Micropollutant degradation, bacterial inactivation and regrowth risk in wastewater effluents: Influence of the secondary (pre)treatment on the efficiency of Advanced Oxidation Processes

In this work, disinfection by 5 Advanced Oxidation Processes was preceded by 3 different secondary treatment systems present in the wastewater treatment plant of Vidy, Lausanne (Switzerland). 5 AOPs after two biological treatment methods (conventional activated sludge and moving bed bioreactor) and a physiochemical process (coagulation-flocculation) were tested in laboratory scale. The dependence among AOPs efficiency and secondary (pre)treatment was estimated by following the bacterial con- centration i) before secondary treatment, ii) after the different secondary treatment methods and iii) after the various AOPs. Disinfection and post-treatment bacterial regrowth were the evaluation in- dicators. The order of efficiency was Moving Bed Bioreactor > Activated Sludge > Coagulation- Flocculation > Primary Treatment. As far as the different AOPs are concerned, the disinfection kinetics were: UVC/H2O2 > UVC and solar photo-Fenton > Fenton or solar light. The contextualization and parallel study of microorganisms with the micropollutants of the effluents revealed that higher exposure times were necessary for complete degradation compared to microorganisms for the UV-based processes and inversed for the Fenton-related ones. Nevertheless, in the Fenton-related systems, the nominal 80% removal of micropollutants deriving from the Swiss legislation, often took place before the elimination of bacterial regrowth risk.

Effect of advanced oxidation processes on the micropollutants and the effluent organic matter contained in municipal wastewater previously treated by three different secondary methods

Luiz Felippe De Alencastro, Franco Alejandro Gamarra Vives, Stefanos Giannakis, Dominique Grandjean, Anoys Magnet, César Pulgarin

In this study, wastewater from the output of three different secondary treatment facilities (Activated Sludge, Moving Bed Bioreactor and Coagulation-Flocculation) present in the municipal wastewater treatment plant of Vidy, Lausanne (Switzerland), was further treated with various oxidation processes (UV, UV/H2O2, solar irradiation, Fenton, solar photo-Fenton), at laboratory scale. For this assessment, 6 organic micropollutants in agreement with the new environmental legislation requirements in Switzerland were selected (Carbamazepine, Clarithromycin, Diclofenac, Metoprolol, Benzotriazole, Mecoprop) and monitored throughout the treatment. Also, the overall removal of the organic load was assessed. After each secondary treatment, the efficiency of the AOPs increased in the following order: Coagulation-Flocculation < Activated Sludge < Moving Bed Bioreactor, in almost all cases. From the different combinations tested, municipal wastewater subjected to biological treatment followed by UV/ H2O2 resulted in the highest elimination levels. Wastewater previously treated by physicochemical treatment demonstrated considerably inhibited micropollutant degradation rates. The degradation kinetics were determined, yielding: k (UV) < k (UV/H2O2) and k (Fenton) < k (solar irradiation) < k (photo-Fenton). Finally, the evolution of global pollution parameters (COD & TOC elimination) was followed and the degradation pathways for the effluent organic matter are discussed.

Elsevier2015

Epuration des eaux usées par lagunage à microphytes et à macrophytes en Afrique de l'Ouest et du Centre

