Publication

The Weakest Failure Detector for Non-Blocking Atomic Commit

Related publications (38)

Graph Chatbot

Chat with Graph Search

Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.

DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.

Fast General Distributed Transactions with Opacity

Aleksandar Dragojevic, Stanko Novakovic, Georgios Chatzopoulos

Transactions can simplify distributed applications by hiding data distribution, concurrency, and failures from the application developer. Ideally the developer would see the abstraction of a single large machine that runs transactions sequentially and neve ...

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY2019

The Complexity of Reliable and Secure Distributed Transactions

Junxiong Wang

The use of transactions in distributed systems dates back to the 70's. The last decade has also seen the proliferation of transactional systems. In the existing transactional systems, many protocols employ a centralized approach in executing a distributed ...

EPFL2018

Locking Timestamps versus Locking Objects

Rachid Guerraoui, Junxiong Wang, Tudor Alexandru David

We present multiversion timestamp locking (MVTL), a new genre of multiversion concurrency control algorithms for serializable transactions. The key idea behind MVTL is simple: lock individual timestamps instead of locking objects. After presenting a generi ...

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY2018

How Fast can a Distributed Transaction Commit?

Rachid Guerraoui, Junxiong Wang

The atomic commit problem lies at the heart of distributed database systems. The problem consists for a set of processes (database nodes) to agree on whether to commit or abort a transaction (agreement property). The commit decision can only be taken if al ...

2017

How Fast can a Distributed Transaction Commit?

Rachid Guerraoui, Junxiong Wang

ACM Press2017

Speculative Linearizability

Rachid Guerraoui, Viktor Kuncak, Giuliano Losa

Linearizability is a key design methodology for reasoning about implementations of concurrent abstract data types in both shared memory and message passing systems. It provides the illusion that operations execute sequentially and fault-free, despite the a ...

Assoc Computing Machinery2012

HydEE: Failure Containment without Event Logging for Large Scale Send-Deterministic MPI Applications

Thomas Ropars

High performance computing will probably reach exascale in this decade. At this scale, mean time between failures is expected to be a few hours. Existing fault tolerant protocols for message passing applications will not be efficient anymore since they eit ...

2012

Speculative Linearizability

Rachid Guerraoui, Viktor Kuncak, Giuliano Losa

2011

The Complexity Of Early Deciding Set Agreement

Rachid Guerraoui, Bastian Pochon

In the k-set agreement problem, each processor starts with a private input value and eventually decides on an output value. At most k distinct output values may be chosen, and every processor's output value must be one of the proposed values. We consider a ...

Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics2011

Transactions in the Jungle

Rachid Guerraoui, Michal Kapalka, Vasu Singh

Transactional memory (TM) has shown potential to simplify the task of writing concurrent programs. Inspired by classical work on databases, formal definitions of the semantics of TM executions have been proposed. Many of these definitions assumed that acce ...

Acm Order Department2010