Engineering dendritic cell vaccines to improve cancer immunotherapy

At the interface between the innate and adaptive immune system, dendritic cells (DCs) play key roles in tumour immunity and hold a hitherto unrealized potential for cancer immunotherapy. Here we review the role of distinct DC subsets in the tumour microenvironment, with special emphasis on conventional type 1 DCs. Integrating new knowledge of DC biology and advancements in cell engineering, we provide a blueprint for the rational design of optimized DC vaccines for personalized cancer medicine.

Targeting and Modulating Tumor-Associated Sites with Novel Nanoparticle-Based Immunotherapies

Laura Jeanbart

Cancer is a global disease and a leading cause of death worldwide. While surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy comprise the classical tools to eradicate tumors, they do not cure cancer, cannot prevent metastases, lead to side effects, and most importantly they do not instruct the patientʼs immune system to recognize and fight tumor cells. Since the discovery of the immune systemʼs implication in cancer, immunotherapies, which aim at using and educating the immune system to fight and reject cancer, have come to complement classical tumor-debulking methods. A major goal of immunotherapy is to induce or activate effector cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes that can infiltrate and kill the tumor while overcoming immune suppressive mechanisms, which impede their efficacy. Moreover, cancer immunotherapies aim at inducing memory to tumor antigens to prevent relapse or metastases, which traditional therapies cannot do. Dendritic cell (DC) targeting and activation are key for inducing adaptive immunity. Our laboratory has developed synthetic nanoparticles (NPs) capable of draining through lymphatics to target skin-draining lymph nodes (LNs) and being phagocytosed by resident antigen-presenting cells (APCs) upon intradermal injection. We developed a reproducible method to conjugate tumor antigens to NPs and co-delivered them with CpG-conjugated NPs. We found that a NP vaccine composed of a single melanoma-derived peptide (TRP- 2180-188) led to dramatic tumor growth delay in melanoma and was more efficient than a NP vaccine containing several tumor antigens from whole tumor cell lysate (TL). These findings contradicted our hypothesis that immunization with TL might lead to a broader T cell response and hence improved therapeutic outcomes. Additionally, we found that the dose of CpG could modulate the magnitude of the therapeutic outcomes in both single epitope and multiple antigen based NP-vaccines. Considering the efficacy of the developed NP vaccines, we used them as a tool to ask a fundamental and extremely relevant question regarding the influence of vaccine administration site on clinical efficacy: is it therapeutically more beneficial to target a tumor- draining lymph node (tdLN), which is immune suppressed but tumor antigen-primed, or a non-tdLN, which is neither suppressed nor primed by the tumor? We found that targeting the tdLN with NP vaccines led to significantly enhanced therapeutic outcomes in two different tumor models over targeting a non-tdLN, and that efficacy relied on NP conjugation of antigen and adjuvant. This suggested that antigen drainage from the tumor might be available to APCs in the tdLN and we further hypothesized that therapies that lead to immunogenic tumor cell death might synergize with a tdLN-targeted adjuvant approach. While cytotoxic modalities, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, have traditionally been used for their ability to kill tumor cells, tumor cells shed antigens and debris upon cell death that drain to the tdLN. Consistent with our hypothesis, targeting an adjuvant to the tdLN enhanced therapeutic benefits of chemo- and radio- therapy, while targeting a non-tdLN did not. We hypothesized that targeting the tdLN with NP vaccines might switch the tdLN microenvironment from a suppressive to an immunogenic one. This suggested that direct targeting of active suppressive mechanisms in the tumor might further improve immunotherapy. We thus engineered a nano-sized micellar carrier loaded with 6-thioguanine (MC-6TG), a cytotoxic drug used in leukemia, and explored its use in targeting T cell- impairing myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in order to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic vaccines. MC-6TG entirely eradicated both Ly6c+ monocytic and Ly6g+ granulocytic MDSCs for up to 7 d in the blood, tumor and tdLN of tumor-bearing mice. Since MC-6TG also targeted certain subsets of macrophages and DCs, depleting MDSCs did not have an impact on the efficacy of a NP vaccine, which relies on APCs for efficacy. However, MC-6TG synergized with adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells, significantly delaying tumor growth and enhancing survival in a murine model of implantable melanoma. Overall, this thesis describes the design and implementation of a novel approach to immunotherapy: we engineered NP-based therapeutic vaccines, optimized their delivery route to enhance efficacy, and simultaneously tackled immune suppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment to allow optimal therapeutic outcomes. The technologies and methods developed in this work are particularly relevant to clinical oncology and have the potential to benefit cancer patients by improving cancer therapy efficacy.

