Ensemble de SmithDans les systèmes de vote, l'ensemble de Smith, nommé d'après John H. Smith, mais également connu sous le nom de cycle supérieur, ou comme GETCHA (Generalized Top-Choice Assumption en anglais), est le plus petit ensemble non vide de candidats dans une élection particulière de telle sorte que chaque membre bat chaque candidat en dehors de l'ensemble lors d'une élection par paires. L'ensemble de Smith fournit une norme de choix optimal pour un résultat électoral.
Nicolas de CondorcetMarie Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat, marquis de Condorcet, né le 17 septembre 1743 à Ribemont et mort le 29 mars 1794 à Bourg de l'Égalité, est un mathématicien, philosophe, homme politique et éditeur français, représentant des Lumières. Il est célèbre pour ses travaux pionniers sur la statistique et les probabilités, son analyse des modes de scrutin ainsi que par ses écrits philosophiques et son action politique, tant avant la Révolution que sous celle-ci.
Nanson's methodThe Borda count electoral system can be combined with an instant-runoff procedure to create hybrid election methods that are called Nanson method and Baldwin method (also called Total Vote Runoff or TVR). Both methods are designed to satisfy the Condorcet criterion, and allow for incomplete ballots and equal rankings. The Nanson method is based on the original work of the mathematician Edward J. Nanson in 1882.
Smith criterionThe Smith criterion (sometimes generalized Condorcet criterion, but this can have other meanings) is a voting systems criterion defined such that it's satisfied when a voting system always elects a candidate that is in the Smith set, which is the smallest non-empty subset of the candidates such that every candidate in the subset is majority-preferred over every candidate not in the subset. (A candidate X is said to be majority-preferred over another candidate Y if, in a one-on-one competition between X & Y, the number of voters who prefer X over Y exceeds the number of voters who prefer Y over X.
Comparison of electoral systemsComparison of electoral systems is the result of comparative politics for electoral systems. Electoral systems are the rules for conducting elections, a main component of which is the algorithm for determining the winner (or several winners) from the ballots cast. This article discusses methods and results of comparing different electoral systems, both those that elect a unique candidate in a 'single-winner' election and those that elect a group of representatives in a multiwinner election.
Score votingScore voting or range voting is an electoral system for single-seat elections, in which voters give each candidate a score, the scores are added (or averaged), and the candidate with the highest total is elected. It has been described by various other names including evaluative voting, utilitarian voting, interval measure voting, the point system, ratings summation, 0-99 voting, average voting and utility voting. It is a type of cardinal voting electoral system, and aims to implement the utilitarian social choice rule.
