In set theory, -induction, also called epsilon-induction or set-induction, is a principle that can be used to prove that all sets satisfy a given property. Considered as an axiomatic principle, it is called the axiom schema of set induction.
The principle implies transfinite induction and recursion.
It may also be studied in a general context of induction on well-founded relations.
The schema is for any given property of sets and states that, if for every set , the truth of follows from the truth of for all elements of , then this property holds for all sets.
In symbols:
Note that for the "bottom case" where denotes the empty set , the subexpression is vacuously true for all propositions and so that implication is proven by just proving .
In words, if a property is persistent when collecting any sets with that property into a new set (and this also requires establishing the property for the empty set), then the property is simply true for all sets. Said differently, persistence of a property with respect to set formation suffices to reach each set in the domain of discourse.
One may use the language of classes to express schemata.
Denote the universal class by .
Let be and use the informal as abbreviation for .
The principle then says that for any ,
Here the quantifier ranges over all sets.
In words this says that any class that contains all of its subsets is simply just the class of all sets.
Assuming bounded separation, is a proper class. So the property is exhibited only by the proper class , and in particular by no set. Indeed, note that any set is a subset of itself and under some more assumptions, already the self-membership will be ruled out.
For comparison to another property, note that for a class to be -transitive means
There are many transitive sets - in particular the set theoretical ordinals.
If is for some predicate , then with ,
where is defined as .
If is the universal class, then this is again just an instance of the schema.
But indeed if is any -transitive class, then still and a version of set induction for holds inside of .
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.
Set Theory as a foundational system for mathematics. ZF, ZFC and ZF with atoms. Relative consistency of the Axiom of Choice, the Continuum Hypothesis, the reals as a countable union of countable sets,
Axiomatic constructive set theory is an approach to mathematical constructivism following the program of axiomatic set theory. The same first-order language with "" and "" of classical set theory is usually used, so this is not to be confused with a constructive types approach. On the other hand, some constructive theories are indeed motivated by their interpretability in type theories. In addition to rejecting the principle of excluded middle (), constructive set theories often require some logical quantifiers in their axioms to be set bounded, motivated by results tied to impredicativity.
In mathematics and set theory, hereditarily finite sets are defined as finite sets whose elements are all hereditarily finite sets. In other words, the set itself is finite, and all of its elements are finite sets, recursively all the way down to the empty set. A recursive definition of well-founded hereditarily finite sets is as follows: Base case: The empty set is a hereditarily finite set. Recursion rule: If a1,...,ak are hereditarily finite, then so is {a1,...,ak}.
In mathematics, the axiom of regularity (also known as the axiom of foundation) is an axiom of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory that states that every non-empty set A contains an element that is disjoint from A. In first-order logic, the axiom reads: The axiom of regularity together with the axiom of pairing implies that no set is an element of itself, and that there is no infinite sequence (an) such that ai+1 is an element of ai for all i.
We present a combination technique based on mixed differences of both spatial approximations and quadrature formulae for the stochastic variables to solve efficiently a class of optimal control problems (OCPs) constrained by random partial differential equ ...
We present a combination technique based on mixed differences of both spatial approximations and quadrature formulae for the stochastic variables to solve efficiently a class of Optimal Control Problems (OCPs) constrained by random partial differential equ ...
EPFL2022
We prove that optimal traffic plans for the mailing problem in Rd are stable with respect to variations of the given coupling, above the critical exponent α=1−1/d, thus solving an open problem stated in the book Optimal transportation networks, by Bernot, ...