Comparison of file systems

Comparison of operating systems

These tables provide a comparison of operating systems, of computer devices, as listing general and technical information for a number of widely used and currently available PC or handheld (including smartphone and tablet computer) operating systems. The article "Usage share of operating systems" provides a broader, and more general, comparison of operating systems that includes servers, mainframes and supercomputers.

Installable File System

The Installable File System (IFS) is a in MS-DOS/PC DOS 4.x, IBM OS/2 and Microsoft Windows that enables the operating system to recognize and load drivers for s. When IBM and Microsoft were co-developing OS/2, they realized that the did not offer some of the features modern OSes would require, and Microsoft began developing the (HPFS), codenamed Pinball. Instead of coding it inside the kernel, as FAT was, Microsoft developed a "driver-based" filesystem API that could allow them and other developers to add new filesystems to the kernel without needing to modify it.

The following tables compare general and technical information for a number of . Note that in addition to the below table, block capabilities can be implemented below the file system layer in Linux (LVM, , cryptsetup) or Windows (Volume Shadow Copy Service, SECURITY), etc. "online" and "offline" are synonymous with "mounted" and "not mounted". While storage devices usually have their size expressed in powers of 10 (for instance a 1 TB Solid State Drive will contain at least 1,000,000,000,000 (1012, 10004) bytes), filesystem limits are invariably powers of 2, so usually expressed with IEC prefixes.

The cost of omnidirectionality: extracting and labelling the echoes

The cost of omnidirectionality: extracting and labelling the echoes