Cytodiérèse | EPFL Graph Search

La cytodiérèse est la division de la cellule lors de la division cellulaire (mitose ou méiose) ou, plus particulièrement, de la télophase (télophase 2 lors de la méiose) . Elle permet d'obtenir, à partir d'une cellule mère, deux cellules filles identiques. Cela peut aussi s'appliquer sur des cellules animales ou végétales. La cytodiérèse est autrement appelée le partage du cytoplasme La caryocinèse est le phénomène de séparation du noyau d'une cellule en deux parties distinctes (la mitose, qui est une division cellulaire sans rapport avec la fécondation, dite asexuée). Article connexe

Corps central

Notes et références Catégorie:Reproduction cellulaire

Isolation and Analysis of Regulators Coordinating the Nuclear Cycle with Cytokinesis in Schizosaccharomyces Pombe

Evelyn Lattmann

During the division of a mother cell into two daughter cells the genetic material of the mother cell is replicated and segregated to the daughter cells before the cytoplasm divides into two portions in a process called cytokinesis. In order to maintain the genetic stability of the daughter cells it is crucial that the bisection of the cells only occurs once the genetic material has been faithfully partitioned. In the model organism S. pombe the timely coordination of cytokinesis is regulated by a cellular signaling cascade called the Septation Initiation Network (SIN). The SIN is required for the formation and contraction of the contractile actomyosin ring (CAR) that assembles in the cell centre and guides the centripetal deposition of septum material during its contraction. Most of the regulators of the SIN are located to the SPB at some stage of the cell cycle. Interestingly, in anaphase B, when the SIN is supposed to be fully active, positive and negative regulators of the SIN localize to opposite SPBs. This asymmetric configuration of the SIN is lost at the end of cytokinesis, when the SIN is turned off; the positive regulators dissociate from the new SPB and the negative regulators assemble on this SPB. In order to understand this process in more detail we analyzed the localization of Cdc7p, a positive regulator of the SIN. We found that the disappearance of Cdc7p from the new SPB at the end of cytokinesis correlated with the separation of the two halves of the cytoplasm. Moreover, our data suggested that the separation of the two SPBs resulting from the completion of septum formation is important for the resetting of the SIN. Interestingly, we observed that Sid2p, the downstream effector of the SIN, was important for the maintenance of asymmetry in anaphase B and for the timing of the resetting of the SIN by acting in a negative feedback. Taken together, we suggested a model where the downstream effector of the SIN may promote the loading of the negative regulators to the SPBs; in anaphase to the old SPB (due to higher affinity of the negative regulators for this SPB) and upon cell separation to both SPBs, because the old SPB cannot buffer the negative feedback. In a separate study we designed a screen to isolate new regulators of the SIN. Mutagenesis of a strain that over-expressed spg1, the core activator of the SIN, led to the isolation of 28 mutants that are dependent on high levels of Spg1p for viability. The characterization of the nine heat-sensitive mutants among them revealed that they are all new alleles of known SIN genes. Interestingly, two mutants that mapped to the SIN effector sid2, lysed at the time of cytokinesis, when shifted to the restrictive temperature. This observation points to a possible role of the SIN in regulating cell separation. Surprisingly, one of the mutants that mapped to the essential positive SIN regulator sid1 contained a premature STOP codon after 243 nucleotides. The analysis of this mutant revealed that translational read-through level of the STOP codon is sufficient for successful cytokinesis. Similarly, high levels of sid1 expression did not interfere with cytokinesis. This indicated that the regulation of the SIN by Sid1p does not depend on its levels but on a precise control of its action. Since over expression of sid1 led to the accumulation of the protein in the nucleus this may hint that Sid1p recruitment to the SPB is regulated by nuclear proteins.

