ChIPnorm: a statistical method for normalizing and identifying differential regions in histone modification ChIP-seq libraries

Philipp Bucher, Bernard Moret, Nishanth Ulhas Nair
Public Library of Science, 2012
Article

Résumé

The advent of high-throughput technologies such as ChIP-seq has made possible the study of histone modifications. A problem of particular interest is the identification of regions of the genome where different cell types from the same organism exhibit different patterns of histone enrichment. This problem turns out to be surprisingly difficult, even in simple pairwise comparisons, because of the significant level of noise in ChIP-seq data. In this paper we propose a two-stage statistical method, called ChIPnorm, to normalize ChIP-seq data, and to find differential regions in the genome, given two libraries of histone modifications of different cell types. We show that the ChIPnorm method removes most of the noise and bias in the data and outperforms other normalization methods. We correlate the histone marks with gene expression data and confirm that histone modifications H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 act as respectively a repressor and an activator of genes. Compared to what was previously reported in the literature, we find that a substantially higher fraction of bivalent marks in ES cells for H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 move into a K27-only state. We find that most of the promoter regions in protein-coding genes have differential histone-modification sites. The software for this work can be downloaded from http://lcbb.epfl.ch/software.html.

Official source

https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/183820?ln=fr

À propos de ce résultat

Cette page est générée automatiquement et peut contenir des informations qui ne sont pas correctes, complètes, à jour ou pertinentes par rapport à votre recherche. Il en va de même pour toutes les autres pages de ce site. Veillez à vérifier les informations auprès des sources officielles de l'EPFL.

Concepts associés

Chargement

Publications associées

Chargement

Toward a mechanistic understanding of variable chromatin modules

Gerard Llimos Aubach

Our genome is a long sequence of DNA that contains all the information to be able to constitute a living organism like us, similarly to what the letters in a book do to create a story. This sequence, which is a stretch of molecules called nucleotides, is almost identical between organisms of the same species (>99.9% in humans), however it varies in a small percentage due to some nucleotides being different at specific positions of the genome. This variation in the DNA will therefore influence our traits and affect our susceptibility to a certain condition. Thus, their study is highly relevant in genetics and biomedicine since they allow not only to predict the predisposition to a disease, such as cancer, but also to understand the molecular and cellular mechanism behind a certain phenotype. The effect of a genetic variant on a phenotype is given by their capacity to modulate the expression of a gene, either by directly impacting its sequence and thus changing the protein, or by regulating its expression levels. Interestingly, more than 88% of the disease-associated genetic variants present in humans are located outside genes, on the so-called non-coding part of the genome. This poses a challenge to identify what gene the genetic variant affects and to understand how it does so. Genetic variants do not only influence gene expression but they also affect the epigenetics state of the DNA (i.e. DNA methylation, histone marks, transcription factor (TF) binding...) and its 3D conformation, consequently modifying the activity of gene regulatory elements like promoters and enhancers. Previously, it has been shown that some of these regulatory regions located in the same locus exhibit a high level of molecular coordination and interindividual variation, mostly affected by genetic variation or environmental effects. These regions were termed variable chromatin modules (VCMs) or cis-regulatory domains (CRDs) and are thought to be the manifestation of fine-grained regulatory units of the genome. Understanding how a VCM is formed and the molecular basis behind the cooperativity between regulatory elements is an outstanding question in the field. In this work, we aim at resolving part of this puzzle by mechanistically dissecting one VCM that is influenced by a non-coding germline variant in B cells. Using a set of tools such as genetic engineering, TF binding assays and chromosome conformation studies, we demonstrate that this variant creates a de novo binding site for the TF MEF2, which acts as a pioneering factor for dozens of other collaborating TFs. In turn, this actuates a cluster of enhancers spanning a region over 150 kilobases (kb) that regulates AXIN2 gene expression, and is associated with a global compaction of the chromatin. In addition, in line with the known tumor-suppressor properties of AXIN2, we found that this variant influences chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) progression and predisposition. Together, the characterization of the AXIN2 VCM provides an unique example to the community of how a germline variant is able to switch on an entire genomic locus with high degree of cooperativity between regulatory elements, since it captures both the formation and transition behavior of a VCM. Furthermore, given the link with CLL, this focal variant could have translational potential by serving as a patient-stratifying or treatment diagnostic.

