"Can you hear me now?" : Automatic assessment of background noise intrusiveness and speech intelligibility in telecommunications

This thesis deals with signal-based methods that predict how listeners perceive speech quality in telecommunications. Such tools, called objective quality measures, are of great interest in the telecommunications industry to evaluate how new or deployed systems affect the end-user quality of experience. Two widely used measures, ITU-T Recommendations P.862 â PESQâ and P.863 â POLQAâ , predict the overall listening quality of a speech signal as it would be rated by an average listener, but do not provide further insight into the composition of that score. This is in contrast to modern telecommunication systems, in which components such as noise reduction or speech coding process speech and non-speech signal parts differently. Therefore, there has been a growing interest for objective measures that assess different quality features of speech signals, allowing for a more nuanced analysis of how these components affect quality. In this context, the present thesis addresses the objective assessment of two quality features: background noise intrusiveness and speech intelligibility. The perception of background noise is investigated with newly collected datasets, including signals that go beyond the traditional telephone bandwidth, as well as Lombard (effortful) speech. We analyze listener scores for noise intrusiveness, and their relation to scores for perceived speech distortion and overall quality. We then propose a novel objective measure of noise intrusiveness that uses a sparse representation of noise as a model of high-level auditory coding. The proposed approach is shown to yield results that highly correlate with listener scores, without requiring training data. With respect to speech intelligibility, we focus on the case where the signal is degraded by strong background noises or very low bit-rate coding. Considering that listeners use prior linguistic knowledge in assessing intelligibility, we propose an objective measure that works at the phoneme level and performs a comparison of phoneme class-conditional probability estimations. The proposed approach is evaluated on a large corpus of recordings from public safety communication systems that use low bit-rate coding, and further extended to the assessment of synthetic speech, showing its applicability to a large range of distortion types. The effectiveness of both measures is evaluated with standardized performance metrics, using corpora that follow established recommendations for subjective listening tests.