Résumé
Cronbach's alpha (Cronbach's ), also known as rho-equivalent reliability () or coefficient alpha (coefficient ), is a reliability coefficient and a measure of the internal consistency of tests and measures. Numerous studies warn against using it unconditionally. Reliability coefficients based on structural equation modeling (SEM) or generalizability theory are superior alternatives in many situations. Lee Cronbach first named the coefficient in 1951 with his initial publication, Cronbach's alpha. The publication also conceived an additional method to derive it, after implicit use in previous studies. His interpretation of the coefficient was thought to be more intuitively attractive compared to those of previous studies. This made them quite popular. In 1967, Melvin Novick and Charles Lewis proved that is equal to reliability if the true scores of the compared tests or measures vary by a constant, which is independent of the persons measured. In this case, the tests or measurements are said to be "essentially tau-equivalent". In 1978, Cronbach asserted that the reason his initial 1951 publication was widely cited was "mostly because [he] put a brand name on a common-place coefficient." He explained that he had originally planned to name other types of reliability coefficients, such as those used in inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability, after consecutive Greek letters (i.e., , , etc.), but later changed his mind. Later, in 2004, Cronbach and Richard Shavelson encouraged readers to use generalizability theory rather than . Cronbach opposed the use of the name "Cronbach's alpha" and explicitly denied the existence of studies that had published the general formula of KR-20 prior to Cronbach's 1951 publication of the same name. In order to use Cronbach's alpha as a reliability coefficient, the following conditions must be met: The data is normally distributed and linear; The compared tests or measures are essentially tau-equivalent; Errors in the measurements are independent.
À propos de ce résultat
Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.
Publications associées (15)
Concepts associés (3)
Fidélité (psychométrie)
En psychométrie, la fidélité d'un test psychologique, ou fiabilité d'un test (reliability en anglais), est une des trois grandes mesures de la qualité du test (les deux autres étant la sensibilité et la validité). Cette mesure est prise lors d'une procédure de standardisation d'un test. Avant sa publication, un test psychologique est généralement évalué sur de larges échantillons de la population. Les résultats de cette procédure sont évalués : si le test obtient de bons indices de fidélité et de validité, il est considéré comme suffisamment robuste pour être publié et utilisé.
Item response theory
In psychometrics, item response theory (IRT) (also known as latent trait theory, strong true score theory, or modern mental test theory) is a paradigm for the design, analysis, and scoring of tests, questionnaires, and similar instruments measuring abilities, attitudes, or other variables. It is a theory of testing based on the relationship between individuals' performances on a test item and the test takers' levels of performance on an overall measure of the ability that item was designed to measure.
Psychométrie
La psychométrie est la science qui étudie l'ensemble des techniques de mesures pratiquées en psychologie, ainsi que les techniques de validation et d'élaboration de ces mesures. Ces techniques concernent tous les champs de la psychologie, ainsi que d'autres domaines de sciences connexes (comme la recherche en comportement du consommateur par exemple).