In the law of the United States, diversity jurisdiction is a form of subject-matter jurisdiction that gives U.S. federal courts the power to hear lawsuits that do not involve a federal question. For a U.S. federal court to have diversity jurisdiction over a lawsuit, two conditions must be met. First, there must be "diversity of citizenship" between the parties, meaning the plaintiffs must be citizens of different U.S. states than the defendants. Second, the lawsuit's "amount in controversy" must be more than 75,000.Ifalawsuitdoesnotmeetthesetwoconditions,U.S.federalcourtswillnormallylackthepowertohearitunlessitinvolvesafederalquestion,andthelawsuitwouldneedtobeheardinstatecourtinstead.TheUnitedStatesConstitution,inArticleIII,Section2,grantsCongressthepowertopermitfederalcourtstoheardiversitycasesthroughlegislationauthorizingsuchjurisdiction.TheprovisionwasincludedbecausetheFramersoftheConstitutionwereconcernedthatwhenacaseisfiledinonestate,anditinvolvespartiesfromthatstateandanotherstate,thestatecourtmightbebiasedtowardthepartyfromthatstate.CongressfirstexercisedthatpowerandgrantedfederaltrialcircuitcourtsdiversityjurisdictionintheJudiciaryActof1789.Diversityjurisdictioniscurrentlycodifiedat.In1969,theAmericanLawInstituteexplainedina587−pageanalysisofthesubjectthatdiversityisthe"mostcontroversial"typeoffederaljurisdiction,becauseit"laysbarefundamentalissuesregardingthenatureandoperationofourfederalunion."(a)Thedistrictcourtsshallhaveoriginaljurisdictionofallcivilactionswherethematterincontroversyexceedsthesumorvalueof75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between—
(1) citizens of different States;
(2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State;
(3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and
(4) a foreign state, defined in section 1603(a) of this title, as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.