Anesthésie générale

Résumé

L'anesthésie générale , ou AG, est un acte médical dont l'objectif principal est la suspension temporaire et réversible de la conscience et de la sensibilité douloureuse, au moyen de médicaments (drogues anesthésiques) administrés par voie intraveineuse et/ou inhalation. À cet objectif essentiel, permettant la réalisation sans mémorisation (dans la plupart des cas) et sans douleur des interventions chirurgicales et de certains examens invasifs, s'associe la nécessité d'un monitorage continu (suivi et contrôle) des fonctions vitales respiratoire (fréquence et volumes respiratoires, oxymétrie), hémodynamique (fréquence et rythme cardiaques, pression artérielle) et thermorégulatrice ainsi que le tonus musculaire. En raison des spécificités de l'approche technique, physiopathologique et pharmacologique du patient anesthésié et de l’impératif de sécurité qui entoure cet acte à toutes les étapes, la pratique médicale de l'anesthésie humaine n'est légalement possible en France qu'en présenc

Source officielle

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anesth%C3%A9sie_g%C3%A9n%C3%A9rale

À propos de ce résultat

Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.

Publications associées (11)

Publications associées

Chargement

Personnes associées (1)

Personnes associées

Chargement

Unités associées (1)

Unités associées

Chargement

Concepts associés (56)

Concepts associés

Chargement

Cours associés (2)

Cours associés

Chargement

Séances de cours associées (2)

Séances de cours associées

Chargement

The out-of body experience: precipitating factors and neural correlates

Olaf Blanke, Silvia Bünning

Out-of-body experiences (OBEs) are defined as experiences in which a person seems to be awake and sees his body and the world from a location outside his physical body. More precisely, they can be defined by the presence of the following three phenomenological characteristics: (i) disembodiment (location of the self outside one's body); (ii) the impression of seeing the world from an elevated and distanced visuo-spatial perspective (extracorporeal, but egocentric visuo-spatial perspective); and (iii) the impression of seeing one's own body (autoscopy) from this perspective. OBEs have fascinated mankind from time immemorial and are abundant in folklore, mythology, and spiritual experiences of most ancient and modern societies. Here, we review some of the classical precipitating factors of OBEs such as sleep, drug abuse, and general anesthesia as well as their neurobiology and compare them with recent findings on neurological and neurocognitive mechanisms of OBEs. The reviewed data suggest that OBEs are due to functional disintegration of lower-level multisensory processing and abnormal higher-level self-processing at the temporo-parietal junction. We argue that the experimental investigation of the interactions between these multisensory and cognitive mechanisms in OBEs and related illusions in combination with neuroimaging and behavioral techniques might further our understanding of the central mechanisms of corporal awareness and self-consciousness much as previous research about the neural bases of complex body part illusions such as phantom limbs has done.

Elsevier2005

Chargement

, , ,

Background and aim of the study: Formation of implicit memory during general anaesthesia is still debated. Perceptual learning is the ability to learn to perceive. In this study, an auditory perceptual learning paradigm, using frequency discrimination, was performed to investigate the implicit memory. It was hypothesized that auditory stimulation would successfully induce perceptual learning. Thus, initial thresholds of the frequency discrimination postoperative task should be lower for the stimulated group (group S) compared to the control group (group C). Material and method: Eighty-seven patients ASA I-III undergoing visceral and orthopaedic surgery during general anaesthesia lasting more than 60 minutes were recruited. The anaesthesia procedure was standardized (BISR monitoring included). Group S received auditory stimulation (2000 pure tones applied for 45 minutes) during the surgery. Twenty-four hours after the operation, both groups performed ten blocks of the frequency discrimination task. Mean of the thresholds for the first three blocks (T1) were compared between groups. Results: Mean age and BIS value of group S and group C are respectively 40 } 11 vs 42 } 11 years (p = 0,49) and 42 } 6 vs 41 } 8 (p = 0.87). T1 is respectively 31 } 33 vs 28 } 34 (p = 0.72) in group S and C. Conclusion: In our study, no implicit memory during general anaesthesia was demonstrated. This may be explained by a modulation of the auditory evoked potentials caused by the anaesthesia, or by an insufficient longer time of repetitive stimulation to induce perceptual learning.

Swiss Medical Publishers Ltd / EMH Swiss Medical Publishers2009

Chargement

Anesthesia prevents auditory perceptual learning

Carl Kristoffer Aberg, Alain Farron, Michael Herzog, Elisa Tartaglia

BACKGROUND: An auditory perceptual learning paradigm was used to investigate whether implicit memories are formed during general anesthesia. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I-III and were scheduled to undergo an elective surgery with general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group received auditory stimulation during surgery, whereas the other did not. The auditory stimulation consisted of pure tones presented via headphones. The Bispectral Index level was maintained between 40 and 50 during surgery. To assess learning, patients performed an auditory frequency discrimination task after surgery, and comparisons were made between the groups. General anesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with a mixture of fentanyl and sevoflurane. RESULTS: There was no difference in the amount of learning between the two groups (mean +/- SD improvement: stimulated patients 9.2 +/- 11.3 Hz, controls 9.4 +/- 14.1 Hz). There was also no difference in initial thresholds (mean +/- SD initial thresholds: stimulated patients 31.1 +/- 33.4 Hz, controls 28.4 +/- 34.2 Hz). These results suggest that perceptual learning was not induced during anesthesia. No correlation between the bispectral index and the initial level of performance was found (Pearson r = -0.09, P = 0.59). CONCLUSION: Perceptual learning was not induced by repetitive auditory stimulation during anesthesia. This result may indicate that perceptual learning requires top-down processing, which is suppressed by the anesthetic.

Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins2009

Chargement