Robert Oppenheimer | EPFL Graph Search

Julius Robert Oppenheimer, généralement appelé Robert Oppenheimer voire J. Robert Oppenheimer, est un physicien américain, né le à New York et mort le à Princeton (New Jersey). Il s'est distingué en physique théorique puis comme directeur scientifique du Projet Manhattan. À cause de son rôle éminent, il est régulièrement surnommé le « père de la bombe atomique ». Opposé au développement d'armes thermonucléaires, il est discrédité par le gouvernement américain dans les à l'époque du maccarthysme. Réhabilité dans les années 1960, il termine brillamment sa carrière universitaire. Élevé dans une famille fortunée, intellectuelle et libérale, il maîtrise l'allemand, l'anglais et le français au point qu'il peut lire les ouvrages des plus grands chimistes, mathématiciens et physiciens de l'époque dans leur langue d'expression. Profitant des enseignements des meilleurs physiciens européens, il publie des articles importants en mécanique quantique, en physique des particules et en physique n

i-PI 2.0: A universal force engine for advanced molecular simulations

Sébastien Pierre Bienvenue, Michele Ceriotti, Bingqing Cheng, Alice Cuzzocrea, Benjamin Aaron Helfrecht, Przemyslaw Juda, Venkat Kapil, Robert Horst Meissner, Riccardo Petraglia, Mariana Rossi Carvalho, Gareth Aneurin Tribello, David Mark Wilkins

Progress in the atomic-scale modeling of matter over the past decade has been tremendous. This progress has been brought about by improvements in methods for evaluating interatomic forces that work by either solving the electronic structure problem explicitly, or by computing accurate approximations of the solution and by the development of techniques that use the Born-Oppenheimer (BO) forces to move the atoms on the BO potential energy surface. As a consequence of these developments it is now possible to identify stable or metastable states, to sample configurations consistent with the appropriate thermodynamic ensemble, and to estimate the kinetics of reactions and phase transitions. All too often, however, progress is slowed down by the bottleneck associated with implementing new optimization algorithms and/or sampling techniques into the many existing electronic-structure and empirical-potential codes. To address this problem, we are thus releasing a new version of the i-PI software. This piece of software is an easily extensible framework for implementing advanced atomistic simulation techniques using interatomic potentials and forces calculated by an external driver code. While the original version of the code (Ceriotti et al., 2014) was developed with a focus on path integral molecular dynamics techniques, this second release of i-PI not only includes several new advanced path integral methods, but also offers other classes of algorithms. In other words, i-PI is moving towards becoming a universal force engine that is both modular and tightly coupled to the driver codes that evaluate the potential energy surface and its derivatives. Program summary Program Title: i-PI Program Files doi: http://dx.doLorg/10.17632/x792grbm9g.1 Licensing provisions: GPLv3, MIT Programming language: Python External routines/libraries: NumPy Nature of problem: Lowering the implementation barrier to bring state-of-the-art sampling and atomistic modeling techniques to ab initio and empirical potentials programs. Solution method: Advanced sampling methods, including path-integral molecular dynamics techniques, are implemented in a Python interface. Any electronic structure code can be patched to receive the atomic coordinates from the Python interface, and to return the forces and energy that are used to integrate the equations of motion, optimize atomic geometries, etc. Restrictions: This code does not compute interatomic potentials, although the distribution includes sample driver codes that can be used to test different techniques using a few simple model force fields. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV2019

Communications: Evaluation of the nondiabaticity of quantum molecular dynamics with the dephasing representation of quantum fidelity

Jiri Vanicek, Tomas Zimmermann

We propose an approximate method for evaluating the importance of non-Born–Oppenheimer effects on the quantum dynamics of nuclei. The method uses a generalization of the dephasing representation (DR) of quantum fidelity to several diabatic potential energy surfaces and its computational cost is the cost of dynamics of a classical phase space distribution. It can be implemented easily into any molecular dynamics program and also can utilize on-the-fly ab initio electronic structure information. We test the methodology on three model problems introduced by Tully and on the photodissociation of NaI. The results show that for dynamics close to the diabatic limit, the decay of fidelity due to nondiabatic effects is described accurately by the DR. In this regime, unlike the mixed quantum-classical methods such as surface hopping or Ehrenfest dynamics, the DR can capture more subtle quantum effects than the population transfer between potential energy surfaces. Hence we propose using the DR to estimate the dynamical importance of diabatic, spin-orbit, or other couplings between potential energy surfaces. The acquired information can help reduce the complexity of a studied system without affecting the accuracy of the quantum simulation.

American Institute of Physics2010

Measuring nonadiabaticity of molecular quantum dynamics with quantum fidelity and with its efficient semiclassical approximation

Jiri Vanicek, Tomas Zimmermann

We propose to measure nonadiabaticity of molecular quantum dynamics rigorously with the quantum fidelity between the Born-Oppenheimer and fully nonadiabatic dynamics. It is shown that this measure of nonadiabaticity applies in situations where other criteria, such as the energy gap criterion or the extent of population transfer, fail. We further propose to estimate this quantum fidelity efficiently with a generalization of the dephasing representation to multiple surfaces. Two variants of the multiple-surface dephasing representation (MSDR) are introduced, in which the nuclei are propagated either with the fewest-switches surface hopping or with the locally mean field dynamics (LMFD). The LMFD can be interpreted as the Ehrenfest dynamics of an ensemble of nuclear trajectories, and has been used previously in the nonadiabatic semiclassical initial value representation. In addition to propagating an ensemble of classical trajectories, the MSDR requires evaluating nonadiabatic couplings and solving the Schrödinger (or more generally, the quantum Liouville-von Neumann) equation for a single discrete degree of freedom. The MSDR can be also used in the diabatic basis to measure the importance of the diabatic couplings. The method is tested on three model problems introduced by Tully and on a two-surface model of dissociation of NaI.

American Institute of Physics2012

i-PI 2.0: A universal force engine for advanced molecular simulations

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV2019