Many Are The Ways to Learn: Identifying multi-modal behavioral profiles of collaborative learning in constructivist activities

Understanding how learners engage with learning technologies, and its relation with their learning, is crucial to the design of effective learning interventions. Assessing the learners’ state however, is non-trivial. Research suggests that performance is not always a good indicator of learning, especially with open-ended constructivist activities. In this paper, we describe a combined multi-modal learning analytics and interaction analysis method which uses video, audio and log data to identify multi-modal collaborative learning behavioral profiles of 32 dyads as they work on an open-ended task around interactive tabletops with a robot mediator. These profiles, that we name Expressive Explorers, Calm Tinkerers, and Silent Wanderers, confirm previous findings that in a collaborative setting, the amount of speech interaction and the overlap of speech between a pair of learners are highly discriminating behaviors between learning and non-learning pairs, signifying that overlapping speech while turn-taking can indicate engagement that is conducive to learning. However, additionally considering learner affect and actions during the task helps us identify that there exist multiple behavioural profiles exhibited even among those who learn. Specifically, we discover that those who learn vary in their behaviors along the two dimensions of problem solving strategy (actions) and emotional expressivity (affect), suggesting that there is a relation between problem solving strategy and emotional behaviour; one strategy leads to more frustration compared to another. These findings have implications for the design of real-time learning interventions that support productive collaborative learning in open-ended tasks.

Temporal Pathways to Learning: How Learning Emerges in an Open-ended Collaborative Activity

Mortadha Abderrahim, Pierre Dillenbourg, Aditi Kothiyal, Jauwairia Nasir

The learning process depends on the nature of the learning environment, particularly in the case of open-ended learning environments, where the learning process is considered to be non-linear. In this paper, we report on the findings of employing a multimodal Hidden Markov Model (HMM) based methodology to investigate the temporal learning processes of two types of learners that have learning gains and a type that does not have learning gains in an open-ended collaborative learning activity. Considering log data, speech behavior, affective states and gaze patterns, we find that all learners start from a similar state of non-productivity, but once out of it they are unlikely to fall back into that state, especially in the case of the learners that have learning gains. Those who have learning gains shift between two problem solving strategies, each characterized by both exploratory and reflective actions, as well as demonstrate speech and gaze patterns associated with these strategies, that differ from those who don't have learning gains. Further, the teams that have learning gains also differ between themselves in the manner in which they employ the problem solving strategies over the interaction, as well as in the manner they express negative emotions while exhibiting a particular strategy. These outcomes contribute to understanding the multiple pathways of learning in an open-ended collaborative learning environment, and provide actionable insights for designing effective interventions.

2022

Learning By Collaborative Teaching : An Engaging Multi-Party CoWriter Activity

Thibault Lucien Christian Asselborn, Wafa Monia Benkaouar Johal, Pierre Dillenbourg, Jauwairia Nasir

This paper presents the design of a novel and engaging collaborative learning activity for handwriting where a group of participants simultaneously tutor a Nao robot. This activity was intended to take advantage of both collaborative learning and the learning by teaching paradigm to improve children’s meta-cognition (perception of their own skills). Multiple engagement probes were integrated into the activity as a first step towards fostering long term interactions. As a lot of research targets social interactions, the goal here was to determine whether an engagement strategy focused on the task could be as, or more efficient than one focused on social interactions and participants’ introspection. To that effect, two engagement strategies were implemented. They differed in content but used the same multi-modal design in order to increase participants’ meta-cognitive reflection, once on the task and performances, and once on participants’ enjoyment and emotions. Both strategies were compared to a baseline by probing and assessing engagement at the individual and group level, along the behavioural, emotional and cognitive dimensions, in a between subject experiment with 12 groups of children. The experiments showed that the collaborative task pushed the children to adapt their manner of writing to the group, even though the adopted solution was not always correct. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the strategies in terms of behaviour on task (behavioural engagement), satisfaction (emotional engagement) or performance (cognitive engagement) as the group dynamics had a stronger impact on the outcome of the collaborative teaching task. Therefore, the task and social engagement strategies can be considered as efficient in the context of collaboration. © 2019 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.

2019

Introducing Productive Engagement for Social Robots Supporting Learning

Jauwairia Nasir

We have all been one such student or seen such students who can maintain the 'good student' image while playing a video game under the table or those loyal backbenchers, seemingly always distracted, who then ace their exams. These intricacies of human behaviors are just a few examples of what makes it non-trivial and challenging even for expert teachers to know how students' visible behaviors relate with learning. As research investigates ways in which robots and AI can support teachers and students, it is faced with the same challenge of inferring students' engagement; thus, making the investigation of this topic increasingly popular in educational HRI. The state of the art usually explores the relationship between the robot behaviors and the engagement state of the learner while assuming a linear relationship between engagement and learning. However, is it correct to assume that to maximize learning, one needs to maximize engagement? Furthermore, conventional supervised engagement models require human annotators to get labels. This not only is laborious but can also introduce subjectivity. Can we have machine-learning engagement models where annotations do not rely on human annotators? Additionally, with the increase in open-ended learning activities which by design employ the 'learning by failing' paradigm, in-task performance can not be the best measure for learning. Can we instead rely on multi-modal behaviors? In an effort to cater for these challenges, this thesis dives deep to identify and quantify the relationship between learning and engagement, which we term as Productive Engagement (PE). In order to develop, design, and evaluate our PE framework, (1) we first designed and developed an open-ended collaborative learning activity that served as a platform for evaluating different robot variants over time. With 98 children interacting with the baseline version from 2 international Swiss schools, we showed that in-task performance and learning are indeed not correlated. Thus, this showed the importance of not being limited to robot interventions that affect only superficial measures of students' learning. (2) Then, with learner's multi-modal behaviors, we showed that indeed there is a hidden link between learner's behaviors and learning that can be quantified, i.e., validating the proposed concept of Productive Engagement. (3) This quantifiable link surfaced three collaborative multi-modal learner profiles, by using a forward and backward clustering and classification technique, two of which are linked to higher learning. This technique gave a possibility to surface data driven labels for engagement; thus, evading the process of human annotations. We then identified similarities and differences between these learner profiles both at an aggregate and at the temporal level. (4) Based on (3), we constructed a PE score that can either be directly used as an assessment metric by a social robot in real-time or as data driven labels for building more sophisticated regression models. (5) With the learner profiles and the PE score, we designed and evaluated more advanced robot variants for the final studies with ~160 students from 7 international Swiss schools. With the design of different robot variants that employ knowledge about the learner's skills conducive to learning, rather than domain knowledge, in order to provide interventions; we provided a complementary perspective on the role of social robots in educational settings.