Doulaye Koné

Stabilization ponds and water lettuce-based systems in West and Central Africa - State of the art, removal performances and design criteria Despite several projects undertaken so far, sanitation remains a huge challenge in West and Central Africa. Big cities are growing without sustainable solution for sanitation planning. Sewage systems and wastewater treatment plants are underdeveloped or absent. Stabilization ponds have been introduced 30 years ago, but this low-cost technology remains marginal in wastewater treatment systems. The climate context is favourable to develop a set of low-cost wastewater treatment plants, particularly macrophyte-based systems. Pilot scale studies show the enormous potentialities of such sustainable technologies for water pollution control and treatment. None of the full scale applications works and this is due to the low economic level and the lack of political support. Another important reason is the lack of training and research. This situation requires the development of a collaborative network in which African researchers can share knowledge and promote sustainable wastewater treatment plants, as sanitation demand is growing exponentially in conjunction with the population growth in the cities. Stabilization ponds account for only 7% of the whole wastewater treatment technologies built in West and Central Africa, against 75% of activated sludge processes that in most cases failed. In spite of their bad quality, the effluents are widely reused in urban agriculture. Experimental data showed a maximum removal rate of 30% and 60% for COD and BOD5, respectively, and a maximum loading rate of 500 kg BOD/ha/d. Macrophytes-based systems are even more scarce (3%). The link of this technology with potential risks of malaria has slowed down its development. Nevertheless, data from studies in Niamey and Yaounde, and from rice culture irrigation zones showed that this correlation is not significant. Little research is done on wastewater treatment technologies for local application. This is one more reason why this study was based at EIER in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). The aim of this work was to determine the parameters for optimal removal performance and to elucidate design criteria of water lettuce-based wastewater treatment systems, possibly in combination with stabilization ponds to promote restrictive irrigation in market gardening. In secondary treatment, the maximum admissible loading rate was found to be 500 kg BOD5/ha/d (400 mg O2/l). Above this value, sludge accumulation at the pond surface caused by intensive methanogenic degradation of the sediments lead to plants die-off. COD and BOD5 removal rate was not correlated to redox state or dissolved oxygen concentrations. This indicated that the removal was mainly due to settlement and trapping of suspended solids in roots and sediments. Aerobic degradation remains low because the extent of oxygen release by plants cannot explain the yield obtained. COD and BOD5 removal performance reaches an optimum rate of 75% and 85% in two weeks hydraulic retention time, respectively. Regression equations between applied (λappl) and removed (λrem) loads is expressed by λrem (COD) = 0.75λappl (COD) – 10.4, (r2 = 0.99). The first order kinetic constant for BOD5 removal, kT = 0.14 d-1 (or kT = 0.11 d-1 for the DCO) can be used for designing of treatment ponds with the equation from the International Water Association (IWA). From the total nitrogen entering the treatment ponds, depending on the nitrogen load, between 44% and 60% were removed in the configuration with three ponds and a HRT of 18 days. Nitrogen can be removed by plant uptake with the harvest, by settlement or trapping with the suspended solid or by elementary nitrogen formation which occurs by the combination of nitrification, denitrification, and anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Nitrogen removal by plants was estimated to account for 10% to 39% in total nitrogen removed from ponds with a HRT of 18 days based on the steady growing and nitrogen uptake rate found. With a weekly harvesting rate of 50% of total plant biomass in the ponds, the water lettuce growing rate and the nitrogen uptake were 50 ± 1 g dry weight/m2 (182.5 t dry weight/ha/year) and 0.36 g N/m2/d (1314 kg N/ha/year), respectively. Trapping and settling of organic nitrogen present mainly in the suspended solids fraction removed about 25-48% of total nitrogen. It was found that water lettuce-based treatment systems conserved quite large amounts of ammonium in the effluents, a fact that is favourable for irrigation water reuse. Nevertheless, nitrogen loss by nitrification-denitrification occurred in water lettuce ponds, and perhaps even anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Nitrification became visible when COD dropped below 140 mg O2/l. With nitrogen loading varying from 31 to 97 kg N-NH4+/ha/d, the ammonium removal rate varied from 15-40% with a HRT of 18 days and from 20-60% with a HRT of 21 days. Hence, 40-80% of the ammonium was conserved in the water lettuce-based systems. In addition to conserve ammonium, water lettuce ponds also perform better than facultative ponds in organic pollutant removal, 75% against 50% in DCO reduction, respectively. When discharging the facultative pond effluent in a water lettuce pond, removal performance of the combined (upgraded) system is equal to that of a water lettuce pond. Faecal coliform removal in the two systems is very close, three weeks were necessary to ensure a reduction of three logarithmic units in faecal coliform concentration. To reach the objective of irrigation reuse, water lettuce-based treatment plants should not significantly affect the availability of the treated water. It was shown that the additional water loss due to the presence of Pistia stratiotes is lower than 10% of the average evaporation rate of microphytes ponds. Based on the results obtained during this study the following recommendations can be made. If the surface occupied by a plant is a limiting parameter, the footprint of the ponds can be decreased by designing a water lettuce based system with ponds depth bigger than the recommended 70 cm. This depth has been proposed to promote oxygen release in ponds, which was supposed to support aerobic oxidation. According to our results, organic matter removal is not correlated to oxygen availability. In addition, increasing the pond depth could also increase the ammonium conserved in the effluent. For restrictive irrigation, in market gardening, a hybrid system combining facultative ponds with water lettuce ponds is suitable, not only to secure the effluent quality, but also to reduce constrains related to plant management. During this thesis, the beginning of a network for collaboration has been created between members of different research teams including the Abdou-Moumouni University in Niamey, the Cheick Anta Diop University of Dakar, the University of Yaounde and the Ecole Inter-Etats d'Ingénieurs de l'Equipement Rural (Ouagadougou) in Burkina Faso. Several topics investigated during this study should be studied in more detail, and this best within the framework of this network of collaboration in West and Central Africa.

EPFL2002

Treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater: Ozone or powdered activated carbon?

David Andrew Barry, Luiz Felippe De Alencastro, Anoys Magnet, Jonas Margot, Luca Rossi

Many organic micropollutants present in wastewater, such as pharmaceuticals and pesticides, are poorly removed in conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). To reduce the release of these substances into the aquatic environment, advanced wastewater treatments are necessary. In this context, two large-scale pilot advanced treatments were tested in parallel over more than one year at the municipal WWTP of Lausanne, Switzerland. The treatments were: i) oxidation by ozone followed by sand filtration (SF) and ii) powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption followed by either ultrafiltration (UF) or sand filtration. More than 70 potentially problematic substances (pharmaceuticals, pesticides, endocrine disruptors, drugs metabolites and other common chemicals) were regularly measured at different stages of treatment. Additionally, several ecotoxicological tests such as the yeast estrogen screen, a combined algae bioassay and a fish early life stage test were performed to evaluate effluent toxicity. Both treatments significantly improved the effluent quality. Micropollutants were removed on average over 80% compared with raw wastewater, with an average ozone dose of 5.7 mg O3 l-1 or a PAC dose between 10 and 20 mg l-1 (Figure 1). Depending on the chemical properties of the substances (presence of electron-rich moieties, charge and hydrophobicity), either ozone or PAC performed better. Both advanced treatments led to a clear reduction in toxicity of the effluents, with PAC-UF performing slightly better overall. As both treatments had, on average, relatively similar efficiency, further criteria relevant to their implementation were considered, including local constraints (e.g., safety, sludge disposal, disinfection), operational feasibility and cost. For sensitive receiving waters (drinking water resources or recreational waters), the PAC-UF treatment, despite its current higher cost, was considered to be the most suitable option, enabling good removal of most micropollutants and macropollutants without forming problematic by-products, the strongest decrease in toxicity and a total disinfection of the effluent.