KAP1 regulates gene networks controlling T-cell development and responsiveness

Chromatin remodeling at specific genomic loci controls lymphoid differentiation. Here, we investigated the role played in this process by Kruppel-associated box (KRAB)-associated protein 1 (KAP1), the universal cofactor of KRAB-zinc finger proteins (ZFPs), a tetrapod-restricted family of transcriptional repressors. T-cell-specific Kap1-deleted mice displayed a significant expansion of immature thymocytes, imbalances in CD4(+)/CD8(+) cell ratios, and altered responses to TCR and TGFβ stimulation when compared to littermate KAP1 control mice. Transcriptome and chromatin studies revealed that KAP1 binds T-cell-specific cis-acting regulatory elements marked by the H3K9me3 repressive mark and enriched in Ikaros/NuRD complexes. Also, KAP1 directly controls the expression of several genes involved in TCR and cytokine signaling. Among these, regulation of FoxO1 seems to play a major role in this system. Likely responsible for tethering KAP1 to at least part of its genomic targets, a small number of KRAB-ZFPs are selectively expressed in T-lymphoid cells. These results reveal the so far unsuspected yet important role of KAP1-mediated epigenetic regulation in T-lymphocyte differentiation and activation.- Santoni de Sio, F. R., Barde, I., Offner, S., Kapopoulou, A., Corsinotti, A., Bojkowska, K., Genolet, R., Thomas, J. H., Luescher, I. F., Pinschewer, D., Harris, N., Trono, D. KAP1 regulates gene networks controlling T-cell development and responsiveness.

Genomic Context and KRAB/KAP1-mediated Transcriptional Repression

Sylvain Meylan

Chromatin structure and its impact on transcriptional activity represent one of the major revolutions in the biomedical field over the passed decade. The implications concern as much fundamental as clinically-oriented research; diseases and therapeutical strategies are being approached from a new point of view (Mackay et al., 2008; Richman et al., 2009). The current work dissects the different susceptibilities of genes in the human genome and how these react to the changes in chromatin landscape upon the recruitment of a transcriptional corepressor. The KRAB-Zinc finger proteins are the largest family of transcriptional repressors in the human genome. These repressors use the KRAB domain as a docking site for KAP-1 which in turn recruits a macromolecular chromatin-remodelling complex leading to heterochromatin formation. Yet current knowledge of their impact on gene regulation is limited. By artificially recruiting a KRAB-repressor in the context of genes, our lab has previously shown that this repression can act over several tens of kilobases (Groner et al., 2010). Specifically, transcriptional silencing depends on the spreading of repressive marks to the upstream promoter. However, such spreading to the trapped promoter is not systematic, suggesting potential counter-acting influences. To identify the determinants of repression, we designed a high-throughput approach of our experimental system to accumulate thousands of KRAB docking sites for which the trapped promoter is regulable and docking sites for which the promoter is immune to repression. Firstly, our data indicate that KRAB/KAP-1-repression can act efficiently over distances of 20 kb albeit in a very variable fashion, but is limited beyond that. Second, propagation of repression in the transcribed regions was favoured in most open chromatin. Third, we observed that the broader context of genes sustaining repression was that of most euchromatic regions, recapitulating the genetic context of natural targets of KAP1 repression. On the other hand, we have no evidence that barrier elements such as CTCF counteract this KRAB-mediated repression within genes. Finally, work on cases where repression acts over distances greater than 40 kb hints at the regulation of enhancers by our KRAB repressor rather than promoter. In conclusion, this work broadens the knowledge in the emerging field of gene regulation and provides further insight on the complexity of chromatin architecture and its meaning at a functional level.

