In traditional logic, obversion is a "type of immediate inference in which from a given proposition another proposition is inferred whose subject is the same as the original subject, whose predicate is the contradictory of the original predicate, and whose quality is affirmative if the original proposition's quality was negative and vice versa". The quality of the inferred categorical proposition is changed but the truth value is the same to the original proposition. The immediately inferred proposition is termed the "obverse" of the original proposition, and is a valid form of inference for all types (A, E, I, O) of categorical propositions.
In a universal affirmative and a universal negative proposition the subject term and the predicate term are both replaced by their negated counterparts:
The universal affirmative ("A" proposition) is obverted to a universal negative ("E" proposition).
"All S are P" and "No S are non-P"
"All cats are animals" and "No cats are non-animals"
The universal negative ("E" proposition) is obverted to a universal affirmative ("A" proposition).
"No S are P" and "All S are non-P"
"No cats are friendly" and "All cats are non-friendly"
In the particular affirmative the quantity of the subject term remains unchanged, but the predicate term of the inferred proposition negates the complement of the predicate term of the original proposition. The particular affirmative ("I" proposition) is obverted to a particular negative ("O" proposition).
"Some S are P" and "Some S are not non-P"
"Some animals are friendly creatures" and "Some animals are not unfriendly creatures."
In the obversion of a particular negative to a particular affirmative the quantity of the subject also remains unchanged, and the predicate term is changed from simple negation to a term of the complementary class. The particular negative ("O") proposition is obverted to a particular affirmative ("I" proposition).
"Some S are not P" and "Some S are non-P"
"Some animals are not friendly creatures" and "Some animals are unfriendly creatures.
Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.
In logic, a categorical proposition, or categorical statement, is a proposition that asserts or denies that all or some of the members of one category (the subject term) are included in another (the predicate term). The study of arguments using categorical statements (i.e., syllogisms) forms an important branch of deductive reasoning that began with the Ancient Greeks. The Ancient Greeks such as Aristotle identified four primary distinct types of categorical proposition and gave them standard forms (now often called A, E, I, and O).
Le carré logique ci contre représente les oppositions logiques entre les quatre propositions : Proposition notée A, universelle affirmative : « tous les S sont P » (SaP : S are all P) Proposition notée E, universelle négative : « aucun S n'est P » ou « tous les S sont non-P » (SeP : S excluded from P) Proposition notée I, particulière affirmative : « au moins un S est P » (SiP : some S in P). Proposition notée O, particulière négative : « au moins un S est non-P » (SoP : some S out of P), qui exprime la précédente négativement.
En mathématiques, plus précisément en calcul propositionnel, une implication réciproque est une proposition interchangeant la prémisse et la conclusion d'une implication. La réciproque de la réciproque est alors l'implication initiale. Lorsque l'implication comporte plusieurs prémisses, l'échange de la conclusion avec seulement une partie des prémisses est parfois aussi appelée réciproque, comme pour le théorème de Thalès où les conditions d'alignement restent en prémisse pour la réciproque.