Fee-for-service (FFS) is a payment model where services are unbundled and paid for separately.
In health care, it gives an incentive for physicians to provide more treatments because payment is dependent on the quantity of care, rather than quality of care. However evidence of the effectiveness of FFS in improving health care quality is mixed, without conclusive proof that these programs either succeed or fail. Similarly, when patients are shielded from paying (cost-sharing) by health insurance coverage, they are incentivized to welcome any medical service that might do some good. Fee-for-services raises costs, and discourages the efficiencies of integrated care. A variety of reform efforts have been attempted, recommended, or initiated to reduce its influence (such as moving towards bundled payments and capitation). In capitation, physicians are not incentivized to perform procedures, including necessary ones, because they are not paid anything extra for performing them.
FFS is the dominant physician payment method in the United States. In the Japanese health care system, FFS is mixed with a nationwide price setting mechanism (all-payer rate setting) to control costs.
In the health insurance and the health care industries, FFS occurs if doctors and other health care providers receive a fee for each service such as an office visit, test, procedure, or other health care service. Payments are issued only after the services are provided. FFS is potentially inflationary by raising health care costs.
FFS creates a potential financial conflict of interest with patients, as it incentivizes overutilization,—treatments with an inappropriately excessive volume or cost.
FFS does not incentivize physicians to withhold services. If bills are paid under FFS by a third party, patients (along with doctors) have no incentive to consider the cost of treatment. Patients can welcome services under third-party payers because "when people are insulated from the cost of a desirable product or service, they use more.
Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.
Une Managed Care Organisation (MCO) est un type d'organisation d'assurance maladie aux États-Unis. Il compte deux types d'organisations avec des modèles différents : les PPO () et les HMO (). Les HMO restreignent les soins de santé à l'intérieur d'un réseau spécifique (d'hôpitaux, de médecins, etc.), mais avec un PPO, plus coûteux, il est possible de consulter où on veut. Les HMO sont devenus très répandus depuis le , qui a notamment requis des entreprises employant plus de 25 salariés qu'elles offrent à ces derniers la possibilité de souscrire gratuitement à une HMO.
In U.S. health insurance, a preferred provider organization (PPO), sometimes referred to as a participating provider organization or preferred provider option, is a managed care organization of medical doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers who have agreed with an insurer or a third-party administrator to provide health care at reduced rates to the insurer's or administrator's clients. A preferred provider organization is a subscription-based medical care arrangement.
Le Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (en français, Loi sur la Protection des Patients et les Soins Abordables), surnommée « Obamacare », est une loi votée par la législature du Congrès des États-Unis et promulguée par le président Barack Obama le . Elle constitue le principal volet de la réforme du système de protection sociale aux États-Unis, avec le Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act.
In the frame of therapeutic drug monitoring and personalized medicine, point-of-care systems (POCs) that can help overcome long waiting times for results and costly procedures of clinical tests are highly desirable. At present, the detection of low-molecul ...