Publication
Due to a small manual rounding error, an incorrect central value was quoted in table 4 for the C 9τ parameter. The correct result is given by C 9τ = (−1.2 ± 2.6 ± 1.0) × 10 2 , (1) instead of (−1.0±2.6±1.0)×10 2 , corresponding to a difference of −0.2×10 2 from the incorrect result. This small difference is approximately 7% relative to the total uncertainty on the C 9τ parameter and has no significant impact on the results of the analysis or their interpretation. A small correction is applied to the results of the fit in the signal region to correct the signal amplitude parameters for various biases. This correction includes asymptotic biases from pseudoexperiments reported in table 3 along with additional biases from neglecting exotic charmonium-like contributions as discussed in section 5.2. The correction has already been applied in the parameter results given in tables 4-8. Unfortunately, when producing the confidence region plots for the C 10 parameter in figures 6 (top right) and 7 (top left and bottom left) the correction was added with the wrong sign. The result is that the central value for the C 10 parameter was shifted by twice the value of the correction in the negative direction. The correct central value is shifted by +0.18 relative to the incorrect value, corresponding to 75% of the total uncertainty on the C 10 parameter. This mistake only affects the aforementioned plots and not any of the quoted results. In particular, the quoted result for the C 10 parameter in table 4, upon which all discussions and interpretations are based, remains the correct value. The updated plots with the correct central value for the C 10 parameter are shown in figure 1 for the one-dimensional confidence region and in figure 2 for the two-dimensional confidence regions.