In quantum mechanics, the canonical commutation relation is the fundamental relation between canonical conjugate quantities (quantities which are related by definition such that one is the Fourier transform of another). For example, between the position operator x and momentum operator px in the x direction of a point particle in one dimension, where [x , px] = x px − px x is the commutator of x and px , i is the imaginary unit, and ħ is the reduced Planck's constant h/2π, and is the unit operator. In general, position and momentum are vectors of operators and their commutation relation between different components of position and momentum can be expressed as where is the Kronecker delta. This relation is attributed to Werner Heisenberg, Max Born and Pascual Jordan (1925), who called it a "quantum condition" serving as a postulate of the theory; it was noted by E. Kennard (1927) to imply the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The Stone–von Neumann theorem gives a uniqueness result for operators satisfying (an exponentiated form of) the canonical commutation relation. By contrast, in classical physics, all observables commute and the commutator would be zero. However, an analogous relation exists, which is obtained by replacing the commutator with the Poisson bracket multiplied by iħ, This observation led Dirac to propose that the quantum counterparts , ĝ of classical observables f, g satisfy In 1946, Hip Groenewold demonstrated that a general systematic correspondence between quantum commutators and Poisson brackets could not hold consistently. However, he further appreciated that such a systematic correspondence does, in fact, exist between the quantum commutator and a deformation of the Poisson bracket, today called the Moyal bracket, and, in general, quantum operators and classical observables and distributions in phase space. He thus finally elucidated the consistent correspondence mechanism, the Wigner–Weyl transform, that underlies an alternate equivalent mathematical representation of quantum mechanics known as deformation quantization.

About this result
This page is automatically generated and may contain information that is not correct, complete, up-to-date, or relevant to your search query. The same applies to every other page on this website. Please make sure to verify the information with EPFL's official sources.
Related courses (9)
PHYS-202: Analytical mechanics (for SPH)
Présentation des méthodes de la mécanique analytique (équations de Lagrange et de Hamilton) et introduction aux notions de modes normaux et de stabilité.
PHYS-207: Quantum mechanics I
The objective of this course is to familiarize the student with the concepts, methods and consequences of quantum physics.
PHYS-454: Quantum optics and quantum information
This lecture describes advanced concepts and applications of quantum optics. It emphasizes the connection with ongoing research, and with the fast growing field of quantum technologies. The topics cov
Show more
Related lectures (58)
Quantum Physics I
Explores discrete and continuous degrees of freedom, canonical commutation relations, and the correspondence between classical and quantum mechanics.
Quantum Physics I
Covers the fundamentals of quantum physics, including commutation relations and time evolution operators.
Quantum Field Theory: Heisenberg Representation and Noether Charges
Explores the Heisenberg representation of a free massive real scalar field and the time independence of Noether charges.
Show more
Related publications (46)

Improved calorimetric particle identification in NA62 using machine learning techniques

Alessandro Mapelli, Radoslav Marchevski, Alina Kleimenova

Measurement of the ultra-rare K+ -> pi(+)nu(nu) over bar over bar decay at the NA62 experiment at CERN requires high-performance particle identification to distinguish muons from pions. Calorimetric identification currently in use, based on a boosted decis ...
New York2023

Temporally-Coherent Surface Reconstruction via Metric-Consistent Atlases

Pascal Fua, Mathieu Salzmann, Shaifali Parashar, Jan Bednarík, Siddhartha Chaudhuri

We propose a method for the unsupervised reconstruction of a temporally-coherent sequence of surfaces from a sequence of time-evolving point clouds, yielding dense, semantically meaningful correspondences between all keyframes. We represent the reconstruct ...
2021

Implications of ANEC for SCFTs in four dimensions

Andrea Manenti, Alessandro Vichi

We explore consequences of the Averaged Null Energy Condition (ANEC) for scaling dimensions Delta of operators in four-dimensional N = 1 superconformal field theories. We show that in many cases the ANEC bounds are stronger than the corresponding unitarity ...
SPRINGER2020
Show more
Related concepts (24)
Spin (physics)
Spin is an intrinsic form of angular momentum carried by elementary particles, and thus by composite particles such as hadrons, atomic nuclei, and atoms. Spin should not be understood as in the "rotating internal mass" sense: spin is a quantized wave property. The existence of electron spin angular momentum is inferred from experiments, such as the Stern–Gerlach experiment, in which silver atoms were observed to possess two possible discrete angular momenta despite having no orbital angular momentum.
Heisenberg group
In mathematics, the Heisenberg group , named after Werner Heisenberg, is the group of 3×3 upper triangular matrices of the form under the operation of matrix multiplication. Elements a, b and c can be taken from any commutative ring with identity, often taken to be the ring of real numbers (resulting in the "continuous Heisenberg group") or the ring of integers (resulting in the "discrete Heisenberg group"). The continuous Heisenberg group arises in the description of one-dimensional quantum mechanical systems, especially in the context of the Stone–von Neumann theorem.
Correspondence principle
In physics, the correspondence principle states that the behavior of systems described by the theory of quantum mechanics (or by the old quantum theory) reproduces classical physics in the limit of large quantum numbers. In other words, it says that for large orbits and for large energies, quantum calculations must agree with classical calculations. The principle was formulated by Niels Bohr in 1920, though he had previously made use of it as early as 1913 in developing his model of the atom.
Show more

Graph Chatbot

Chat with Graph Search

Ask any question about EPFL courses, lectures, exercises, research, news, etc. or try the example questions below.

DISCLAIMER: The Graph Chatbot is not programmed to provide explicit or categorical answers to your questions. Rather, it transforms your questions into API requests that are distributed across the various IT services officially administered by EPFL. Its purpose is solely to collect and recommend relevant references to content that you can explore to help you answer your questions.