Advanced oxidation process | EPFL Graph Search

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), in a broad sense, are a set of chemical treatment procedures designed to remove organic (and sometimes inorganic) materials in water and wastewater by oxidation through reactions with hydroxyl radicals (·OH). In real-world applications of wastewater treatment, however, this term usually refers more specifically to a subset of such chemical processes that employ ozone (O3), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and/or UV light. Description AOPs rely on in-situ production of highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (·OH). These reactive species are the strongest oxidants that can be applied in water and can oxidize virtually any compound present in the water matrix, often at a diffusion-controlled reaction speed. Consequently, ·OH reacts unselectively once formed and contaminants will be quickly and efficiently fragmented and converted into small inorganic molecules. Hydroxyl radicals are produced with the help of one or more primary oxidants (e.g. ozone, hydr

Pretreatment options for micropollutant abatement before aquifer recharge in drinking water production: Assessment of UV/H2O2 and dense membranes

Robin Wünsch

Micropollutants (MP) such as residues of pharmaceuticals, industrial chemicals or pesticides can be detected in almost all water resources. Various processes can be used to abate them in drinking water treatment, e.g., ozonation, advanced oxidation processes (AOP), adsorption on activated carbon or membrane filtration. The selection of a suitable process combination is a complex task for water suppliers.This thesis compares two process chains in the context of a multi-barrier system including managed aquifer recharge (MAR). To protect soils and aquifers from MP in the future, an additional barrier against MP upstream of the MAR was investigated: (1) a full-stream treatment using the AOP UV/H2O2, and (2) a side-stream treatment with low-pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO) or nanofiltration (NF) and ozonation of the retentate to treat the concentrated MPs.Pilot-scale experiments were conducted to determine the relative abatements of MP by UV/H2O2 treatment and by a subsequent soil column treatment. Compared to a soil column fed with water without UV/H2O2 pretreatment, the performance of the combined process (UV/H2O2 + soil column) was more efficient. However, this could be explained by an additive effect of the individual processes.Relative abatements in the UV/H2O2 process are mainly based on the introduced UV fluence and hydroxyl radical exposure. These parameters could be calculated with a model based on the measured relative abatements of two MPs (probe compounds) and their kinetic data (second-order rate constants for the reactions with hydroxyl radical, absorbance and quantum yield).With this information, the relative abatements of other MPs could be predicted with an accuracy of ±20%. A sensitivity analysis of the model showed that the relative abatements of the selected probe compounds should be >50%. In this case, the accuracy of the calculated parameters depends mainly on the precision of the kinetic data.In the case of membrane-based treatment of water by LPRO or NF, a concentrate is produced. Ozonation to treat MP in the concentrate is accompanied by a formation of the possibly carcinogenic bromate by oxidation of bromide. To achieve the highest possible MP abatement with simultaneously low bromate formation, both membrane selection and subsequent concentrate ozonation were investigated. In laboratory tests with standardized concentrates, neither the water source nor the membrane type caused a change in bromate yield for similar relative MP abatements. However, NF membranes have lower relative retentions of bromide and MP than LPRO membranes, making NF concentrates more suitable for ozonation with limited bromate formation.A comparison of UV/H2O2 with membrane treatment showed that full-stream treatment with UV/H2O2 has about four times lower costs and an about five times lower environmental impact. In addition it achieves significantly higher disinfection. In contrast, side-stream treatment with LPRO causes up to two times lower impacts for the environment when the electrical energy source is wind or hydropower. This study thus contributes technical, economic, and environmental aspects to a holistic evaluation of the two process options.

EPFL2022

Piezoelectric materials for catalytic/photocatalytic removal of pollutants: Recent advances and outlook

Sami Rtimi

The accumulation of various contaminants in air, soil and water is threatening the natural environment. The remediation of the environmental contaminations is today an urge. Among the remediation methods employed, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are a class of techniques based on the in situ generation of highly reactive and oxidizing radical species which can destroy most of the organic pollutants. AOPs driven by light are found to be the most popular for wastewater treatment due to the abundance of solar light in some regions. The removal of organic contaminants using semiconductor-based photocatalysts has been extensively investigated. However, low charge carrier mobility and rapid electron-hole pair recombination are the common problems that limit the semiconductor-based photocatalysis. Although a large number of alternative systems have been investigated, electron-hole pair separation is still too low in photocatalytic systems. A new concept was introduced recently in which the built-in electric field by ferroelectric, pyroelectric and piezoelectric effects in photocatalytic particles was exploited to enhance the separation of photoinduced charge carriers. Among these new systems that are still under investigation, the use of piezoelectric materials in the photodegradation of pollutants recently drew a lot of attention for environmental remediation. Due to the non-centrosymmetric nature, the piezoelectric materials demonstrate unique catalytic properties as a result of the creation of the built-in electric field by the dipole polarization. This latter provides a driving force for the transport of the photoinduced charge carriers enabling their separation. This review covers the use of piezoelectric materials in photocatalysis and catalysis, especially piezoelectric-catalysis, for environmental remediation. The paper details the fundamentals and basic properties of ferroelectric, pyroelectric and piezoelectric materials. The effect of the built-in electric field in these materials on the photocatalysis/catalysis charge carrier separation is discussed. Possible applications of piezoelectric materials in environmental remediation are reviewed and discussed taking into account several different aspects such as the kinetics of the degradation of the organic pollutants and water splitting. Finally, the current research trends and future prospects of piezocatalysis and piezophotocatalysis are discussed.

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV2019