Modifiable temporal unit problemThe Modified Temporal Unit Problem (MTUP) is a source of statistical bias that occurs in time series and spatial analysis when using temporal data that has been aggregated into temporal units. In such cases, choosing a temporal unit (e.g., days, months, years) can affect the analysis results and lead to inconsistencies or errors in statistical hypothesis testing. The MTUP is closely related to the modifiable areal unit problem or MAUP, in that they both relate to the scale of analysis and the issue of choosing an appropriate analysis.
Boundary problem (spatial analysis)A boundary problem in analysis is a phenomenon in which geographical patterns are differentiated by the shape and arrangement of boundaries that are drawn for administrative or measurement purposes. The boundary problem occurs because of the loss of neighbors in analyses that depend on the values of the neighbors. While geographic phenomena are measured and analyzed within a specific unit, identical spatial data can appear either dispersed or clustered depending on the boundary placed around the data.
Analyse spatialevignette|200px|Carte de cas de choléra pendant l'épidémie de 1854 à Londres L'analyse spatiale est une approche géographique qui étudie les localisations et les interactions spatiales en tant que composantes actives des fonctionnements sociétaux. Elle part du postulat selon lequel l'espace est acteur organisé. C'est une science nomothétique donc elle vise à proposer une approche modélisée de l'espace géographique en mettant en évidence des formes récurrentes d'organisation spatiales et des théories, notamment à travers diverses notions-clés : distance, réseaux, structure, .
Tobler's second law of geographyThe second law of geography, according to Waldo Tobler, is "the phenomenon external to a geographic area of interest affects what goes on inside." This is an extension of his first. He first published it in 1999 in reply to a paper titled "Linear pycnophylactic reallocation comment on a paper by D. Martin" and then again in response to criticism of his first law of geography titled "On the First Law of Geography: A Reply." Much of this criticism was centered on the question of if laws were meaningful in geography or any of the social sciences.