EPFL2010

Studies on KRAB/KAP1-Mediated Transcriptional Repression

Anna Claire Groner

The sequencing of the human genome revealed that the C2H2-zinc finger proteins (ZFPs) are the largest family of human transcription factors. Around 300 members of this family contain, in addition to their zinc finger motifs, a KRAB domain that has been implicated in transcriptional repression. It is thought that KRAB-ZFPs mediate this effect through the recruitment of the corepressor KAP1, which induces facultative heterochromatin through the activity of several associated chromatin-modifying factors. Our studies focused on the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of transcriptional repression induced by KRAB-ZFPs and KAP1. For this, we made use of the conditional binding activity of the KRAB-containing repressor tTRKRAB. This ectopic protein serves as a paradigm for endogenous KRAB-ZFP functions, as it depends on cellular KAP1 for transcriptional repression. tTRKRAB only binds to heterologous TetO sites in the absence of doxycycline, thus making repressor activity drug-regulated. When we targeted the repressor to euchromatic sites modified with TetO, we found that it induced increased levels of H3K9me3 and HP1β at the genes it bound to. We also monitored the effect of repressor binding on transcription by assessing the activity of TetO-containing reporter genes that were driven by endogenous promoters and that were initially used to create euchromatic tTRKRAB binding sites. This analysis revealed that KRAB/KAP1 mediated long-range heterochromatin spreading, which only resulted in transcriptional repression if repressive marks reached the promoter and impaired transcriptional initiation. The efficiency of this process was highest in an environment of very strong gene activity, as indicated by the levels of active histone modifications. We found that KRAB-ZFP genes themselves are probably targets of KRAB/KAP1-mediated repression and elucidated their transcriptional regulation and chromatin structure. KAP1 was localized to the promoter and to the 3' end of KRAB-ZFP genes, suggesting self-regulatory loops. However, only KAP1 localized to the 3' end of KRAB-ZFP genes mediated increased levels of H3K9me3 and HP1β along the gene body, without affecting the promoter. Therefore, KAP1 is involved in controlling the spread of heterochromatin at these endogenous sites, largely without regulating transcription. The function of this heterochromatic chromatin landscape may lie in the protection from chromosomal rearrangements between highly homologous KRAB-ZFP genes. Despite this repressive structure, KRAB-ZFP genes are still expressed, as high levels of transcription-associated H3K36me3 accompany H3K9me3 throughout the gene bodies. Other projects described in this thesis include the elucidation of the role of KAP1 in behavior and the assessment of KRAB/KAP1-mediated repression in the context of episomal structures. Both of these areas are of scientific and biomedical interest and address basic principles of the molecular mechanisms of KRAB/KAP1-mediated transcriptional repression.

EPFL2011

Phase specific transcriptional regulation of circadian clock and metabolism in mouse liver

Jonathan Aryeh Sobel

The molecular clock has been conserved from cyanobacteria to mammals and is believed to align behavioral and biochemical processes with the diurnal cycle. This cellular mechanism has been an advantage to increase the fitness of organisms through the ability to anticipate food availability or predator presence. Accumulating evidence has revealed that the circadian clock is intimately interconnected with the metabolic cycle. But, the nature of these interconnections is yet not clear at the transcriptional level, and the contribution of cis-regulatory modules has not been elucidated. Accessible chromatin regions of the genome are implicated in diverse processes, such as gene regulation through enhancers and promoters, insulation of genomic domains or alternative splicing. They allow cell-type specific programs that are controlled by tissue-specific transcription factors and chromatin modifiers, although tissue-specific regulation of the circadian clock remains unclear. Therefore, we compared genome-wide BMAL1 binding and chromatin accessibility in the liver and in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Moreover, for the first time, our study explores the dynamics of accessible regions, histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac) and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) every 4 hours over one day in mouse liver. In this study, we show that a substantial fraction of these accessible sites are oscillating during a diurnal cycle with a circadian period. We observed that these accessible regions are enriched in the proximity of actively transcribed genes, and that they are dynamically affected by the binding of transcription factors such as BMAL1. We investigated wild-type (WT) and Bmal1-/- genotypes, in night restricted feeding regimen and in Light-Dark (LD) cycle, to study the circadian clock regulatory network underlying diurnal transcription. Therefore, we applied a penalized generalized linear model to infer the activity of transcription factor binding motifs in oscillating accessible sites using Pol II loadings at the transcription start sites of nearby genes. We were able to recapitulate the known regulatory elements of the circadian clock, notably E-box, D-Box, and ROR-responsive elements (RRE) in the WT genotype. On the other hand, we found that Forkhead box (FOX), glucocorticoids responsive elements (GRE), and C-AMP Response Element (CRE) were the main contributors of the regulation of oscillating genes in Bmal1-/-. Finally, using a mixture model to detect footprints with a base pair resolution, we studied the dynamics of the accessibility overlapping E-box. Our last analysis suggested that BMAL1/CLOCK is binding on double E-boxes with a spacer of 6 or 7 bp in a hetero-tetramer configuration. A 3D structure model further supported this binding mode. In Summary, we used DNase I-seq and ChIP-seq of Pol II and H3K27ac to study the circadian chromatin landscape in a 4h time-resolved experimental design. We uncovered the underlying circadian transcriptional regulatory network and, we dissected the chromatin accessibility around BMAL1 binding sites at a base pair resolution, which led to an unappreciated mode of binding of BMAL1/CLOCK in a hetero-tetramer conformation on double E-boxes. Lastly, we found tissue-specific factors that might contribute to tissue-specific binding of BMAL1/CLOCK.

EPFL2016