In mathematics, the Ab has the abelian groups as and group homomorphisms as morphisms. This is the prototype of an : indeed, every can be embedded in Ab.
The zero object of Ab is the trivial group {0} which consists only of its neutral element.
The monomorphisms in Ab are the injective group homomorphisms, the epimorphisms are the surjective group homomorphisms, and the isomorphisms are the bijective group homomorphisms.
Ab is a of Grp, the . The main difference between Ab and Grp is that the sum of two homomorphisms f and g between abelian groups is again a group homomorphism:
(f+g)(x+y) = f(x+y) + g(x+y) = f(x) + f(y) + g(x) + g(y)
= f(x) + g(x) + f(y) + g(y) = (f+g)(x) + (f+g)(y)
The third equality requires the group to be abelian. This addition of morphism turns Ab into a , and because the direct sum of finitely many abelian groups yields a biproduct, we indeed have an .
In Ab, the notion of coincides with kernel in the algebraic sense, i.e. the categorical kernel of the morphism f : A → B is the subgroup K of A defined by K = {x ∈ A : f(x) = 0}, together with the inclusion homomorphism i : K → A. The same is true for cokernels; the cokernel of f is the quotient group C = B / f(A) together with the natural projection p : B → C. (Note a further crucial difference between Ab and Grp: in Grp it can happen that f(A) is not a normal subgroup of B, and that therefore the quotient group B / f(A) cannot be formed.) With these concrete descriptions of kernels and cokernels, it is quite easy to check that Ab is indeed an .
The in Ab is given by the product of groups, formed by taking the cartesian product of the underlying sets and performing the group operation componentwise. Because Ab has kernels, one can then show that Ab is a . The coproduct in Ab is given by the direct sum; since Ab has cokernels, it follows that Ab is also cocomplete.
We have a forgetful functor Ab → which assigns to each abelian group the underlying set, and to each group homomorphism the underlying function. This functor is faithful, and therefore Ab is a .
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.
Après une introduction à la théorie des catégories, nous appliquerons la théorie générale au cas particulier des groupes, ce qui nous permettra de bien mettre en perspective des notions telles que quo
Algebraic K-theory, which to any ring R associates a sequence of groups, can be viewed as a theory of linear algebra over an arbitrary ring. We will study in detail the first two of these groups and a
Singular cohomology is defined by dualizing the singular chain complex for spaces. We will study its basic properties, see how it acquires a multiplicative structure and becomes a graded commutative a
In algebra, given a ring R, the category of left modules over R is the whose are all left modules over R and whose morphisms are all module homomorphisms between left R-modules. For example, when R is the ring of integers Z, it is the same thing as the . The category of right modules is defined in a similar way. One can also define the category of bimodules over a ring R but that category is equivalent to the category of left (or right) modules over the enveloping algebra of R (or over the opposite of that).
In mathematics, specifically , a subcategory of a C is a category S whose are objects in C and whose morphisms are morphisms in C with the same identities and composition of morphisms. Intuitively, a subcategory of C is a category obtained from C by "removing" some of its objects and arrows. Let C be a category. A subcategory S of C is given by a subcollection of objects of C, denoted ob(S), a subcollection of morphisms of C, denoted hom(S).
In , a branch of mathematics, the image of a morphism is a generalization of the of a function. Given a and a morphism in , the image of is a monomorphism satisfying the following universal property: There exists a morphism such that . For any object with a morphism and a monomorphism such that , there exists a unique morphism such that . Remarks: such a factorization does not necessarily exist. is unique by definition of monic. therefore by monic. is monic. already implies that is unique.
To do homological algebra with unbounded chain complexes one needs to first find a way of constructing resolutions. Spal-tenstein solved this problem for chain complexes of R-modules by truncating further and further to the left, resolving the pieces, and ...
In the first part of this paper, we propose a uniform interpretation of characteristic classes as obstructions to the reduction of the structure group and to the existence of an equivariant extension of a certain homomorphism defined a priori only on a sin ...
We investigate the theory of principal bundles from a homotopical point of view. In the first part of the thesis, we prove a classification of principal bundles over a fixed base space, dual to the well-known classification of bundles with a fixed structur ...