells undergoing maturation) in the subgranular zone of the rodent dentate gyrus. A causal role for MIF in cell proliferation was demonstrated using genetic and pharmacological approaches. Behaviorally, genetic deletion of MIF resulted in increased anxiety- and depression-like behaviors, as well as of impaired hippocampus-dependent memory. Together, our studies provide evidence supporting a pivotal role for MIF in both basal and antidepressant-stimulated adult hippocampal cell proliferation. Moreover, loss of MIF results in a behavioral phenotype that to a large extent corresponds with alterations predicted to arise from reduced hippocampal neurogenesis. These findings underscore MIF as a potentially relevant molecular target for the development of treatments linked to deficits in neurogenesis, as well as to problems related to anxiety, depression and cognition. Altogether the results presented support the idea of high anxiety trait individuals being a particularly prone phenotype and exposure to stressful life events as a requirement for individuals with this personality trait to develop depression.

EPFL2012

Stress pulls us apart: Anxiety leads to differences in competitive confidence under stress

Samuel Bendahan, Lorenz Goette, Fiona Hollis, Maria del Carmen Sandi Perez, John Christian Thoresen

Social competition is a fundamental mechanism of evolution and plays a central role in structuring individual interactions and communities. Little is known about the factors that affect individuals’ competitive success, particularly in humans. Key factors might include stress, a major evolutionary pressure that can affect the establishment of social hierarchies in animals, and individuals’ trait anxiety, which largely determines susceptibility to stress and constitutes an important determinant of differences in competitive outcomes. Using an economic-choice experiment to assess competitive self-confidence in 229 human subjects we found that, whereas competitive self-confidence is unaffected by an individual's anxiety level in control conditions, exposure to the Trier social stress test for groups drives the behavior of individuals apart: low-anxiety individuals become overconfident, and high-anxiety individuals become underconfident. Cortisol responses to stress were found to relate to self-confidence, with the direction of the effects depending on trait anxiety. Our findings identify stress as a major regulator of individuals’ competitiveness, affecting self-confidence in opposite directions in high and low anxious individuals. Therefore, our findings imply that stress may provide a new channel for generating social and economic inequality and, thus, not only be a consequence, but also a cause of inequality through its impact on competitive self-confidence and decision making in financially-relevant situations.