EPFL2021

Chargement

Rhythmic and clock-dependent chromatin loops regulate circadian gene expression

Jérôme Mermet

In mammals the circadian clock drives daily behavioural and physiological changes that resonate with environmental cues, which can be observed, for example, in the intricate timing of rest during the night and activity during the day in humans. The circadian clock consists of a network of hierarchical clocks in which the central pacemaker is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, which is sensitive to external light and propagates time to the peripheral organ-based clocks. Within organs, clocks tick in each individual cell and are molecularly encoded in the genome as a network of dynamic feedback loops. By mediating the expression of the appropriate gene products at the correct moment of the day, the molecular clocks op-timize physiological functions of virtually every cell in our body, allowing us to synchronize with daily fluc-tuations in the environment. In mammalian cells the chromatin organization in the nucleus consists of a topological network, in which chromatin interactions between distal regulatory elements such as enhancers and target genes are essen-tial to regulate gene expression. Important questions remain: is the complex chromatin folding dynamic and if so on which genomic and temporal scales? In fact, dynamic rearrangements of the chromatin have been reported on multiple genomic and time scales, from the entire genome to enhancer-promoter con-tacts, across developmental transitions, cellular differentiation, and transcription cycles. With this per-spective in mind, the circadian oscillator provides a unique model to study the dynamics of genomic inter-actions in the context of fluctuating transcription. Here, we explored chromatin contacts of core-clock and clock-controlled gene promoters in the mouse. We aimed at evaluating the putative dynamics of chromatin contacts, at estimating their conservation across tissues, and at exploring the contribution of the circadian clock to this interaction network. To achieve this goal, we performed 4C-sequencing assays at two circadian time points in the liver and kidney of WT and clock-deficient animals. Overall, we observe that chromatin contacts are largely conserved across circadian time points and genetic backgrounds, and are tissue-specific. Our experiments reveal that the promoters of core-clock and clock-controlled genes contact distal genomic regions containing en-hancer chromatin signatures, suggesting a functional role of these distal sites in target gene regulation. Our data also suggest a clock-driven module of rhythmic genes that are colocalized in the nucleus. However, we also observe dynamic contacts between oscillating gene promoter and enhancer-like ge-nomic regions. In this thesis, we discuss in detail two examples of dynamic chromatin looping that are ob-served at the Cry1 and Gys2 loci. Our data reveal not only a dynamic coupling between the chromatin loop and the transcriptional state but also that the dynamic of chromatin looping depends on a functional clock. Furthermore, genome editing experiments using CRISPR-Cas9 tools reveal that the Cry1 distal site is essential for the transcriptional regulation of Cry1 and contributes to the circadian clock robustness both in-vivo and in cultured cells. These results demonstrate how local chromatin rearrangements take place in a 24-hour time-scale and set chromatin looping between gene promoters and distal regions as a new reg-ulatory layer for circadian gene expression.

EPFL2017

Chargement

Any living organism contains a whole set of instructions encoded as genes on the DNA. This set of instructions contains all the necessary information that the organism will ever need, from its development to a mature individual to environment specific responses. Since all these instructions are not needed at the same time, the gene expression needs to be regulated. Eukaryotic genomes are stored inside nuclei as chromatin. The chromatin is the association of DNA with dedicated storage proteins - the histones - and the necessary machinery to regulate and express genes (RNA polymerases or RNAPs). In the nuclei, histones are assembled into octamers around which are wrapped ~148bp of DNA. This structure is known as the nucleosome. The repetition of nucleosomes along the genome allows to drastically compact the genome, eventually allowing to fit it inside the nucleus. However, this comes at the cost of rendering the DNA sequence inaccessible to DNA readers, such as the RNAPs and transcription factors (TFs). TFs are a class of proteins that have the remarkable property of recognizing and binding specific DNA sequences. More striking, each TF can recognize a multitude of different - but similar - DNA sequences providing TFs with a wide sequence specificity range. Eventually, this allows the cell to recruit TFs at dedicated locations in the genome called regulatory elements (REs). The action of TFs at REs is crucial to gene expression. Indeed, TFs are involved in many processes such as the opening of the chromatin structure or the recruitment of RNAPs. However if TFs can influence the chromatin structure, the opposite is also true as histones impede TF binding on DNA. Thus the regulation of genes relies on a subtle and complex crosstalk between the chromatin and TFs. To better understand how TFs and chromatin interact together to regulate gene expression, I lead several projects prospecting TF binding specificity and the chromatin structure at REs in human. First, I used ENCODE next generation sequencing (NGS) data to explore how TF binding influences the nearby nucleosome organization and the propensity of some TFs to bind together. The results suggest that regular nucleosome arrays are found near all TFs. They also point out two special cases. When CTCF binds with the cohesin complex, it seems to drive the nucleosome organization, which is a unique feature among all TFs investigated. Additionally I present evidence supporting that EBF1 is a pioneer factor - a special class of TFs able to bind nucleosome. Secondly, I developed several clustering algorithms and software to partition genomic regions according to NGS data and/or on their DNA sequences. These methods allow to discover important trends, for instance different nucleosome architectures . I illustrated the usefulness of these methods for the study of chromatin accessibility data and the identification of REs. Thirdly, I participated to the assessment of SMiLE-seq, a new microfluidic device that generates TF specificity data. The creation of TF specificity models and their comparison with other publicly available models demonstrated the value of SMiLE-seq to study TF specificity. Finally, I participated in the development of a software that predicts TF binding sites. A careful benchmarking suggested that this software is - at the time of writing - the best available software in terms of speed while showing other performances similar to its competitors.

EPFL2020

Chargement

Toward a mechanistic understanding of variable chromatin modules

Gerard Llimos Aubach

EPFL2021

Rhythmic and clock-dependent chromatin loops regulate circadian gene expression

Jérôme Mermet

EPFL2017

EPFL2020