EPFL2012

Identification of genetic interactors of ypa2 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Manuela Moraru

In this study, the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe was used as a model system to study the cellular signaling that underlies cell cycle progression. Phosphorylation plays an important part in the regulation of this process. Kinases catalyze the transfer of a phosphate group to a substrate, which may regulate its activity. Protein phosphatases oppose the activity of protein kinases; the balance of their activities regulates signaling flux in many signaling pathways. The Septation Initiation Network (SIN) is a signaling cascade that regulates cytokinesis in fission yeast. SIN signaling is triggered by a GTPase and is transduced by three protein kinases; phosphorylation plays an important role in controlling SIN signalling. Numerous genetic screens and biochemical analyses have identified phosphatases and kinases that regulate the SIN. The protein phosphatases Calcineurin/Protein Phosphatase 2B (PP2B) and Flp1p promote SIN signaling, while PP2A is a SIN inhibitor. PP2A is conserved and is activated by the chaperone Phosphatase Two A Phosphatase Activator (PTPA). S. pombe has two PTPA-related genes, ypa1 and ypa2; the deletion mutant of the latter rescues SIN mutants which cannot undergo cytokinesis, consistent with PP2A opposing SIN signaling. The phenotype of the deletion mutant of ypa2, indicates that it is involved in the control of cell polarity, cell growth, mitotic commitment and cytokinesis. In this study, we characterized the hypomorphic allele ypa2-S2 which rescues SIN mutants, but is otherwise largely normal. ypa2-s2 was used as bait in a synthetic genetic array screen, to identify genes whose products compensate for reduced function of Ypa2p. A large number of hits were identified, of which approximately ninety percent are novel genetic interactors of ypa2. Validation studies indicated that eighty percent of the interactions seen in the high-throughput screen can be reconstructed. The identified genes regulate several biological processes, including signal transduction and protein phosphorylation. This prompted us to further characterize the roles of Ckb1p and Flp1p, in regulating cytokinesis signaling. Ckb1p is a regulatory subunit for Casein Kinase II (CK II), which was previously implicated in polar growth. The phenotype of the mutant ypa2-S2 ckb1-â indicates that Ckb1p, similar to Ypa2p, contributes to the regulation of mitotic commitment and cytokinesis signaling. Furthermore, ckb1-â showed negative genetic interaction with PP2A and SIN mutants. Flp1p is a protein phosphatase that was reported to regulate mitotic commitment and to promote SIN signaling. The double mutant between ypa2-S2 and flp1-â showed cell separation defects and phenotypic analysis of double mutants between flp1-â and PP2A mutants indicates that these phosphatases cooperate in cell separation. Overall, this work has uncovered novel facets of the regulation of cytokinesis in S. pombe, implicating CK II in controlling SIN signaling, and uncovering cooperative interactions between different phosphatases in controlling cytokinesis.

EPFL2016

Mid1p/anillin and the septation initiation network orchestrate contractile ring assembly for cytokinesis

Viesturs Simanis

In both animal cells and fungi, cytokinesis proceeds via a contractile actomyosin ring (CAR). Many CAR components and regulators are evolutionarily conserved. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the spatial cue for cytokinesis is provided by Mid1p/Anillin, whereas temporal coordination is ensured by the septation initiation network (SIN). However, neither Mid1p nor the SIN is considered to be essential for CAR assembly per se. Here, using 4D imaging, we reveal an unanticipated, novel role for the SIN in CAR assembly. We demonstrate that CAR assembly involves three, genetically separable steps: establishment of a cortical network of CAR proteins, its lateral condensation, and finally, the formation of a homogeneous CAR. We show that SIN mutants fail to form a homogeneous CAR; we identify hypophosphorylation and recruitment of the conserved PCH-family protein Cdc15p to the CAR as critical steps requiring SIN function. Furthermore, we show that in the absence of Mid1p, CAR assembly proceeds via an actomyosin filament, rather than a cortical network of CAR proteins. This mode of assembly is totally dependent on SIN signaling, thereby demonstrating a direct role for the SIN in CAR formation. Taken together, these data establish that Mid1p and the SIN are the key regulators that orchestrate CAR assembly.