Stimulus sampling as an exploration mechanism for fast reinforcement learning

Reinforcement learning in neural networks requires a mechanism for exploring new network states in response to a single, nonspecific reward signal. Existing models have introduced synaptic or neuronal noise to drive this exploration. However, those types of noise tend to almost average out—precluding or significantly hindering learning —when coding in neuronal populations or by mean firing rates is considered. Furthermore, careful tuning is required to find the elusive balance between the often conflicting demands of speed and reliability of learning. Here we show that there is in fact no need to rely on intrinsic noise. Instead, ongoing synaptic plasticity triggered by the naturally occurring online sampling of a stimulus out of an entire stimulus set produces enough fluctuations in the synaptic efficacies for successful learning. By combining stimulus sampling with reward attenuation, we demonstrate that a simple Hebbian-like learning rule yields the performance that is very close to that of primates on visuomotor association tasks. In contrast, learning rules based on intrinsic noise (node and weight perturbation) are markedly slower. Furthermore, the performance advantage of our approach persists for more complex tasks and network architectures. We suggest that stimulus sampling and reward attenuation are two key components of a framework by which any single-cell supervised learning rule can be converted into a reinforcement learning rule for networks without requiring any intrinsic noise source.

Models of Reward-Modulated Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity

Nicolas Frémaux

How do animals learn to repeat behaviors that lead to the obtention of food or other “rewarding” objects? As a biologically plausible paradigm for learning in spiking neural networks, spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) has been shown to perform well in unsupervised learning tasks such as receptive field development. However, STDP fails to take behavioral relevance into account, and as such is inadequate to explain a vast range of learning tasks in which the final outcome, conditioned on the prior execution of a series of actions, is signaled to an animal through sparse rewards. In this thesis, I show that the addition of a third, global, reward-based factor to the pre- and postsynaptic factors of STDP is a promising solution to this problem, consistent with experimental findings. One one hand, dopamine is a neuromodulator which has been shown to encode reward signals in the brain. On the other hand, STDP has been shown to be affected by dopamine, even though the precise nature of the interaction is unclear. Moreover, the theoretical framework of reinforcement learning provides strong foundation for the analysis of these learning rules. After studying existing examples of such rules in a navigation task, I derive simple functional requirements for reward-modulated learning rules, and illustrate these in a motor learning task. One of those functional requirements is the existence a “critic” structure, constantly evaluating the potential for rewarding events. The implication of the existence of such a critic on the interpretation of psychophysical experiments are also discussed. Finally, I propose a biologically plausible implementation of such a structure, that performs motor or navigational tasks. This is based on a generalization of temporal difference learning, a well-known reinforcement learning framework, to continuous time, well suited to an implementation with spiking neurons. These result provide a unified picture of reward-modulated learning rules: even though different rules have been proposed, these can be reduced to a single model at the synaptic level, with variations in the computation of the neuromodulatory signal enabling switching between different learning rules.

EPFL2013

Biologically plausible unsupervised learning in shallow and deep neural networks

Bernd Albert Illing

The way our brain learns to disentangle complex signals into unambiguous concepts is fascinating but remains largely unknown. There is evidence, however, that hierarchical neural representations play a key role in the cortex. This thesis investigates biologically plausible models of unsupervised learning of hierarchical representations as found in the brain and modern computer vision models. We use computational modeling to address three main questions at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and computational neuroscience.The first question is: What are useful neural representations and when are deep hierarchical representations needed? We approach this point with a systematic study of biologically plausible unsupervised feature learning in a shallow 2-layer networks on digit (MNIST) and object (CIFAR10) classification. Surprisingly, random features support high performance, especially for large hidden layers. When combined with localized receptive fields, random feature networks approach the performance of supervised backpropagation on MNIST, but not on CIFAR10. We suggest that future models of biologically plausible learning should outperform such random feature benchmarks on MNIST, or that such models should be evaluated in different ways.The second question is: How can hierarchical representations be learned with mechanisms supported by neuroscientific evidence? We cover this question by proposing a unifying Hebbian model, inspired by common models of V1 simple and complex cells based on unsupervised sparse coding and temporal invariance learning. In shallow 2-layer networks, our model reproduces learning of simple and complex cell receptive fields, as found in V1. In deeper networks, we stack multiple layers of Hebbian learning but find that it does not yield hierarchical representations of increasing usefulness. From this, we hypothesise that standard Hebbian rules are too constrained to build increasingly useful representations, as observed in higher areas of the visual cortex or deep artificial neural networks.The third question is: Can AI inspire learning models that build deep representations and are still biologically plausible? We address this question by proposing a learning rule that takes inspiration from neuroscience and recent advances in self-supervised deep learning. The proposed rule is Hebbian, i.e. only depends on pre- and post-synaptic neuronal activity, but includes additional local factors, namely predictive dendritic input and widely broadcasted modulation factors. Algorithmically, this rule applies self-supervised contrastive predictive learning to a causal, biological setting using saccades. We find that networks trained with this generalised Hebbian rule build deep hierarchical representations of images, speech and video.We see our modeling as a potential starting point for both, new hypotheses, that can be tested experimentally, and novel AI models that could benefit from added biological realism.

EPFL2021

Learning flexible sensori-motor mappings in a complex network

Walter Senn, Eleni Vasilaki

Given the complex structure of the brain, how can synaptic plasticity explain the learning and forgetting of associations when these are continuously changing? We address this question by studying different reinforcement learning rules in a multilayer network in order to reproduce monkey behavior in a visuomotor association task. Our model can only reproduce the learning performance of the monkey if the synaptic modifications depend on the pre- and postsynaptic activity, and if the intrinsic level of stochasticity is low. This favored learning rule is based on reward modulated Hebbian synaptic plasticity and shows the interesting feature that the learning performance does not substantially degrade when adding layers to the network, even for a complex problem.