Drosophila host defense after oral infection by an entomopathogenic Pseudomonas species

Drosophila has been shown to be a valuable model for the investigation of host-pathogen interactions. Study of the Drosophila immune response has been hampered, however, by the lack of true Drosophila pathogens. In nearly all studies reported, the bacteria used were directly injected within the body cavity of the insect, bypassing the initial steps of a natural interaction. Here, we report the identification of a previously uncharacterized bacterial species, Pseudomonas entomophila (Pe), which has the capacity to induce the systemic expression of antimicrobial peptide genes in Drosophila after ingestion. In contrast to previously identified bacteria, Pe is highly pathogenic to both Drosophila larvae and adults, and its persistence in larvae leads to a massive destruction of gut cells. Using this strain, we have analyzed the modulation of the larval transcriptome upon bacterial infection. We found that natural infection by Pe induces a dramatic change in larval gene expression. In addition to immunity genes, our study identifies many genes associated with Pe pathogenesis that have been previously unreported.

The contribution of the host stress response to the pathogenesis of Pseudomonas entomophila in the Drosophila intestine

Sveta Chakrabarti

Recently, several studies done in Drosophila have revealed that efficient and rapid recovery from bacterial infection in the gut is possible only when bacterial clearance by the immune system is coordinated with repair through renewal of the epithelium damaged by infection. In this thesis, I have analyzed how the entomopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas entomophila affects the immune response and epithelium renewal. A microarray analysis first showed that P. entomophila is recognized by the Drosophila immune system since ingestion of this bacterium stimulated the expression of antimicrobial peptide genes by the Imd pathway. In addition, stress and damage related pathways were strongly induced by P. entomophila, which correlate with its capacity to inflict severe damage. While antibacterial genes were induced in the gut following infection with P. entomophila, the immune response was not productive due to a general inhibition of translation that affected all the newly synthesized transcripts. Furthermore, the blockage of translation also inhibited the repair program by blocking the production of JAK-STAT ligands (upd3, upd2) and growth factors, which stimulate the intestinal stem cells proliferation and differentiation. I next analyzed the pathways that link cellular damage to reduction of translation. Using a genetic approach, I showed that inhibition of translation was induced by two signaling pathways: i) the phosphorylation of elongation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) by the stress kinase GCN2 and ii) the inhibition of the TOR pathway by the AMPK kinase. Both kinases sense metabolic deprivation, suggesting that cellular damages induced by P. entomophila induce a state of “starvation”. Inhibition of translation is usually an adaptive cellular response to adjust the metabolism to the energy status of the cells. The observation that GCN2-deficient flies survived better than wild-type flies to P. entomophila indicates that pathogenesis is linked to an over-activation of stress pathways that usually help to endure the consequence of an infection. In this in vivo model of infection, I also showed that the reduction of translation was a consequence of cellular damage to the intestine caused by host-derived reactive oxygen species (through the activity of Duox) and by the direct action of a pore-forming toxin produced by the pathogen. As a consequence of this translational arrest, flies succumbed P. entomophila infection because they were unable to repair gut damage. Finally, I showed that inhibition of translation also had a strong influence on innate immune responses observed upon P. entomophila infection. The specific activation of a systemic immune response (antimicrobial peptides produced by the fat body) observed upon P. entomophila infection could be recapitulated by feeding flies with a non-lethal pathogen and an inhibitor of translation. Hence, I showed translation inhibition could be an important feature that shapes the immune response. The p38 MAPK family is involved in stress and immunity in both mammals and Drosophila. In Drosophila, three p38-MAPK-encoding genes, p38a, p38b and p38c, have been identified but their function in the gut immune response is poorly characterized. In the second part of my thesis, I have analyzed the role of these three p38 MAPKs in Drosophila intestinal immunity, especially p38c, which is strongly enriched in the gut. I first confirmed that the three p38 are involved kinases are involved in the defense to oral infection with pathogenic (but non-lethal) bacteria such as Erwinia carotovora 15. Surprisingly, p38c mutant flies were more resistant to P. entomophila and did not show the reduction in translation observed in wild-type flies. Interestingly, the transcription of the ROS producing enzyme Duox was reduced in p38c raising the hypothesis that p38 contributes to P. entomophila pathogenicity by activating Duox. Furthermore, I have obtained preliminary data indicating that p38c and the transcription factor ATF-3 act in the same pathway contributing the host immune response and lipid metabolism. Together, my thesis reveals the complex cross-talks between stress and immune pathways during microbial infection. While, it shows that stress pathways usually contribute to endure the damage caused by infection, excessive activation of these pathways can contribute to pathogenesis.

EPFL2013

PIMS modulates immune tolerance by negatively regulating Drosophila innate immune signaling

Bruno Lemaitre

Metazoans tolerate commensal-gut microbiota by suppressing immune activation while maintaining the ability to launch rapid and balanced immune reactions to pathogenic bacteria. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying the establishment of this threshold. We report that a recently identified Drosophila immune regulator, which we call PGRP-LC-interacting inhibitor of Imd signaling (PIMS), is required to suppress the Imd innate immune signaling pathway in response to commensal bacteria. pims expression is Imd (immune deficiency) dependent, and its basal expression relies on the presence of commensal flora. In the absence of PIMS, resident bacteria trigger constitutive expression of antimicrobial peptide genes (AMPs). Moreover, pims mutants hyperactivate AMPs upon infection with Gram-negative bacteria. PIMS interacts with the peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP-LC), causing its depletion from the plasma membrane and shutdown of Imd signaling. Therefore, PIMS is required to establish immune tolerance to commensal bacteria and to maintain a balanced Imd response following exposure to bacterial infections.

2008

Prevalence of local immune response against oral infection in a Drosophila/Pseudomonas infection model

Bruno Lemaitre

Pathogens have developed multiple strategies that allow them to exploit host resources and resist the immune response. To study how Drosophila flies deal with infectious diseases in a natural context, we investigated the interactions between Drosophila and a newly identified entomopathogen, Pseudomonas entomophila. Flies orally infected with P. entomophila rapidly succumb despite the induction of both local and systemic immune responses, indicating that this bacterium has developed specific strategies to escape the fly immune response. Using a combined genetic approach on both host and pathogen, we showed that P. entomophila virulence is multi-factorial with a clear differentiation between factors that trigger the immune response and those that promote pathogenicity. We demonstrate that AprA, an abundant secreted metalloprotease produced by P. entomophila, is an important virulence factor. Inactivation of aprA attenuated both the capacity to persist in the host and pathogenicity. Interestingly, aprA mutants were able to survive to wild-type levels in immune-deficient Relish flies, indicating that the protease plays an important role in protection against the Drosophila immune response. Our study also reveals that the major contribution to the fly defense against P. entomophila is provided by the local, rather than the systemic immune response. More precisely, our data points to an important role for the antimicrobial peptide Diptericin against orally infectious Gram-negative bacteria, emphasizing the critical role of local antimicrobial peptide expression against food-borne pathogens.

2006

The contribution of the host stress response to the pathogenesis of Pseudomonas entomophila in the Drosophila intestine

Sveta Chakrabarti

EPFL2013