Quasitransitive relation

The mathematical notion of quasitransitivity is a weakened version of transitivity that is used in social choice theory and microeconomics. Informally, a relation is quasitransitive if it is symmetric for some values and transitive elsewhere. The concept was introduced by to study the consequences of Arrow's theorem. A binary relation T over a set X is quasitransitive if for all a, b, and c in X the following holds: If the relation is also antisymmetric, T is transitive. Alternately, for a relation T, define the asymmetric or "strict" part P: Then T is quasitransitive if and only if P is transitive. Preferences are assumed to be quasitransitive (rather than transitive) in some economic contexts. The classic example is a person indifferent between 7 and 8 grams of sugar and indifferent between 8 and 9 grams of sugar, but who prefers 9 grams of sugar to 7. Similarly, the Sorites paradox can be resolved by weakening assumed transitivity of certain relations to quasitransitivity. A relation R is quasitransitive if, and only if, it is the disjoint union of a symmetric relation J and a transitive relation P. J and P are not uniquely determined by a given R; however, the P from the only-if part is minimal. As a consequence, each symmetric relation is quasitransitive, and so is each transitive relation. Moreover, an antisymmetric and quasitransitive relation is always transitive. The relation from the above sugar example, {(7,7), (7,8), (7,9), (8,7), (8,8), (8,9), (9,8), (9,9)}, is quasitransitive, but not transitive. A quasitransitive relation needn't be acyclic: for every non-empty set A, the universal relation A×A is both cyclic and quasitransitive. A relation is quasitransitive if, and only if, its complement is. Similarly, a relation is quasitransitive if, and only if, its converse is.