Course à pied

Résumé

vignette|Course à Leer en Allemagne La course à pied est, avec la marche, l'un des deux modes de locomotion bipèdes de l'être humain. Caractérisée par une phase de suspension durant laquelle aucun des deux pieds ne touche le sol, elle permet un déplacement plus économe en énergie que la marche pour des vitesses allant d'environ (ultrafond) à plus de (sprint). Outre sa fonction locomotrice, elle est principalement pratiquée comme sport dans le cadre de l'athlétisme et en tant qu'exercice physique. Histoire La course aurait pour origine la capacité acquise depuis au moins quatre millions et demi d'années par les Australopithèques à marcher debout sur leurs deux jambes dans les arbres, Australopithèques issus peut-être d'un primate primitif lui aussi bipède de d'années. Cette bipédie a été utilisée occasionnellement pour se déplacer dans les arbres mais de manière permanente pour la marche et la course. Contrairement à la marche, et au trot et galop des quadrupèdes, elle p

Source officielle

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_%C3%A0_pied

À propos de ce résultat

Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.

Publications associées (56)

Publications associées

Chargement

Personnes associées (13)

Personnes associées

Chargement

Unités associées (5)

Unités associées

Chargement

Concepts associés (19)

Concepts associés

Chargement

Cours associés (13)

Cours associés

Chargement

Séances de cours associées (16)

Afficher plus

Séances de cours associées

Chargement

Sorting Algorithms

Ramatou Abibou

Implementation of a variety of sorting algorithms, and look at their behavior and running times on different inputs.

2005

Chargement

Augmented Cooper test: Biomechanical contributions to endurance performance

Kamiar Aminian, Salil Apte, Vincent Gremeaux, Simone Troxler

Running mechanics are modifiable with training and adopting an economical running technique can improve running economy and hence performance. While field measurement of running economy is cumbersome, running mechanics can be assessed accurately and conveniently using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs). In this work, we extended this wearables-based approach to the Cooper test, by assessing the relative contribution of running biomechanics to the endurance performance. Furthermore, we explored different methods of estimating the distance covered in the Cooper test using a wearable global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver. Thirty-three runners (18 highly trained and 15 recreational) performed an incremental laboratory treadmill test to measure their maximum aerobic speed (MAS) and speed at the second ventilatory threshold (sVT2). They completed a 12-minute Cooper running test with foot-worm IMUs and a chest-worn GNSS-IMU on a running track 1-2 weeks later. Using the GNSS receiver, an accurate estimation of the 12-minute distance was obtained (accuracy of 16.5 m and precision of 1.1%). Using this distance, we showed a reliable estimation [R-2 > 0.9, RMSE epsilon (0.07, 0.25) km/h] of the MAS and sVT2. Biomechanical metrics were extracted using validated algorithm and their association with endurance performance was estimated. Additionally, the high-/low-performance runners were compared using pairwise statistical testing. All performance variables, MAS, sVT2, and average speed during Cooper test, were predicted with an acceptable error (R-2 >= 0.65, RMSE

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA2022

Chargement

Correspondence Between Values of Vertical Loading Rate and Oxygen Consumption During Inclined Running

Kamiar Aminian, Mathieu Pascal Falbriard, Frédéric Meyer, Grégoire Millet

Purpose: The aim of this study was to provide a theoretical model to predict the vertical loading rate (VLR) at different slopes and speeds during incline running. Methods: Twenty-nine healthy subjects running at least once a week performed in a randomized order 4-min running trials on an instrumented treadmill at various speeds (8, 10, 12, and 14 km h(-1)) and slopes (- 20%, - 10%, - 5%, 0%, + 5%, + 10%,+ 15%,+ 20%). Heart rate, gas exchanges and ground reaction forces were recorded. The VLR was then calculated as the slope of the vertical force between 20 and 80% of the duration from initial foot contact to the impact peak. Results: There was no difference in VLR between the four different uphill conditions at given running speeds, but it was reduced by 27% at 5% slope and by 54% at 10% slope for the same metabolic demand (similar VO2), when compared to level running. The average VLR measured at maximal aerobic intensity during level running would be decreased by 52.7% at + 5%, by 63.0% at+ 10%, and by 73.3% at+ 15% slope. Moreover, VLR was dependent on the slope in downhill conditions. Conclusion: This study highlights the possibility to use uphill running to minimize rate of mechanical load (i.e., osteoarticular load) from foot impact on the ground and as a time-efficient exercise routine (i.e., same energy expenditure than in level running in less time).

SPRINGER2022

Chargement