Kitzmiller v. Dover Area SchoolLe jugement Tammy Kitzmiller, et als v. Dover Area School District, et als (No. 04cv2688), est le premier dans une cour fédérale des États-Unis à condamner une école publique de district qui tentait d'obliger l'enseignement en classe de sciences de la pseudo-théorie du dessein intelligent comme une alternative scientifique à la théorie darwinienne largement établie.
Theistic scienceTheistic science, also referred to as theistic realism, is the pseudoscientific proposal that the central scientific method of requiring testability, known as methodological naturalism, should be replaced by a philosophy of science that allows occasional supernatural explanations which are inherently untestable. Proponents propose supernatural explanations for topics raised by their theology, in particular evolution. Supporters of theistic realism or theistic science include intelligent design creationism proponents J.
Intelligent design in politicsThe intelligent design movement has conducted an organized campaign largely in the United States that promotes a pseudoscientific, neo-creationist religious agenda calling for broad social, academic and political changes centering on intelligent design. Level of support for evolution Though creationism and intelligent design are not supported by many mainstream scientists, there are significant minorities in the general public in most developed countries that say they doubt or reject the theory of evolution, likely because of their religious beliefs.
Dénialismevignette|Pancarte de protestation contre le déni du réchauffement climatique avec écrit : « Les faits niés restent des faits ». En psychologie comportementale, le dénialisme (denialism) est le choix de nier un fait ou un consensus, sans justification rationnelle. ; mais le terme de « déni » est plus souvent employé, par abus de langage et par anglicisme. C'est parfois un moyen mis en place afin d'éviter une vérité psychologiquement inconfortable.
Truth in ScienceTruth in Science is a United Kingdom-based creationist organisation which promotes the Discovery Institute's "Teach the Controversy" campaign, which it uses to try to get the pseudoscientific concept of intelligent design creationism taught alongside evolution in school science lessons. The organisation claims that there is scientific controversy about the validity of Darwinian evolution, a view rejected by the United Kingdom's Royal Society and over 50 Academies of Science around the world.
Sternberg peer review controversyThe Sternberg peer review controversy concerns the conflict arising from the publication of an article supporting pseudoscientific intelligent design creationism in a scientific journal, and the subsequent questions of whether proper editorial procedures had been followed and whether it was properly peer reviewed. One of the primary criticisms of the intelligent design movement is that there are no research papers supporting their positions in peer reviewed scientific journals. On 4 August 2004, an article by Stephen C.