EPFL2013

Engineering opportunities in cancer immunotherapy

Laura Jeanbart, Melody Swartz

Immunotherapy has great potential to treat cancer and prevent future relapse by activating the immune system to recognize and kill cancer cells. A variety of strategies are continuing to evolve in the laboratory and in the clinic, including therapeutic noncellular (vector-based or subunit) cancer vaccines, dendritic cell vaccines, engineered T cells, and immune checkpoint blockade. Despite their promise, much more research is needed to understand how and why certain cancers fail to respond to immunotherapy and to predict which therapeutic strategies, or combinations thereof, are most appropriate for each patient. Underlying these challenges are technological needs, including methods to rapidly and thoroughly characterize the immune microenvironment of tumors, predictive tools to screen potential therapies in patient-specific ways, and sensitive, information-rich assays that allow patient monitoring of immune responses, tumor regression, and tumor dissemination during and after therapy. The newly emerging field of immunoengineering is addressing some of these challenges, and there is ample opportunity for engineers to contribute their approaches and tools to further facilitate the clinical translation of immunotherapy. Here we highlight recent technological advances in the diagnosis, therapy, and monitoring of cancer in the context of immunotherapy, as well as ongoing challenges.

Natl Acad Sciences2015

New roles of the lymphatic endothelium in modulating adaptive immunity: implications for immune tolerance and cancer immunotherapy

Lambert Charles François Potin

Lymphatic vessels have traditionally been considered as passive conduits for interstitial fluid drainage and for immune cell trafficking to lymph nodes. In the last two decades, many studies have challenged this classical dogma: lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) were shown to actively interact with immune cells by secreting chemokines and cytokines, and presenting antigens to T cells. These newly described functions pinpoint a multi-faceted role of LECs in orchestrating the immune response through both passive and active mechanisms. Yet, precise mechanisms leading to antigen-specific fine-tuning of the T cell response remain unexplored. Moreover, although lymphatics have been shown to play important roles in cancer, the contributions of LECs in regulating antitumor immunity have been largely overlooked by the biomedical community. This doctoral thesis aimed at filling these gaps. First, in order to investigate the mechanisms and implications of LEC antigen presentation to CD4+ T cells, we engineered a mouse model where LECs lacked the ability to present antigens to CD4+ T cells. In these mice, antigen-specific responses to vaccination were increased when compared to wild-type controls. Moreover, we demonstrated that LECs were poor inducers of CD4+ T cell activation in vitro, and that they could dampen CD4+ T cell activation by dendritic cells. Taken together, these findings suggest that LECs participate to the peripheral immune tolerance of CD4+ T cells. Second, we investigated the immunological consequences of the development of lymphatic vessels, called lymphangiogenesis, in mouse melanoma. Upon induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis, we observed striking tumor enrichment with immune cells, which resulted in a higher sensitivity of those tumors to immunotherapy. We subsequently demonstrated that inducing lymphangiogenesis in a mouse model of cold tumors, which lack immune infiltrates and do not respond to immunotherapies, could restore their responsiveness to immunotherapy treatments. Third, to predict which cancer types were the most likely to replicate the findings we obtained in mouse melanoma, we mined The Cancer Genome Atlas database for gene expression. We identified a set of cancers, such as colon adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, where high expression of the lymphangiogenic growth factor was associated with a strong T cell signature. This doctoral thesis unveiled new immunomodulatory functions of LECs by which antigen-specific immune tolerance is induced. Additionally, it opened new avenues to target lymphatics therapeutically in cancer to potentiate immunotherapies. We believe this work contributes to demonstrating the immunological importance of LECs, and hope that lymphatics will be considered as an important immunomodulatory player of the tumor microenvironment when developing novel immunotherapies.