Bias of an estimator | EPFL Graph Search

In statistics, the bias of an estimator (or bias function) is the difference between this estimator's expected value and the true value of the parameter being estimated. An estimator or decision rule with zero bias is called unbiased. In statistics, "bias" is an property of an estimator. Bias is a distinct concept from consistency: consistent estimators converge in probability to the true value of the parameter, but may be biased or unbiased; see bias versus consistency for more. All else being equal, an unbiased estimator is preferable to a biased estimator, although in practice, biased estimators (with generally small bias) are frequently used. When a biased estimator is used, bounds of the bias are calculated. A biased estimator may be used for various reasons: because an unbiased estimator does not exist without further assumptions about a population; because an estimator is difficult to compute (as in unbiased estimation of standard deviation); because a biased estimator may b

Wavelet Density Estimators in Discriminant Analysis

Olivier Renaud

The purpose of discriminant analysis is to predict group membership of an individual on the basis of a set of measurements that have been made on it. In this goal, the availability of a learning sample, for which it is know where each individual came from, is assumed. In this context, the thresholded wavelet density estimator may capture more easily fine structures of group differences than usual linear density estimators (such as kernel-based methods). This does not apply ``as is'' in high dimensional space. However, in the univariate case, the estimator behaves well, and can, therefore, be used in the framework of Projection Pursuit Discriminant Analysis, a method that searches for the one-dimension projection that best separates the groups.

1996

Robust parameter estimation for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

Sonja Rieder

In this paper, we derive elementary M- and optimally robust asymptotic linear (AL)-estimates for the parameters of an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Simulation and estimation of the process are already well-studied, see Iacus (Simulation and inference for stochastic differential equations. Springer, New York, 2008). However, in order to protect against outliers and deviations from the ideal law the formulation of suitable neighborhood models and a corresponding robustification of the estimators are necessary. As a measure of robustness, we consider the maximum asymptotic mean square error (maxasyMSE), which is determined by the influence curve (IC) of AL estimates. The IC represents the standardized influence of an individual observation on the estimator given the past. In a first step, we extend the method of M-estimation from Huber (Robust statistics. Wiley, New York, 1981). In a second step, we apply the general theory based on local asymptotic normality, AL estimates, and shrinking neighborhoods due to Kohl et al. (Stat Methods Appl 19:333-354, 2010), Rieder (Robust asymptotic statistics. Springer, New York, 1994), Rieder (2003), and Staab (1984). This leads to optimally robust ICs whose graph exhibits surprising behavior. In the end, we discuss the estimator construction, i.e. the problem of constructing an estimator from the family of optimal ICs. Therefore we carry out in our context the One-Step construction dating back to LeCam (Asymptotic methods in statistical decision theory. Springer, New York, 1969) and compare it by means of simulations with MLE and M-estimator.

Springer-Verlag2012

Robust Parameter Estimation for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process

Sonja Rieder

In this thesis, we treat robust estimation for the parameters of the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, which are the mean, the variance, and the friction. We start by considering classical maximum likelihood estimation. For the simulation study, where we also investigate the choice of the time lag, we use the method of moment (MoM) estimator as initial estimator for the friction parameter of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). However, in several aspects the MLE is not robust. For robustification, we first derive elementary M-estimates by extending the method of M-estimation from Huber (1981). We use an intuitively robustified MoM estimate as initial estimate and compare by means of simulation the M-estimate with the MLE. This approach is, however, only ad-hoc since Huber’s minimum Fisher information and minimax asymptotic variance theory remains incomplete for simultaneous location and scale, and does not cover more general models (as for example the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process). A more general robustness concept due to Kohl et al. (2010), Rieder (1994), and Staab (1984) is based on local asymptotic normality (LAN), asymptotically linear (AL) estimates, and shrinking neighborhoods. We then apply this concept to the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. As a measure of robustness, we consider the maximum asymptotic mean square error (maxasyMSE), which is determined by the influence curve (IC) of AL estimates. The IC represents the standardized influence of an individual observation on the estimator given the past. For two kind of neighborhoods (average and average square neighborhoods) we obtain optimally robust ICs. In case of average neighborhoods, their graph exhibits surprising, redescending behavior. For average square neighborhoods the graph is between the one of the elementary M-estimates and the MLE. Finally, we discuss the estimator construction, that is, the problem of constructing an estimator from the family of optimal ICs. We carry out in our context the One-Step construction dating back to LeCam and use both an intuitively robustified MoM estimate and the elementary M-estimate as initial estimate. This results in optimally AL estimates (for average and average square neighborhoods). By means of simulation we then compare the different estimators: MLE, elementary M-estimates, and optimally AL estimates. In addition, we give an application to electricity prices.

EPFL2012

Robust Parameter Estimation for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process

Sonja Rieder

EPFL2012