Running Large-Scale Simulations on the Neurorobotics Platform to Understand Vision - The Case of Visual Crowding

Traditionally, human vision research has focused on specific paradigms and proposed models to explain very specific properties of visual perception. However, the complexity and scope of modern psychophysical paradigms undermine the success of this approach. For example, perception of an element strongly deteriorates when neighboring elements are presented in addition (visual crowding). As it was shown recently, the magnitude of deterioration depends not only on the directly neighboring elements but on almost all elements and their specific configuration. Hence, to fully explain human visual perception, one needs to take large parts of the visual field into account and combine all the aspects of vision that become relevant at such scale. These efforts require sophisticated and collaborative modeling. The Neurorobotics Platform (NRP) of the Human Brain Project offers a unique opportunity to connect models of all sorts of visual functions, even those developed by different research groups, into a coherently functioning system. Here, we describe how we used the NRP to connect and simulate a segmentation model, a retina model, and a saliency model to explain complex results about visual perception. The combination of models highlights the versatility of the NRP and provides novel explanations for inward-outward anisotropy in visual crowding.

Shrinking Bouma's window: How to model crowding in dense displays

Alban Bornet, Adrien Christophe Doerig, Gregory Francis, Michael Herzog

In crowding, perception of a target deteriorates in the presence of nearby flankers. Traditionally, it is thought that visual crowding obeys Bouma's law, i.e., all elements within a certain distance interfere with the target, and that adding more elements always leads to stronger crowding. Crowding is predominantly studied using sparse displays (a target surrounded by a few flankers). However, many studies have shown that this approach leads to wrong conclusions about human vision. Van der Burg and colleagues proposed a paradigm to measure crowding in dense displays using genetic algorithms. Displays were selected and combined over several generations to maximize human performance. In contrast to Bouma's law, only the target's nearest neighbours affected performance. Here, we tested various models to explain these results. We used the same genetic algorithm, but instead of selecting displays based on human performance we selected displays based on the model's outputs. We found that all models based on the traditional feedforward pooling framework of vision were unable to reproduce human behaviour. In contrast, all models involving a dedicated grouping stage explained the results successfully. We show how traditional models can be improved by adding a grouping stage. Author summary To understand human vision, psychophysical research usually focuses on simple stimuli. Vision is often described as a cascade of feed-forward computations in which local features detectors pool information along the processing hierarchy to form complex and abstract features. Crowding is can be modelled within this framework by the pooling of information from one processing stage to the next. This naturally explains Bouma's law, a hallmark of crowding according to which only elements within a certain region, often proposed to be half the target eccentricity, interfere with the target. However, pooling models are strongly challenged by recent experimental results, because Bouma's law does not hold for more complex stimuli. Visual elements far beyond Bouma's window can increase or alleviate crowding. In addition, Van der Burg and colleagues showed that only the nearest neighbours interfere with the target in dense displays. Hence, Bouma's window can shrink too. Here, we aimed at modelling the range of crowding in dense displays. From previous studies, we know that visual grouping cannot be explained without grouping and segmentation. We compared the performance of different models of vision to the human data of Van der Burg and colleagues. We found that all models based on the traditional pooling framework of vision failed to reproduce the human data, whereas all models that included grouping and segmentation processes were successful in this respect. We concluded that grouping and segmentation processes naturally and consistently explain the difference between simple and complex displays in vision paradigms.

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE2021

Beyond Bouma's window: How to explain global aspects of crowding?

Alban Bornet, Aaron Michael Clarke, Adrien Christophe Doerig, Gregory Francis, Michael Herzog

In crowding, perception of an object deteriorates in the presence of nearby elements. Although crowding is a ubiquitous phenomenon, since elements are rarely seen in isolation, to date there exists no consensus on how to model it. Previous experiments showed that the global configuration of the entire stimulus must be taken into account. These findings rule out simple pooling or substitution models and favor models sensitive to global spatial aspects. In order to investigate how to incorporate global aspects into models, we tested a large number of models with a database of forty stimuli tailored for the global aspects of crowding. Our results show that incorporating grouping like components strongly improves model performance. Author summary Visual crowding highlights interactions between elements in the visual field. For example, an object is more difficult to recognize if it is presented in clutter. Crowding is one of the most fundamental aspects of vision, playing crucial roles in object recognition, reading and visual perception in general, and is therefore an essential tool to understand how the visual system encodes information based on its retinal input. Hence, classic models of crowding have focused only on local interactions between neighboring visual elements. However, abundant experimental evidence argues against local processing, suggesting that the global configuration of visual elements strongly modulates crowding. Here, we tested all available models of crowding that are able to capture global processing across the entire visual field. We tested 12 models including the Texture Tiling Model, a Deep Convolutional Neural Network and the LAMINART neural network with large scale computer simulations. We found that models incorporating a grouping component are best suited to explain the data. Our results suggest that in order to understand vision in general, mid-level, contextual processing is inevitable.

2019

Crowding and the importance of grouping and segmentation processes in human vision

Alban Bornet

Human vision has evolved to make sense of a world in which elements almost never appear in isolation. Surprisingly, the recognition of an element in a visual scene is strongly limited by the presence of other nearby elements, a phenomenon known as visual crowding. Crowding impacts vision at all levels and is thus a versatile tool to understand the fundamental mechanisms of vision. For decades, visual crowding was perfectly well explained by traditional feedforward models of vision. In these models, vision starts with the detection of low-level features. This information is combined locally along the hierarchy of the visual cortex to build more and more complex feature detectors, until neurons respond selectively and robustly to complex objects. Crowding happens when nearby elements interfere in this local feature combination process and impair target recognition. However, recent studies have shown that crowding is not determined by local interactions but by the global configuration across the entire visual field. Depending on how elements group together, crowding can even almost disappear, a phenomenon called uncrowding. Hence, crowding is rather a complex, global and high-level phenomenon, that simple feedforward models cannot explain. In this thesis, I first analyse which models of crowding can explain uncrowding. I compare the performance of diverse models, selected according to different architectural and functional features, such as feedforward vs. recurrent architecture, local or global information processing, including a grouping stage or not. I show that the only model that reproduces human behaviour includes a dedicated recurrent grouping processing stage. Second, I show that global effects in crowding cannot be explained by low-level accounts. It was argued that the Texture Tiling model, based on a complex and high-dimensional pooling stage, may account for global effects in crowding, without requiring any recurrent grouping stage. To test this model, I use a large pool of recent crowding data. I show that the Texture Tiling model is equivalent to a simple pooling model and is thus as limited as these models. Next, I focus on deep neural networks, which are well in the spirit of the feedforward framework of vision and have become state-of-the-art models both in computer vision and neuroscience. I test whether AlexNet and ResNet-50, which have been proposed as realistic models of the visual system, exhibit uncrowding. I show that these networks do not reproduce uncrowding for principled reasons. Finally, I use a genetic algorithm to generate stimuli based on the performance of different models, i.e., in a bottom-up manner. The goal is to avoid using stimuli that favour models of grouping from the start. I compare the distribution of stimuli that are produced by the models to the ones that are produced by humans. I show that only the models that include grouping and segmentations processes behave like humans. Taken together, the results in my thesis highlight the importance of recurrent grouping and segmentation processes in human vision when large portions of the visual field are involved. These results can be used as direct guidelines for future models of vision, in order to constraint how recurrent processing should be incorporated to improve the performance of deep neural networks and other feedforward models of vision, and help them generalize to more complex visual inputs.

EPFL2021