Estimating equations | EPFL Graph Search

In statistics, the method of estimating equations is a way of specifying how the parameters of a statistical model should be estimated. This can be thought of as a generalisation of many classical methods—the method of moments, least squares, and maximum likelihood—as well as some recent methods like M-estimators. The basis of the method is to have, or to find, a set of simultaneous equations involving both the sample data and the unknown model parameters which are to be solved in order to define the estimates of the parameters. Various components of the equations are defined in terms of the set of observed data on which the estimates are to be based. Important examples of estimating equations are the likelihood equations. Examples Consider the problem of estimating the rate parameter, λ of the exponential distribution which has the probability density function: : f(x;\lambda) = \left{\begin{matrix} \lambda e^{-\lambda x}, &; x \ge 0, \ 0, &; x < 0. \end

Les mathématiques financières robustes, le maritime et les FFA

Jérôme Reboulleau

Powerful mathematical tools have been developed for trading in stocks and bonds, but other markets that are equally important for the globalized world have to some extent been neglected. We decided to study the shipping market as an new area of development in mathematical finance. The market in shipping derivatives (FFA and FOSVA) has only been developed after 2000 and now exhibits impressive growth. Financial actors have entered the field, but it is still largely undiscovered by institutional investors. The first part of the work was to identify the characteristics of the market in shipping, i.e. the segmentation and the volatility. Because the shipping business is old-fashioned, even the leading actors on the world stage (ship owners and banks) are using macro-economic models to forecast the rates. If the macro-economic models are logical and make sense, they fail to predict. For example, the factor port congestion has been much cited during the last few years, but it is clearly very difficult to control and is simply an indicator of traffic. From our own experience it appears that most ship owners are in fact market driven and rather bad at anticipating trends. Due to their ability to capture large moves, we chose to consider Lévy processes for the underlying price process. Compared with the macro-economic approach, the main advantage is the uniform and systematic structure this imposed on the models. We get in each case a favorable result for our technology and a gain in forecasting accuracy of around 10% depending on the maturity. The global distribution is more effectively modelled and the tails of the distribution are particularly well represented. This model can be used to forecast the market but also to evaluate the risk, for example, by computing the VaR. An important limitation is the non-robustness in the estimation of the Lévy processes. The use of robust estimators reinforces the information obtained from the observed data. Because maximum likelihood estimation is not easy to compute with complex processes, we only consider some very general robust score functions to manage the technical problems. Two new class of robust estimators are suggested. These are based on the work of F. Hampel ([29]) and P. Huber ([30]) using influence functions. The main idea is to bound the maximum likelihood score function. By doing this a bias is created in the parameters estimation, which can be corrected by using a modification of the following type and as proposed by F. Hampel. The procedure for finding a robust estimating equation is thus decomposed into two consecutive steps : Subtract the bias correction and then Bound the score function. In the case of complex Lévy processes, the bias correction is difficult to compute and generally unknown. We have developed a pragmatic solution by inverting the Hampel's procedure. Bound the score function and then Correct for the bias. The price is a loss of the theoretical properties of our estimators, besides the procedure converges to maximum likelihood estimate. A second solution to for achieving robust estimation is presented. It considers the limiting case when the upper and lower bounds tend to zero and leads to B-robust estimators. Because of the complexity of the Lévy distributions, this leads to identification problems.

EPFL2008

Practical issues with modeling extreme Brazilian rainfall

Paulo Vitor Da Costa Pereira, Anthony Christopher Davison, Isolde Santos Previdelli

Accurately quantifying extreme rainfall is important for the design of hydraulic structures, for flood mapping and zoning and for disaster management. In order to produce maps of estimates of 25-year rainfall return levels in Brazil, we selected 893 shorter and 104 longer rainfall time series from the Agencia Nacional de Aguas (ANA), and applied the framework of extreme value theory. Care was needed to reduce the impact of poor data. Estimates of the shape parameter of the extreme-value model fitted to rainfall data are typically biased, so we discuss an empirical correction that takes into account not only the sample-size bias, but also a so-called penultimate approximation that we use to inform a Bayesian spatial latent variable model for the annual rainfall maxima. This model accounts for subtle patterns of spatial variation in the data and provides plausible return level estimates.

BRAZILIAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION2021

Robust Parameter Estimation for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process

Sonja Rieder

In this thesis, we treat robust estimation for the parameters of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, which are the mean, the variance, and the friction. We start by considering classical maximum likelihood estimation. For the simulation study, where we also investigate the choice of the time lag, we use the method of moment (MoM) estimator as initial estimator for the friction parameter of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). However, in several aspects the MLE is not robust. For robustification, we first derive elementary M-estimates by extending the method of M-estimation from Huber (1981). We use an intuitively robustified MoM estimate as initial estimate and compare by means of simulation the M-estimate with the MLE. This approach is, however, only ad-hoc since Huber’s minimum Fisher information and minimax asymptotic variance theory remains incomplete for simultaneous location and scale, and does not cover more general models (as for example the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process). A more general robustness concept due to Kohl et al. (2010), Rieder (1994), and Staab (1984) is based on local asymptotic normality (LAN), asymptotically linear (AL) estimates, and shrinking neighborhoods. We then apply this concept to the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. As a measure of robustness, we consider the maximum asymptotic mean square error (maxasyMSE), which is determined by the influence curve (IC) of AL estimates. The IC represents the standardized influence of an individual observation on the estimator given the past. For two kind of neighborhoods (average and average square neighborhoods) we obtain optimally robust ICs. In case of average neighborhoods, their graph exhibits surprising, redescending behavior. For average square neighborhoods the graph is between the one of the elementary M-estimates and the MLE. Finally, we discuss the estimator construction, that is, the problem of constructing an estimator from the family of optimal ICs. We carry out in our context the One-Step construction dating back to LeCam and use both an intuitively robustified MoM estimate and the elementary M-estimate as initial estimate. This results in optimally AL estimates (for average and average square neighborhoods). By means of simulation we then compare the different estimators: MLE, elementary M-estimates, and optimally AL estimates. In addition, we give an application to electricity prices.