Modelling Drifting Snow Sublimation and Investigating Small-Scale Snow Transport

Drifting snow has a large influence on the mountain snow cover and the overlying atmospheric boundary layer. Consequently, drifting snow also affects avalanches, snow hydrology, vegetation and climate. Considerable effort is devoted to understanding the process in order to model the effects on the mountain snow cover or the overlying atmosphere. This thesis work aims to I) provide estimates of drifting snow sublimation within a small catchment in the Swiss Alps and II) test an alternative method to describe snow transport on short time and small spatial scales. Drifting snow sublimation moistens and cools the surrounding air and causes a loss of snow mass. Based on the feedback mechanisms integrating air temperature, humidity and snow concentration, it should be seen as a self-limiting process. Drifting snow sublimation (including these feedback mechanisms) has been implemented in Alpine3D, which is a high-resolution snow transport model for alpine terrain. This model has been applied to a small area in the Swiss Alps for a case study of approximately two days. Results show that, in general, the negative feedbacks of sublimation on the snow mass concentration, air temperature, and humidity are small. They are, however, relevant on the slope scale, as could be retrieved from analyzing the deposition on a leeward slope. Compared to a reference simulation without sublimation, drifting snow sublimation reduced the deposition by approximately 12% on this leeward slope when omitting all feedback mechanisms. In a simulation where all feedbacks were included, drifting snow sublimation reduced the snow deposition on this slope by 10%. Drifting snow sublimation thus appears to be a significant process for a leeward slope influenced by drifting snow. On the contrary, the spatially averaged reduction of deposition due to drifting snow sublimation in the complete modelled domain was 2.3%. During this case study, this value was comparable to surface sublimation. At the same field site a simulation of a complete season was performed and in this case, sublimation of drifting snow was accounted for only in the absence of concurrent precipitation. As for the case study, the slope affected the most by drifting snow sublimation was shown to be a leeward slope for SE wind. This could be explained by generally warmer and dryer conditions during periods with SE wind. In this particular slope, the snow amount was reduced by about 1.8% due to drifting snow sublimation. For the complete domain however, the model results indicate that drifting snow sublimation is much smaller than surface sublimation and negligible for the total water equivalent. Thus, at the studied field site drifting snow sublimation seems only significant locally or on short time scales. Limitations of drifting snow simulations based on mean wind fields are seen as the variability of the snow cover is underestimated on scales of few meters. Moreover, these models are also not able to represent snow transport on very short time scales. High-frequency observations of drifting snow and sand saltation have shown that turbulent structures have an influence on the snow or sand mass flux. Improvements in modelling drifting snow on such time scales can thus be reached by considering turbulence. Here, a combination of wind fields from large eddy simulations and a Lagrangian stochastic model was used to describe snow particle trajectories over flat terrain. This model reproduced a time series of the snow mass flux that qualitatively corresponds to observations from the Weissfluhjoch Versuchsfeld. Furthermore, results show that the use of the surface shear stress rather than the friction velocity, as in conventional models, resulted in a spatial variation of drifting snow despite homogeneous snow properties and the flatness of the considered terrain. The distribution of the surface shear stress in space and time was found reasonable yet narrow based on the ratio between the standard deviation and the mean shear stress, which was 0.17 compared to a value of 0.4 reported for measurements. Nonetheless, this variable surface shear stress played a key role in the modelled spatial variation of drifting snow. This also points at a relevant influence of the particle aerodynamic entrainment process for drifting snow. The results thus show that this model seems to overcome limitations of conventional three-dimensional snow transport models as it gives a more realistic description of drifting snow on short time scales and it may be used to gain further insight in drifting snow.